Controlling the hospital aquatic reservoir of multidrug-resistant organisms: a cross-sectional study followed by a nested randomized trial of sink decontamination.

Carbapenemase Colonisation Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Multidrug-resistant organisms Thermal disinfection chemical disinfection sink

Journal

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
ISSN: 1469-0691
Titre abrégé: Clin Microbiol Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9516420

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 May 2024
Historique:
received: 05 11 2023
revised: 25 04 2024
accepted: 12 05 2024
medline: 18 5 2024
pubmed: 18 5 2024
entrez: 17 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The hospital water environment is an important reservoir of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and presents a risk for patient safety. We assessed the effectiveness of thermal and chemical interventions on sinks contaminated with MDRO in hospital setting. We conducted a cross-sectional assessment of MDRO contamination of sinks and toilets in 26 clinical wards of a tertiary care hospital. MDRO-contaminated sink traps were then replaced and randomized (1:1:1) to receive chemical (sodium hypochlorite), thermal disinfection (steam), or no intervention. Interventions were repeated weekly for four weeks. Sinks were resampled seven days after the last intervention. The primary outcome was the proportion of decontaminated sinks. MDROs of interest were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and carbapenemase-producing s Enterobacterales, and non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli. In the cross-sectional assessment, at least one MDRO was identified in 258 (36%) of the 748 samples and in 91 (47%) of the 192 water sources. In total, 57 (42%) of the 137 sinks and 34 (62%) of the 55 toilets were contaminated with 137 different MDRO. The most common MDRO were ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (69%, 95/137), followed by VIM-producing P. aeruginosa (9%, 12/137) and Citrobacter spp. (6%, 5/137). In the nested randomized trial, 5 of 16 sinks (31%) in the chemical disinfection group were decontaminated, compared to 8 of 18 (44%) in the control group (OR 0.58, 95%CI 0.14-2.32) and 9 of 17 (53%) in the thermal disinfection group (OR 1.40, 95%CI 0.37- 5.32). Our study failed to demonstrate an added benefit of repeated chemical or thermal disinfection, beyond changing sink traps, in the MDRO decontamination of sinks. Routine chlorine-based disinfection of sinks may need to be reconsidered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38759869
pii: S1198-743X(24)00242-8
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2024.05.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests All authors have no interests to disclose.

Auteurs

Gaud Catho (G)

Infection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Infection Prevention and Control and Antimicrobial Resistance, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland; Division of Infectious Diseases, Central Institute, Valais Hospital, Sion, Switzerland. Electronic address: Gaud.catho@hcuge.ch.

Charlotte Cave (C)

Infection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Infection Prevention and Control and Antimicrobial Resistance, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.

Rebecca Grant (R)

Infection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Infection Prevention and Control and Antimicrobial Resistance, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.

Jennifer Carry (J)

Infection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Infection Prevention and Control and Antimicrobial Resistance, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.

Yves Martin (Y)

Infection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Infection Prevention and Control and Antimicrobial Resistance, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.

Gesuele Renzi (G)

Bacteriology Laboratory, Service of Laboratory Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Switzerland.

Aude Nguyen (A)

Infection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Infection Prevention and Control and Antimicrobial Resistance, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.

Niccolò Buetti (N)

Infection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Infection Prevention and Control and Antimicrobial Resistance, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.

Jacques Schrenzel (J)

Bacteriology Laboratory, Service of Laboratory Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Switzerland.

Stephan Harbarth (S)

Infection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Infection Prevention and Control and Antimicrobial Resistance, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH