Relationships Between Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Complete Heart Block.
Healthcare Disparities
Heart Block
National Inpatient Sample
Pacemaker
Socioeconomic Status
Journal
Heart rhythm
ISSN: 1556-3871
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101200317
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 May 2024
15 May 2024
Historique:
received:
02
04
2024
revised:
30
04
2024
accepted:
10
05
2024
medline:
18
5
2024
pubmed:
18
5
2024
entrez:
17
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Literature illustrates an association between adverse outcomes and lower socioeconomic status (SES) in patients with critical cardiovascular presentations. Despite this, limited data exists on Complete Heart Block (CHB) outcomes in the context of SES. We assessed the association of SES (using zip code income quartiles) with the outcomes of CHB cases. We queried the 2016-2019 Nationwide Inpatient Sample and identified CHB as the primary diagnosis. We compared in-hospital outcomes based on zip code mean income quartiles (≤2 (< $59,000) vs. ≥3). The primary outcome was mortality, while secondary outcomes included total and early Permanent Pacemaker (PPM) and Temporary Pacemaker (TPM) use, cardiogenic shock, palliative care involvement, mechanical ventilation use, length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Multivariable regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders. Of 150,265 CHB hospitalizations, 76,635 (51%) involved patients with a lower income quartile. Lower quartiles were associated with lower odds of early PPM use (adjusted OR [aOR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.90) and higher odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05-1.46), total TPM use (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14), palliative care (aOR 1.2, 95% CI 1.02-1.43), mechanical ventilation use (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.23), cardiogenic shock (aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.31), and longer LOS (4 days vs. 3.6 days, p <0.001) compared to patients in higher quartiles. Patients with lower income admitted for CHB were less likely to receive an early PPM and had higher adverse outcomes compared to patients with higher income. (250 words).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Literature illustrates an association between adverse outcomes and lower socioeconomic status (SES) in patients with critical cardiovascular presentations. Despite this, limited data exists on Complete Heart Block (CHB) outcomes in the context of SES.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
We assessed the association of SES (using zip code income quartiles) with the outcomes of CHB cases.
METHODS
METHODS
We queried the 2016-2019 Nationwide Inpatient Sample and identified CHB as the primary diagnosis. We compared in-hospital outcomes based on zip code mean income quartiles (≤2 (< $59,000) vs. ≥3). The primary outcome was mortality, while secondary outcomes included total and early Permanent Pacemaker (PPM) and Temporary Pacemaker (TPM) use, cardiogenic shock, palliative care involvement, mechanical ventilation use, length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Multivariable regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 150,265 CHB hospitalizations, 76,635 (51%) involved patients with a lower income quartile. Lower quartiles were associated with lower odds of early PPM use (adjusted OR [aOR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.90) and higher odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05-1.46), total TPM use (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14), palliative care (aOR 1.2, 95% CI 1.02-1.43), mechanical ventilation use (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.23), cardiogenic shock (aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.31), and longer LOS (4 days vs. 3.6 days, p <0.001) compared to patients in higher quartiles.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with lower income admitted for CHB were less likely to receive an early PPM and had higher adverse outcomes compared to patients with higher income. (250 words).
Identifiants
pubmed: 38759917
pii: S1547-5271(24)02567-0
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.025
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.