[Application of extra- and intracochlear electrocochleography during and after cochlear implantation].
Anwendung der extra- und intracochleären Elektrocochleographie während und nach der Cochleaimplantation.
Cochlear function
Cochlear implant
Electrocochleography
Hearing loss
Residual hearing
Journal
HNO
ISSN: 1433-0458
Titre abrégé: HNO
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 2985099R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 May 2024
18 May 2024
Historique:
accepted:
19
03
2024
medline:
18
5
2024
pubmed:
18
5
2024
entrez:
18
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Electrocochleography (ECochG) represents a promising approach for monitoring cochlear function during cochlear implantation and for investigating the causes of residual cochlear function loss after implantation. This paper provides an overview of the current research and application status of ECochG, both during and after cochlear implantation. Intraoperative ECochG can be conducted either via the implant itself or an extracochlear measuring electrode. Postoperative ECochG recordings are also feasible via the implant. Various studies have demonstrated that a significant decrease in ECochG amplitude during electrode insertion correlates with an increased risk of losing residual cochlear function, with critical cochlear events occurring primarily towards the end of the insertion. Postoperative data suggest that the loss of cochlear function mainly occurs in the early postoperative phase. Future research directions include the automation and objectification of signal analysis, as well as a more in-depth investigation into the underlying mechanisms of these signal changes. Die Elektrocochleographie (ECochG) bietet eine aussichtsreiche Möglichkeit zur Überwachung der cochleären Funktion während der Cochleaimplantation und zur Erforschung der Ursachen des Verlusts cochleärer Restfunktion nach der Implantation. Die vorliegende Arbeit gibt einen Überblick über den aktuellen Forschungs- und Anwendungsstand der ECochG, sowohl während als auch nach der Cochleaimplantation. Die intraoperative ECochG kann entweder durch das Implantat selbst oder mittels einer extracochleären Messelektrode durchgeführt werden. Postoperative ECochG-Aufnahmen sind über das Implantat möglich. Verschiedene Studien haben gezeigt, dass ein signifikanter Abfall der ECochG-Amplitude während der Elektrodeninsertion mit einem erhöhten Risiko für den Verlust der cochleären Restfunktion korreliert, wobei bedeutsame cochleäre Ereignisse vornehmlich gegen Ende der Insertion auftreten. Postoperative Daten deuten darauf hin, dass der Verlust der cochleären Funktion hauptsächlich in der frühen postoperativen Phase erfolgt. Zukünftige Forschungsansätze umfassen die Automatisierung und Objektivierung der Signalauswertung sowie eine vertiefte Untersuchung der den Signaländerungen zugrunde liegenden Mechanismen.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(ger)
Die Elektrocochleographie (ECochG) bietet eine aussichtsreiche Möglichkeit zur Überwachung der cochleären Funktion während der Cochleaimplantation und zur Erforschung der Ursachen des Verlusts cochleärer Restfunktion nach der Implantation. Die vorliegende Arbeit gibt einen Überblick über den aktuellen Forschungs- und Anwendungsstand der ECochG, sowohl während als auch nach der Cochleaimplantation. Die intraoperative ECochG kann entweder durch das Implantat selbst oder mittels einer extracochleären Messelektrode durchgeführt werden. Postoperative ECochG-Aufnahmen sind über das Implantat möglich. Verschiedene Studien haben gezeigt, dass ein signifikanter Abfall der ECochG-Amplitude während der Elektrodeninsertion mit einem erhöhten Risiko für den Verlust der cochleären Restfunktion korreliert, wobei bedeutsame cochleäre Ereignisse vornehmlich gegen Ende der Insertion auftreten. Postoperative Daten deuten darauf hin, dass der Verlust der cochleären Funktion hauptsächlich in der frühen postoperativen Phase erfolgt. Zukünftige Forschungsansätze umfassen die Automatisierung und Objektivierung der Signalauswertung sowie eine vertiefte Untersuchung der den Signaländerungen zugrunde liegenden Mechanismen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38761228
doi: 10.1007/s00106-024-01481-4
pii: 10.1007/s00106-024-01481-4
doi:
Types de publication
English Abstract
Journal Article
Review
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Helbig S et al (2016) Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation. Otol Neurotol 37(9):e353–9
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001066
pubmed: 27631659
Bester C et al (2022) Electrocochleography triggered intervention successfully preserves residual hearing during cochlear implantation: Results of a randomised clinical trial. Hear Res 426:108353
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108353
pubmed: 34600798
Schuerch K et al (2022) Increasing the reliability of real-time electrocochleography during cochlear implantation: a standardized guideline. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279(10):4655–4665
doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07204-7
pubmed: 35048175
Dalbert A et al (2021) Simultaneous Intra- and Extracochlear Electrocochleography During Electrode Insertion. Ear Hear 42(2):414–424
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000935
pubmed: 32826509
Gawliczek T et al (2023) Comparison of auditory brainstem response and electrocochleography to assess the coupling efficiency of active middle ear implants. Front Neurol 14:1231403
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1231403
pubmed: 37745650
pmcid: 10512052
Saoji AA et al (2023) Multi-Frequency Electrocochleography and Electrode Scan to Identify Electrode Insertion Trauma during Cochlear Implantation. Brain Sci 13(2)
Forgues M et al (2014) Distinguishing hair cell from neural potentials recorded at the round window. J Neurophysiol 111(3):580–593
doi: 10.1152/jn.00446.2013
pubmed: 24133227
Adunka OF et al (2010) Intracochlear recordings of electrophysiological parameters indicating cochlear damage. Otol Neurotol 31(8):1233–1241
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f1ffdf
pubmed: 20818290
pmcid: 3062515
Weder S et al (2021) Real Time Monitoring During Cochlear Implantation: Increasing the Accuracy of Predicting Residual Hearing Outcomes. Otol Neurotol 42(8):e1030–e1036
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003177
pubmed: 33859138
Kim JS, Brown CJ (2023) Acoustically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recorded From Cochlear Implant Users With Preserved Acoustic Hearing. Ear Hear 44(5):1061–1077
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001350
pubmed: 36882917
Gibson WP (2017) The Clinical Uses of Electrocochleography. Front Neurosci 11:274
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00274
pubmed: 28634435
pmcid: 5437168
Fitzpatrick, D.C., et al., Round window electrocochleography just before cochlear implantation: relationship to word recognition outcomes in adults. Otol Neurotol, 2014. 35(1): p. 64–71.
Dalbert A et al (2015) Correlation of Electrophysiological Properties and Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implant Patients. Otol Neurotol 36(7):1172–1180
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000768
pubmed: 25839980
Dalbert A et al (2015) Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Audiol Neurootol 20(5):339–348
doi: 10.1159/000438742
pubmed: 26340649
Schuerch K et al (2022) Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation. J Vis Exp 18(1)
Schuerch K et al (2023) Objective evaluation of intracochlear electrocochleography: repeatability, thresholds, and tonotopic patterns. Front Neurol 14:1181539
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1181539
pubmed: 37621854
pmcid: 10446839
Trecca EMC et al (2020) Electrocochleography and Cochlear Implantation: A Systematic Review. Otol Neurotol 41(7):864–878
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002694
pubmed: 32420718
Dalbert A et al (2020) Simultaneous Intra- and Extracochlear Electrocochleography During Electrode Insertion. Ear Hear 42(2):414–424
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000935
Dalbert A et al (2020) Correlation Between Electrocochleographic Changes During Surgery and Hearing Outcome in Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature. Otol Neurotol 41(3):318–326
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002506
pubmed: 31834213
Walia A et al (2022) Promontory Electrocochleography Recordings to Predict Speech-Perception Performance in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Otol Neurotol 43(8):915–923
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003628
pubmed: 35861658
pmcid: 9621328
Canfarotta MW et al (2021) Relationship Between Electrocochleography, Angular Insertion Depth, and Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes. Ear Hear 42(4):941–948
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000985
pubmed: 33369942
pmcid: 8217403
Dalbert A et al (2016) Assessment of Cochlear Trauma During Cochlear Implantation Using Electrocochleography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Otol Neurotol 37(5):446–453
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000998
pubmed: 26945317
Dalbert A et al (2019) Changes of Electrocochleographic Responses During Cochlear Implantation Presented at the Annual Meeting of ADANO 2016 in Berlin. Otol Neurotol 40(4):e424–e429
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001939
pubmed: 30870377
Calloway NH et al (2014) Intracochlear electrocochleography during cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 35(8):1451–1457
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000451
pubmed: 24892369
Campbell, L., et al., Cochlear response telemetry: intracochlear electrocochleography via cochlear implant neural response telemetry pilot study results. Otol Neurotol, 2015. 36(3): p. 399–405.
O’Leary S et al (2023) Monitoring Cochlear Health With Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation: Findings From an International Clinical Investigation. Ear Hear 44(2):358–370
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001288
pubmed: 36395515
Lenarz T et al (2022) Relationship Between Intraoperative Electrocochleography and Hearing Preservation. Otol Neurotol 43(1):e72–e78
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003403
pubmed: 34739427
pmcid: 8671360
Campbell L et al (2016) Intraoperative Real-time Cochlear Response Telemetry Predicts Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol 37(4):332–338
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000972
pubmed: 26859542
Yin LX et al (2021) Clinical Utility of Intraoperative Electrocochleography (ECochG) During Cochlear Implantation: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis. Otol Neurotol 42(3):363–371
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002996
pubmed: 33347054
Bester C et al (2021) Electrocochleography triggered intervention successfully preserves residual hearing during cochlear implantation: Results of a randomised clinical trial. Hear Res p:108353
Harris MS et al (2022) Can Electrocochleography Help Preserve Hearing After Cochlear Implantation With Full Electrode Insertion? Otol Neurotol 43(7):789–796
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003588
pubmed: 35861647
Dalbert A et al (2018) Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography. Front Neurosci 12:18
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00018
pubmed: 29434534
pmcid: 5790789
Bester C et al (2023) Electrocochleographic Patterns Predicting Increased Impedances and Hearing Loss after Cochlear Implantation. Ear Hear 44(4):710–720
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001319
pubmed: 36550618
Andonie RR et al (2023) Real-Time Feature Extraction From Electrocochleography With Impedance Measurements During Cochlear Implantation Using Linear State-Space Models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 70(11):3137–3146
doi: 10.1109/TBME.2023.3276993
pubmed: 37195836
Schuerch K et al (2022) Objectification of intracochlear electrocochleography using machine learning. Front Neurol 13:943816
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.943816
pubmed: 36105773
pmcid: 9465334
Van de Heyning PH et al (2022) Systematic Literature Review of Hearing Preservation Rates in Cochlear Implantation Associated With Medium- and Longer-Length Flexible Lateral Wall Electrode Arrays. Front Surg 9:893839
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.893839
pubmed: 36034377
pmcid: 9407249
Li H et al (2021) Three-dimensional tonotopic mapping of the human cochlea based on synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging. Sci Rep 11(1):4437
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83225-w
pubmed: 33627724
pmcid: 7904830
Schraivogel S et al (2023) Postoperative Impedance-Based Estimation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth. Ear Hear 44(6):1379–1388
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001379
pubmed: 37157125
pmcid: 10583924
Campbell L et al (2017) Electrophysiological Evidence of the Basilar-Membrane Travelling Wave and Frequency Place Coding of Sound in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Audiol Neurootol 22(3):180–189
doi: 10.1159/000478692
pubmed: 29084395