Development and validation of a short clinical risk management implementation (Short CRiMI) questionnaire.

Clinical risk management Deutschland Fragebogen Germany Hospital Klinisches Risikomanagement Krankenhaus Patient safety Patientensicherheit Questionnaire

Journal

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen
ISSN: 2212-0289
Titre abrégé: Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101477604

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 May 2024
Historique:
received: 20 10 2023
revised: 29 03 2024
accepted: 25 04 2024
medline: 19 5 2024
pubmed: 19 5 2024
entrez: 18 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Clinical Risk Management (CRM) is an important instrument to continuously improve safety of health care delivery. In Germany, hospitals are required by law to implement CRM and incidence reporting systems. Since 2010, nation-wide surveys have been conducted periodically to evaluate implementation of CRM in hospitals. The instrument used in these surveys is constantly being updated to reflect previous experiences, as well as to adapt to ongoing trends and developments in CRM practices. The survey instrument used in 2022 consisted of up to 200 items and took up to an hour to complete. In this study, we aimed to develop a short instrument to measure the level of CRM implementation in hospitals, evaluate its psychometric properties, and to offer benchmarking data for health care facilities of different sizes. We used data collected in 2022 as part of KHaSiMiR study, employing a cross-sectional self-reported online survey. The hospital administrations were invited to designate one CRM manager to participate in the study. Out of 1,411 general hospitals invited, 401 responses were collected (response rate of 28%). After removing the cases with excessive missings, we imputed remaining missing values using multiple imputation, and split the resulting sample (n=362) in two halves (i.e., exploratory and testing subsamples). A principal component analysis was applied on the first subsample. We validated the resulting model using confirmatory factor analysis in the testing subsample. We evaluated internal consistency, and tested external validity of the established instrument using correlation analysis with two single-item measures: subjective evaluation of CRM implementation compared to similar organizations and compared to own ideal level. The principal component analysis included 45 items from the full instrument. The analysis resulted in a three-factor model with 26 items. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the model demonstrated acceptable fit with the data according to the commonly used fit indices: Chi

Identifiants

pubmed: 38762346
pii: S1865-9217(24)00082-5
doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2024.04.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Auteurs

Nikoloz Gambashidze (N)

Institute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany. Electronic address: nikoloz.gambashidze@ukbonn.de.

Matthias Marsall (M)

Institute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Martina Schmiedhofer (M)

German Coalition for Patient Safety (Aktionsbündnis Patientensicherheit e.V.), Berlin, Germany.

Karl Blum (K)

Deutsches Krankenhausinstitut, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Hannah Roesner (H)

Wiesbaden Institute for Healthcare Economics and Patient Safety, Wiesbaden Business School, RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Wiesbaden, Germany.

Reinhard Strametz (R)

Wiesbaden Institute for Healthcare Economics and Patient Safety, Wiesbaden Business School, RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Wiesbaden, Germany.

Matthias Weigl (M)

Institute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Classifications MeSH