A qualitative exploration of professionals' perspectives on the implementation of reablement intervention programs in community care.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 May 2024
18 May 2024
Historique:
received:
30
10
2023
accepted:
09
05
2024
medline:
19
5
2024
pubmed:
19
5
2024
entrez:
18
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Reablement is considered a complex intervention due to its multicomponent, person-centered, holistic approach promoting older adults' active participation in daily activities. It is important to consider the unique context in which complex interventions are implemented, as contextual factors may interact and influence implementation outcomes. As part of the European TRANS-SENIOR project, this qualitative study aimed to gain insight into professionals' experiences with reablement implementation in Dutch community care. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, four focus groups were conducted comprising 32 professionals. Two groups were formed: one at operational level, including therapists, nursing staff, social workers, and domestic support; and one at organizational/strategic level, including project leaders, managers, directors, municipality representatives and health insurers. Participating care organizations had at least 6 months of experience with deploying and implementing reablement. Findings reflected three themes: (1) strength of interdisciplinary collaboration; highlighting significance of sharing goals and beliefs, (2) integrating the reablement philosophy into the organization; underscoring managements role in fostering support across all organizational layers, and (3) achieving a culture change in the healthcare system; emphasizing current funding models impeding value-based care tailored to the individual's goals and needs. The results offer valuable insights for implementation of complex interventions, like reablement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38762551
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62047-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-62047-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11391Subventions
Organisme : EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020)
ID : 812656
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Beard, J. R. et al. The World report on ageing and health: A policy framework for healthy ageing. The Lancet 387, 2145–2154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4
Rostgaard, T. et al. Livindhome: Living Independently at Home: Reforms in Home Care in 9 European Countries (SFI - Danish National Centre for Social Research, 2011).
Forsyth, A. & Molinsky, J. What is aging in place? Confusions and contradictions. Housing Policy Debate 31, 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2020.1793795 (2021).
doi: 10.1080/10511482.2020.1793795
Hatcher, D., Chang, E., Schmied, V. & Garrido, S. Exploring the perspectives of older people on the concept of home. J. Aging Res. 2019, 2679680. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2679680 (2019).
doi: 10.1155/2019/2679680
pubmed: 31316834
pmcid: 6604296
Haak, M., Fange, A., Iwarsson, S. & Ivanoff, S. D. Home as a signification of independence and autonomy: Experiences among very old Swedish people. Scand. J. Occup. Ther. 14, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120601024929 (2007).
doi: 10.1080/11038120601024929
pubmed: 17366074
Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J. & Allen, R. E. The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. Gerontologist 52, 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098 (2012).
doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr098
pubmed: 21983126
Rogers, W. A., Ramadhani, W. A. & Harris, M. T. Defining aging in place: The intersectionality of space, person, and time. Innov. Aging 4, 036. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa036 (2020).
doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaa036
Bigonnesse, C. & Chaudhury, H. The landscape of “aging in place” in gerontology literature: Emergence, theoretical perspectives, and influencing factors. J. Aging Environ. 34, 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2019.1638875 (2020).
doi: 10.1080/02763893.2019.1638875
Kuluski, K., Ho, J. W., Hans, P. K. & Nelson, M. Community care for people with complex care needs: Bridging the gap between health and social care. Int. J. Integr. Care 17, 2. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2944 (2017).
doi: 10.5334/ijic.2944
pubmed: 28970760
pmcid: 5624113
Rostgaard, T., Tuntland, H. & Parsons, J. In Reablement in Long-Term Care for Older People: International Perspectives and Future Directions (eds Rostgaard, T. et al.) 3–20 (Policy Press, 2023).
Metzelthin, S. F., Rostgaard, T., Parsons, M. & Burton, E. Development of an internationally accepted definition of reablement: A Delphi study. Ageing Soc. 42, 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20000999 (2022).
doi: 10.1017/S0144686X20000999
Mouchaers, I. et al. Development and content of a community-based reablement programme (I-MANAGE): A co-creation study. BMJ Open 13, e070890. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070890 (2023).
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070890
pubmed: 37648386
pmcid: 10471872
Buma, L. E., Vluggen, S., Zwakhalen, S., Kempen, G. I. J. M. & Metzelthin, S. F. Effects on clients’ daily functioning and common features of reablement interventions: A systematic literature review. Eur. J. Ageing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-022-00693-3 (2022).
doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00693-3
pubmed: 36506663
pmcid: 9729664
Tuntland, H., Parsons, J. & Rostgaard, T. In Reablement in Long-Term Care for Older People: International Perspectives and Future Directions (eds Rostgaard, T. et al.) 21–45 (Policy Press, 2023).
doi: 10.51952/9781447359944.ch002
Doh, D., Smith, R. & Gevers, P. Reviewing the reablement approach to caring for older people. Ageing Soc. 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18001770 (2019).
doi: 10.1017/S0144686X18001770
Aspinal, F., Glasby, J., Rostgaard, T., Tuntland, H. & Westendorp, R. G. New horizons: Reablement—Supporting older people towards independence. Age Ageing 45, 572–576. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw094 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw094
pubmed: 27209329
Metzelthin, S. F. et al. ‘Doing with …’ rather than ‘doing for …’ older adults: Rationale and content of the ‘Stay Active at Home’ programme. Clin. Rehabil. 31, 1419–1430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215517698733 (2017).
doi: 10.1177/0269215517698733
pubmed: 29050508
pmcid: 5652645
Moe, C. & Brinchmann, B. S. Tailoring reablement: A grounded theory study of establishing reablement in a community setting in Norway. Health Soc. Care Community 26, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12471 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/hsc.12471
pubmed: 28656740
Zingmark, M. & Norstrom, F. Transitions between levels of dependency among older people receiving social care—A retrospective longitudinal cohort study in a Swedish municipality. BMC Geriatr. 21, 342. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02283-x (2021).
doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02283-x
pubmed: 34078277
pmcid: 8173751
Morris, Z. S., Wooding, S. & Grant, J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: Understanding time lags in translational research. J. R. Soc. Med. 104, 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180 (2011).
doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180
pubmed: 22179294
pmcid: 3241518
Skivington, K. et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: Update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 374, n2061. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2061 (2021).
doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061
pubmed: 34593508
pmcid: 8482308
Anderson, L. M. et al. Introducing a series of methodological articles on considering complexity in systematic reviews of interventions. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 66, 1205–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.005 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.005
pubmed: 23953080
Datta, J. & Petticrew, M. Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: A content analysis of published papers. BMC Public Health 13, 568. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-568 (2013).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-568
pubmed: 23758638
pmcid: 3699389
Fu, B. Q. et al. Barriers and facilitators to implementing interventions for reducing avoidable hospital readmission: Systematic review of qualitative studies. Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 12, 7089. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7089 (2023).
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7089
pubmed: 37579466
pmcid: 10125127
Cooper, J. et al. Barriers and facilitators to implementing community-based physical activity interventions: A qualitative systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 18, 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01177-w (2021).
doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01177-w
pubmed: 34493306
pmcid: 8422651
Rubio-Valera, M. et al. Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of primary prevention and health promotion activities in primary care: A synthesis through meta-ethnography. PLoS ONE 9, e89554. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089554 (2014).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089554
pubmed: 24586867
pmcid: 3938494
Fakha, A. et al. A myriad of factors influencing the implementation of transitional care innovations: A scoping review. Implement. Sci. 16, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01087-2 (2021).
doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01087-2
pubmed: 33637097
pmcid: 7912549
Groot Kormelinck, C. M., Janus, S. I. M., Smalbrugge, M., Gerritsen, D. L. & Zuidema, S. U. Systematic review on barriers and facilitators of complex interventions for residents with dementia in long-term care. Int. Psychogeriatr. 33, 873–889. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220000034 (2021).
doi: 10.1017/S1041610220000034
pubmed: 32029016
Ashe, M. C. et al. Determinants of implementing reablement into research or practice: A concept mapping study. Physiother. Res. Int. 1, e1949. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1949 (2022).
doi: 10.1002/pri.1949
Jacobi, C. J., Thiel, D. & Allum, N. Enabling and constraining successful reablement: Individual and neighbourhood factors. PLoS ONE 15, e0237432. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237432 (2020).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237432
pubmed: 32886657
pmcid: 7473582
Wess, T., Steiner, W., Dür, M. & Janssen, J. Reablement—Relevant factors for implementation: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods study design. BMC Health Serv. Res. 22, 959. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08355-x (2022).
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08355-x
pubmed: 35902845
pmcid: 9336056
Stausholm, M. N., Pape-Haugaard, L., Hejlesen, O. K. & Secher, P. H. Reablement professionals’ perspectives on client characteristics and factors associated with successful home-based reablement: A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 21, 665. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06625-8 (2021).
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06625-8
pubmed: 34229691
pmcid: 8262059
Lewin, G., Parsons, J., O’Connell, H. & Metzelthin, S. F. In Reablement in Long-Term Care for Older People: International Perspectives and Future Directions (eds Rostgaard, T. et al.) 93–117 (Policy Press, 2023).
doi: 10.51952/9781447359944.ch005
Parsons, J. et al. In Reablement in Long-Term Care for Older People: International Perspectives and Future Directions (eds Rostgaard, T. et al.) 68–92 (Policy Press, 2023).
doi: 10.51952/9781447359944.ch004
Li, S.-A., Jeffs, L., Barwick, M. & Stevens, B. Organizational contextual features that influence the implementation of evidence-based practices across healthcare settings: A systematic integrative review. Syst. Rev. 7, 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0734-5 (2018).
doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0734-5
pubmed: 29729669
pmcid: 5936626
Damschroder, L. J. et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement. Sci. 4, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 (2009).
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
pubmed: 19664226
pmcid: 2736161
Damschroder, L. J. et al. The consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR): Progress to date, tools and resources, and plans for the future. Implement. Sci. 10, A12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-10-S1-A12 (2015).
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-10-S1-A12
pmcid: 4552015
Birken, S. A. et al. Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: Results from an international survey. Implement. Sci. 12, 124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0656-y (2017).
doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0656-y
pubmed: 29084566
pmcid: 5663064
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P. & Craig, J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 19, 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 (2007).
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
pubmed: 17872937
Palinkas, L. A. et al. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm. Policy Ment. Health 42, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
pubmed: 24193818
pmcid: 4012002
Elo, S. & Kyngas, H. The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs. 62, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x (2008).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
pubmed: 18352969
CFIR Research Team-Center for Clinical Management Research. Qualitative Data. https://cfirguide.org/evaluation-design/qualitative-data/ (2023).
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S. & Redwood, S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 13, 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 (2013).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
pubmed: 24047204
pmcid: 3848812
Thomas, E. & Magilvy, J. K. Qualitative rigor or research validity in qualitative research. J. Spec. Pediatr. Nurs. 16, 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6155.2011.00283.x (2011).
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2011.00283.x
pubmed: 21439005
Hjelle, K. M., Skutle, O., Alvsvåg, H. & Førland, O. Reablement teams’ roles: A qualitative study of interdisciplinary teams’ experiences. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 11, 305–316. https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.S160480 (2018).
doi: 10.2147/jmdh.S160480
pubmed: 30013357
pmcid: 6037265
Hjelle, K. M., Skutle, O., Forland, O. & Alvsvag, H. The reablement team’s voice: A qualitative study of how an integrated multidisciplinary team experiences participation in reablement. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 9, 575–585. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S115588 (2016).
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S115588
pubmed: 27843324
pmcid: 5098780
Culph, J. et al. Exploring relationships between health professionals through the implementation of a reablement program for people with dementia: A mixed methods study. Brain Impair. 21, 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2020.2 (2020).
doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2020.2
Bramble, M. et al. A scoping review exploring reablement models of training and client assessment for older people in primary health care. Prim. Health Care Res. Dev. 23, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423621000918 (2022).
doi: 10.1017/S1463423621000918
pubmed: 35197146
pmcid: 8919184
Vluggen, S. H. M., Metzelthin, S., Huisman-de Waal, G., Bleijlevens, M. & de Lange, W. Lessons learned and implications of function focused care based programs of various nursing care settings: A thematic synthesis. Ann. Nurs. Res. Pract. 6, 1 (2021).
Toto, P. E., Alchin, T., Yanes, C., Park, J. & Fields, B. E. Implementing CAPABLE with care partners through an area agency on aging: Identifying barriers and facilitators using the consolidated framework for implementation research. Gerontologist 63, 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnac097 (2023).
doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac097
pubmed: 35797990
Reay, T. & Hinings, C. R. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Org. Stud. 30, 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803 (2009).
doi: 10.1177/0170840609104803
Goodrick, E. & Reay, T. Constellations of institutional logics: Changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work Occup. 38, 372–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888411406824 (2011).
doi: 10.1177/0730888411406824
Maxwell, H. et al. Staff experiences of a reablement approach to care for older people in a regional Australian community: A qualitative study. Health Soc. Care Community 29, 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13331 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/hsc.13331
pubmed: 33682976
pmcid: 8252516
Goorts, K., Dizon, J. & Milanese, S. The effectiveness of implementation strategies for promoting evidence informed interventions in allied healthcare: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 21, 241. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06190-0 (2021).
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06190-0
pubmed: 33736631
pmcid: 7977260
Albright, K. et al. Communication strategies to facilitate the implementation of new clinical practices: A qualitative study of community mental health therapists. Transl. Behav. Med. 12, 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibab139 (2022).
doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab139
pubmed: 34791490
Montano, A.-R., Cornell, P. Y. & Gravenstein, S. Barriers and facilitators to interprofessional collaborative practice for community-dwelling older adults: An integrative review. J. Clin. Nurs. 32, 1534–1548. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15991 (2023).
doi: 10.1111/jocn.15991
pubmed: 34405476
Miller, H. D. From volume to value: Better ways to pay for health care. Health Aff. (Millwood) 28, 1418–1428. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1418 (2009).
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1418
pubmed: 19738259
Wang, Y., Hou, W., Wang, X., Zhang, H. & Wang, J. Bad to all? A novel way to analyze the effects of fee-for-service on multiple grades hospitals operation outcomes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312723 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312723
Mason, A., Goddard, M., Weatherly, H. & Chalkley, M. Integrating funds for health and social care: An evidence review. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 20, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819614566832 (2015).
doi: 10.1177/1355819614566832
pubmed: 25595287
pmcid: 4469543
van den Bulck, A. O. E. et al. Which client characteristics predict home-care needs? Results of a survey study among Dutch home-care nurses. Health Soc. Care Community 27, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12611 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/hsc.12611
pubmed: 30027552
Damschroder, L. J., Reardon, C. M., Widerquist, M. A. O. & Lowery, J. The updated consolidated framework for implementation research based on user feedback. Implement. Sci. 17, 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0 (2022).
doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0
pubmed: 36309746
pmcid: 9617234
Domecq, J. P. et al. Patient engagement in research: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 14, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-89 (2014).
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89
pubmed: 24568690
pmcid: 3938901
Waltz, T. J., Powell, B. J., Fernández, M. E., Abadie, B. & Damschroder, L. J. Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: Diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement. Sci. 14, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4
pubmed: 31036028
pmcid: 6489173