Social Vulnerability and Receipt of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

To evaluate the association between a population-level measure of social determinants of health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing radical cystectomy. We queried our institutional database for patients with nonmetastatic MIBC treated with radical cystectomy between 2000 and 2022. Patients were assigned an SVI via ZIP code of residence and grouped into quintiles of SVI (i.e. least vulnerable to most vulnerable). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between SVI and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjusting for age, race, gender, and cancer stage. A sub-analysis was performed to evaluate the association between subthemes of SVI (socioeconomic status, household composition/disability, race/ethnicity/language, and housing/transportation) and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of the 978 patients identified, 490 (50.1%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a lower SVI, were younger, and had >cT2 stage (all, p<0.05). The most vulnerable patients had lower odds of receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 0.61, 0.39 - 0.95) compared to the least vulnerable patients. Analysis of subthemes of SVI demonstrated similar associations by socioeconomic status (OR 0.56, 0.36 - 0.86) and household composition/disability (OR 0.57, 0.33 - 0.99). Adverse social determinants of health, or social vulnerability, is associated with suboptimal and disparate utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with MIBC undergoing radical cystectomy. Strategies for identifying vulnerable populations may allow for more targeted interventions that would improve equity in bladder cancer care.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Rishi R. Sekar reports a relationship with Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network that includes: funding grants. Rishi R. Sekar reports a relationship with National Institutes of Health that includes: funding grants. Lindsey A. Herrel reports a relationship with National Institute of Health that includes: funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.