Estimation of population affinity using proximal femoral measurements based on computed tomographic images in the Japanese and western Australian populations.

Ancestry estimation Computed tomography Femora Japanese Western Australian

Journal

International journal of legal medicine
ISSN: 1437-1596
Titre abrégé: Int J Legal Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9101456

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 May 2024
Historique:
received: 26 01 2024
accepted: 14 05 2024
medline: 20 5 2024
pubmed: 20 5 2024
entrez: 19 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The present study analyzes morphological differences femora of contemporary Japanese and Western Australian individuals and investigates the feasibility of population affinity estimation based on computed tomographic (CT) data. The latter is deemed to be of practical importance because most anthropological methods rely on the assessment of aspects of skull morphology, which when damaged and/or unavailable, often hampers attempts to estimate population affinity. The study sample comprised CT scans of 297 (146 females; 151 males) Japanese and 330 (145 females; 185 males) Western Australian adult individuals. A total of 10 measurements were acquired in two-dimensional CT images of the left and right femora; two machine learning methods (random forest modeling [RFM]) and support vector machine [SVM]) were then applied for population affinity classification. The accuracy of the two-way (sex-specific and sex-mixed) model was between 71.38 and 82.07% and 76.09-86.09% for RFM and SVM, respectively. Sex-specific (female and male) models were slightly more accurate compared to the sex-mixed models; there were no considerable differences in the correct classification rates between the female- and male-specific models. All the classification accuracies were higher in the Western Australian population, except for the male model using SVM. The four-way sex and population affinity model had an overall classification accuracy of 74.96% and 79.11% for RFM and SVM, respectively. The Western Australian females had the lowest correct classification rate followed by the Japanese males. Our data indicate that femoral measurements may be particularly useful for classification of Japanese and Western Australian individuals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38763925
doi: 10.1007/s00414-024-03257-5
pii: 10.1007/s00414-024-03257-5
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Balseven-Odabasi A, Yalcinozan E, Keten A, Akçan R, Tumer AR, Onan A, Canturk N, Odabasi O, Hakan Dinc A (2013) Age and sex estimation by metric measurements and fusion of hyoid bone in a Turkish population. J Forensic Leg Med 20:496–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.022
doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.022 pubmed: 23756521
Meeusen RA, Christensen AM, Hefner JT (2015) The use of femoral neck axis length to estimate sex and ancestry. J Forensic Sci 60:1300–1304 PMID: 26258403. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12820
doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12820 pubmed: 26258403
Ross AH, Pilloud M (2021) The need to incorporate human variation and evolutionary theory in forensic anthropology: a call for reform. Am J Phys Anthropol 176:672–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24384
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24384 pubmed: 34365637
Bethard JD, DiGangi EA (2020) Letter to the editor-moving beyond a Lost cause: Forensic Anthropology and Ancestry estimates in the United States. J Forensic Sci 65:1791–1792. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14513
doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14513 pubmed: 33104304
Ross AH, Williams SE (2021) Ancestry studies in Forensic Anthropology: back on the Frontier of Racism. Biology (Basel) 10:602. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10070602
doi: 10.3390/biology10070602 pubmed: 34209891
Ousley SD, Jantz RL (1993) Fordisc personal computer forensic discriminant function. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Hefner JT (2009) Cranial nonmetric variation and estimating ancestry*. J Forensic Sci 54:985–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01118.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01118.x pubmed: 19686390
Stewart TD (1962) Anterior femoral curvature: its utility for race identification. Hum Biol 34:49–62
pubmed: 13917160
Ballard ME (1999) Anterior femoral curvature revisited: race assessment from the femur. J Forensic Sci 44:700–707
doi: 10.1520/JFS14539J pubmed: 10432602
Wescott DJ (2005) Population variation in femur subtrochanteric shape. J Forensic Sci 50:286–293. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2004281
doi: 10.1520/JFS2004281 pubmed: 15813538
Steyn M, Işcan MY (1998) Sexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whites. Forensic Sci Int 98:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(98)00120-0
doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(98)00120-0 pubmed: 10036755
Henneberg M, Van den Berg ER (1990) Test of socioeconomic causation of secular trend: stature changes among favored and oppressed south africans are parallel. Am J Phys Anthropol 83:459–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330830407
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330830407 pubmed: 2275483
Louw GJ, Henneberg M (1997) Lack of secular trend in adult stature in white South African males born between 1954 and 1975. Homo 48:54–61
Christensen AM, Leslie WD, Baim S (2014) Ancestral differences in femoral neck axis length: possible implications for forensic anthropological analyses. Forensic Sci Int 236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.027 Epub 2014 Jan 7 :193.e1-193.e4
Attia MH, Attia MH, Farghaly YT, Abulnoor BAE, Manolis SK, Purkait R, Ubelaker DH, Sotiris K, Manolis (2022 February) Purkait’s triangle revisited: role in sex and ancestry estimation. Forensic Sci Res 7 14:440–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1963396
Annual Report of Statistics on Japanese Nationals Overseas (2024) https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/100436737.pdf Accessed 22
Setiawati R, Rahardjo P, Ruriana I, Guglielmi G (2023) Anthropometric study using three-dimensional pelvic CT scan in sex determination among adult Indonesian population. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 19:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-022-00526-w
doi: 10.1007/s12024-022-00526-w pubmed: 36103007
Franklin D, Flavel A (2019) Population specificity in the estimation of skeletal age and sex: case studies using a western Australian population. Aust J Forensic Sci 51(sup1):S188–S192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2019.1569722
doi: 10.1080/00450618.2019.1569722
Ward J (2022) A multifaceted, multijurisdictional, multiagency, and multidisciplinary approach to investigating unidentified and missing persons cases in Australia. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser 8:53–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2022.09.020
doi: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2022.09.020
Decker SJ, Davy-Jow SL, Ford JM, Hilbelink DR (2011) Virtual determination of sex: metric and nonmetric traits of the adult pelvis from 3D computed tomography models. J Forensic Sci 56:1107–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01803.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01803.x pubmed: 21595690
Ramsthaler F, Kettner M, Gehl A, Verhoff MA (2010) Digital forensic osteology: morphological sexing of skeletal remains using volume-rendered cranial CT scans. Forensic Sci Int 195:148–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.12.010
doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.12.010 pubmed: 20074879
Kim KM, Brown JK, Kim KJ, Choi HS, Kim HN, Rhee Y, Lim SK (2011) Differences in femoral neck geometry associated with age and ethnicity. Osteoporos Int 22:2165–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1459-z
doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1459-z pubmed: 20976592
Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Kuliukas A (2013) Estimation of sex from cranial measurements in a western Australian population. Forensic Sci Int 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.005 . :158.e1–158.e8
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2021) /2022 Cultural Diversity: Census: Information on country of birth, year of arrival, ancestry, language and religion. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/people-and-communities/cultural-diversity-census/latest-release . Accessed 27 March 2024
Colman KL, Janssen MCL, Stull KE, van Rijn RR, Oostra RJ, de Boer HH, van der Merwe AE (2018) Dutch population specific sex estimation formulae using the proximal femur. Forensic Sci Int 286:268e1–268e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.029
doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.029
Goto R, Mascie-Taylor CG (2007) Precision of measurement as a component of human variation. J Physiol Anthropol 26:253–256. https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa2.26.253
doi: 10.2114/jpa2.26.253 pubmed: 17435374
Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Kuliukas A, Marks MK, Hart R, Oxnard C, O’Higgins P (2013) Concordance of traditional osteometric and volume-rendered MSCT interlandmark cranial measurements. Int J Legal Med 127:505–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0772-9
doi: 10.1007/s00414-012-0772-9 pubmed: 23052442
Ulijaszek SJ, Kerr DA (1999) Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Br J Nutr 82:165–177. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114599001348
doi: 10.1017/S0007114599001348 pubmed: 10655963
Bass WM (2005) Human osteology: a laboratory and field manual, 5th edn. University of Columbia, MO
Weinberg SM, Scott NM, Neiswanger K, Marazita ML (2005) Intraobserver error associated with measurements of the hand. Am J Hum Biol 17:368–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20129
doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20129 pubmed: 15849702
Navega D, Coelho C, Vicente R, Ferreira MT, Wasterlain S, Cunha E (2015) AncesTrees: ancestry estimation with randomized decision trees. Int J Legal Med 129:1145–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1050-9
doi: 10.1007/s00414-014-1050-9 pubmed: 25053239
Spiros MC, Hefner JT (2020) Ancestry estimation using cranial and postcranial macromorphoscopic traits. J Forensic Sci 65:921–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14231
doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14231 pubmed: 31725188
Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20:273–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018
doi: 10.1007/BF00994018
Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by random forest. R News 2:18–22
Meyer D, Dimitriadou E, Hornik K (2023) Package e1071: Misc functions of the department of statistics, probability theory group (formerly: E1071), TU Wien. R package version 1.7–14. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=e1071 . https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/e1071/e1071.pdf Accessed 8 January 2024
Seeman E (2002) Pathogenesis of bone fragility in women and men. Lancet 359:1841–1850. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08706-8
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08706-8 pubmed: 12044392
Gregory JS, Aspden RM (2008) Femoral geometry as a risk factor for osteoporotic hip fracture in men and women. Med Eng Phys 30:1275–1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.002
doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.002 pubmed: 18976949
Krüger GC, L’Abbé EN, Stull KE (2017) Sex estimation from the long bones of modern South africans. Int J Legal Med 131:275–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1488-z
doi: 10.1007/s00414-016-1488-z pubmed: 27826647
Siddiqi N (2013) Comparison of osteometric femoral bone dimensions among the South africans of different ethnic groups and South African whites. Jforensic Sci 3:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfs.2012.11.001
doi: 10.1016/j.ejfs.2012.11.001
Chin K, Evans MC, Cornish J, Cundy T, Reid IR (1997) Differences in hip axis and femoral neck length in premenopausal women of Polynesian, Asian and European origin. Osteoporos Int 7:344–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623775
doi: 10.1007/BF01623775 pubmed: 9373568
Ishii S, Cauley JA, Greendale GA, Danielson ME, Safaei Nili N, Karlamangla A (2012) Ethnic differences in composite indices of femoral neck strength. Osteoporos Int 23:1381–1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1723-x
doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1723-x pubmed: 21927926
Patriquin ML, Steyn M, Loth SR (2002) Metric assessment of race from the pelvis in South africans. Forensic Sci Int 127:104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00113-5
doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00113-5 pubmed: 12098533
L’Abbé EN, Kenyhercz MW, Stull KE, Keough N, Nawrocki S (2013) Application of Fordisc 3.0 to explore differences among crania of north American and South African blacks and whites. J Forensic Sci 58:1579–1583. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12198
doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12198 pubmed: 23865813
Liebenberg L, Krüger GC, L’Abbé EN, Stull KE (2019) Postcraniometric sex and ancestry estimation in South Africa: a validation study. Int J Legal Med 133:289–296 PMID: 29797281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1865-x
doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-1865-x pubmed: 29797281
Dayal MR, Spocter MA, Bidmos MA (2008) An assessment of sex using the skull of black South africans by discriminant function analysis. Homo 59:209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2007.01.001
doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2007.01.001 pubmed: 18439606
Krüger GC, L’Abbé EN, Stull KE, Kenyhercz MW (2015) Sexual dimorphism in cranial morphology among modern South africans. Int J Legal Med 129:869–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1111-0
doi: 10.1007/s00414-014-1111-0 pubmed: 25394745
Spradley MK, Jantz RL (2011) Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci 56:289–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01635.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01635.x pubmed: 21210801
Richman EA, Michel ME, Schulter-Ellis FP, Corruccini RS (1979) Determination of sex by discriminant function analysis of postcranial skeletal measurements. J Forensic Sci 24:159–167. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS10803J
doi: 10.1520/JFS10803J pubmed: 512599
Holliday TW, Falsetti AB (1999) A new method for discriminating African-American from european-american skeletons using postcranial osteometrics reflective of body shape. J Forensic Sci 44:926–930. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS12018J
doi: 10.1520/JFS12018J pubmed: 10486943
Ousley SD (2016) Forensic classification and biodistance in the 21st century: the rise of learning machines. In: Pilloud MA, Hefner JT (eds) Biological distance analysis: forensic and bioarchaeological perspectives. Elsevier, London (UK), pp 197–212
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801966-5.00010-X
Gill GW, Hughes SS, Bennett SM, Gilbert BM (1988) Racial identification from the midfacial skeleton with special reference to American indians and whites. J Forensic Sci 33:92–99. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS12440J
doi: 10.1520/JFS12440J pubmed: 3351476
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
Oladipo GS, Ugomba HAA, Suleiman YA (2009) Comparative study of the subpubic angle of adult ijaws and igbos. Asian J Med Sci 1:26–29
Price B, Cameron N, Tobias PV (1987) A further search for a secular trend of adult body size in South African blacks: evidence from the femur and tibia. Hum Biol 59:467–475
pubmed: 3610121
Cunha E, Ubelaker DH (2020) Evaluation of ancestry from human skeletal remains: a concise review. Forensic Sci Res 5:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2019.1697060
doi: 10.1080/20961790.2019.1697060 pubmed: 32939424
Colman KL, Dobbe JGG, Stull KE, Ruijter JM, Oostra RJ, van Rijn RR, van der Merwe AE, de Boer HH, Streekstra GJ (2017) The geometrical precision of virtual bone models derived from clinical computed tomography data for forensic anthropology. Int J Legal Med 131:1155–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1548-z
doi: 10.1007/s00414-017-1548-z pubmed: 28185072 pmcid: 5491564
Ubelaker DH, Ross AH, Graver SM (2002) Application of forensic discriminant functions to a Spanish cranial sample. Forensic Sci Commun 4:1–6. https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/about-us/lab/forensic-science-communications/fsc/july2002/ubelaker1.htm
Wescott DJ (2006) Ontogeny of femur subtrochanteric shape in native americans and American Blacks and whites. J Forensic Sci 51:1240–1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00261.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00261.x pubmed: 17199609
Alunni V, du Pd J, Nogueira L, Buchet L, Quatrehomme G (2015) Comparing discriminant analysis and neural network for the determination of sex using femur head measurements. Forensic Sci Int 253:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.05.023
doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.05.023 pubmed: 26093772
Dayal M, Steyn M, Kevin L (2008) Stature estimation from bones of South African whites. S Afr J Sci 104:1–8
Macho GA (1991) Morphological asymmetries in southern African populations. Further evidence for lateralization. Int J Anthropol 6:215–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02444949
doi: 10.1007/BF02444949

Auteurs

Suguru Torimitsu (S)

Centre for Forensic Anthropology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. torimitsu@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Department of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. torimitsu@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Akari Nakazawa (A)

Centre for Forensic Anthropology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113- 8655, Japan.

Ambika Flavel (A)

Centre for Forensic Anthropology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.

Lauren Swift (L)

Centre for Forensic Anthropology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.

Yohsuke Makino (Y)

Department of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.

Hirotaro Iwase (H)

Department of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.

Daniel Franklin (D)

Centre for Forensic Anthropology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.

Classifications MeSH