Influenza surveillance in pigs: balancing act between broad diagnostic coverage and specific virus characterization.
Cross-sectional
Enzootic infection
Multiplex RT-qPCR
Sampling material
Subtyping
Swine influenza a virus
Journal
Porcine health management
ISSN: 2055-5660
Titre abrégé: Porcine Health Manag
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101684126
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 May 2024
19 May 2024
Historique:
received:
17
01
2024
accepted:
28
03
2024
medline:
20
5
2024
pubmed:
20
5
2024
entrez:
19
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Monitoring of infectious diseases on swine farms requires a high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the test system. Moreover, particularly in cases of swine influenza A virus (swIAV) it is desirable to include characterization of the virus as precisely as possible. This is indispensable for strategies concerning prophylaxis of swIAV and furthermore, to meet the requirements of a purposeful monitoring of newly emerging swIAV strains in terms of vaccine design and public health. Within the present cross-sectional study, we compared the diagnostic value of group samples (wipes of surfaces with direct contact to mouth/nose, dust wipes, udder skin wipes, oral fluids) to individual samples (nasal swabs, tracheobronchial swabs) for both swIAV identification and characterization. Sampling included different stages of pig production on 25 sow farms with attached nursery considered as enzootically infected with swIAV. Firstly, samples were analyzed for IAV genome and subsequently samples with Ct-values < 32 were subtyped by multiplex RT-qPCR. Nasal swabs of suckling piglets and nursery pigs resulted in a higher odds to detect swIAV (p < 0.001) and to identify swIAV subtypes by RT-qPCR (p < 0.05) compared to nasal swabs of sows. In suckling piglets, significant higher rates of swIAV detection could be observed for nasal swabs (p = 0.007) and sow udder skin wipes (p = 0.036) compared to contact wipes. In the nursery, group sampling specimens were significantly more often swIAV positive compared to individual samples (p < 0.01), with exception of the comparison between contact wipes and nasal swabs (p = 0.181). However, in general nasal swabs were more likely to have Ct-value < 32 and thus, to be suitable for subtyping by RT-qPCR compared to dust wipes, contact wipes, udder skin wipes and tracheobronchial swabs (p < 0.05). Interestingly, different subtypes were found in different age groups as well as in different specimens in the same holding. Although population-based specimens are highly effective for swIAV monitoring, nasal swabs are still the preferable sampling material for the surveillance of on-farm circulating strains due to significantly higher virus loads. Remarkably, sampling strategies should incorporate suckling piglets and different age groups within the nursery to cover as many as possible of the on-farm circulating strains.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Monitoring of infectious diseases on swine farms requires a high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the test system. Moreover, particularly in cases of swine influenza A virus (swIAV) it is desirable to include characterization of the virus as precisely as possible. This is indispensable for strategies concerning prophylaxis of swIAV and furthermore, to meet the requirements of a purposeful monitoring of newly emerging swIAV strains in terms of vaccine design and public health. Within the present cross-sectional study, we compared the diagnostic value of group samples (wipes of surfaces with direct contact to mouth/nose, dust wipes, udder skin wipes, oral fluids) to individual samples (nasal swabs, tracheobronchial swabs) for both swIAV identification and characterization. Sampling included different stages of pig production on 25 sow farms with attached nursery considered as enzootically infected with swIAV. Firstly, samples were analyzed for IAV genome and subsequently samples with Ct-values < 32 were subtyped by multiplex RT-qPCR.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Nasal swabs of suckling piglets and nursery pigs resulted in a higher odds to detect swIAV (p < 0.001) and to identify swIAV subtypes by RT-qPCR (p < 0.05) compared to nasal swabs of sows. In suckling piglets, significant higher rates of swIAV detection could be observed for nasal swabs (p = 0.007) and sow udder skin wipes (p = 0.036) compared to contact wipes. In the nursery, group sampling specimens were significantly more often swIAV positive compared to individual samples (p < 0.01), with exception of the comparison between contact wipes and nasal swabs (p = 0.181). However, in general nasal swabs were more likely to have Ct-value < 32 and thus, to be suitable for subtyping by RT-qPCR compared to dust wipes, contact wipes, udder skin wipes and tracheobronchial swabs (p < 0.05). Interestingly, different subtypes were found in different age groups as well as in different specimens in the same holding.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Although population-based specimens are highly effective for swIAV monitoring, nasal swabs are still the preferable sampling material for the surveillance of on-farm circulating strains due to significantly higher virus loads. Remarkably, sampling strategies should incorporate suckling piglets and different age groups within the nursery to cover as many as possible of the on-farm circulating strains.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38764074
doi: 10.1186/s40813-024-00367-9
pii: 10.1186/s40813-024-00367-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
19Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Brookes SM, Nunez A, Choudhury B, Matrosovich M, Essen SC, Clifford D, Slomka MJ, Kuntz-Simon G, Garcon F, Nash B, Hanna A, Heegaard PMH, Queguiner S, Chiapponi C, Bublot M, Garcia JM, Gardner R, Foni E, Loeffen W, Larsen L, Van Reeth K, Banks J, Irvine RM, Brown IH. Replication, pathogenesis and transmission of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus in non-immune pigs. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(2):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009068 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009068
Grøntvedt CA, Er C, Gjerset B, Germundsson A, Framstad T, Brun E, Jorgensen A, Lium B. Clinical impact of infection with pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 virus in naive nucleus and multiplier pig herds in Norway. Influenza Res Treat. 2011;2011:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/163745 .
doi: 10.1155/2011/163745
Gumbert S, Froehlich S, Rieger A, Stadler J, Ritzmann M, Zoels S. Reproductive performance of pandemic influenza a virus infected sow herds before and after implementation of a vaccine against the influenza A (H1N1) pdm09 virus. Porcine Health Manag. 2020;6(1):1–9.
doi: 10.1186/s40813-019-0141-x
Freidl GS, Meijer A, de Bruin E, de Nardi M, Munoz O, Capua I, Breed AC, Harris K, Hill A, Kosmider R. Influenza at the animal–human interface: a review of the literature for virological evidence of human infection with swine or avian influenza viruses other than a (H5N1). Eurosurveillance. 2014;19(18).
Er C, Lium B, Tavornpanich S, Hofmo PO, Forberg H, Hauge AG, Grøntvedt CA, Framstad T, Brun E. Adverse effects of Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection on growth performance of Norwegian pigs - a longitudinal study at a boar testing station. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10(1):284. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-014-0284-6 .
doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0284-6
pubmed: 25472551
pmcid: 4300606
Ma W. Swine influenza virus: current status and challenge. Virus Res. 2020;288:198118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198118 .
doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198118
pubmed: 32798539
Hennig C, Graaf A, Petric PP, Graf L, Schwemmle M, Beer M, Harder T. Are pigs overestimated as a source of zoonotic influenza viruses? Porcine Health Manag. 2022;8(1):1–12.
doi: 10.1186/s40813-022-00274-x
Ryt-Hansen P, Krog JS, Breum S, Hjulsager CK, Pedersen AG, Trebbien R, Larsen LE. Co-circulation of multiple influenza a reassortants in swine harboring genes from seasonal human and swine influenza viruses. Elife. 2021;10. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60940 .
Bhatta T, Ryt-Hansen P, Nielsen J, Larsen L, Larsen I, Chamings A, Goecke N, Alexandersen S. Infection Dynamics of Swine Influenza Virus in a Danish Pig Herd reveals recurrent infections with different variants of the H1N2 swine influenza a Virus Subtype. Viruses. 2020;12(9):1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12091013 .
doi: 10.3390/v12091013
pubmed: 32927910
pmcid: 7551734
Simon G, Larsen LE, Dürrwald R, Foni E, Harder T, Van Reeth K, Markowska-Daniel I, Reid SM, Dan A, Maldonado J. European surveillance network for influenza in pigs: surveillance programs, diagnostic tools and swine influenza virus subtypes identified in 14 European countries from 2010 to 2013. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e115815.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115815
pubmed: 25542013
pmcid: 4277368
Henritzi D, Petric PP, Lewis NS, Graaf A, Pessia A, Starick E, Breithaupt A, Strebelow G, Luttermann C, Parker LMK. Surveillance of European domestic pig populations identifies an emerging reservoir of potentially zoonotic swine influenza a viruses. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28(4):614–27. e6.
doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.07.006
pubmed: 32721380
Zhu J, Jiang Z, Liu J. The matrix gene of pdm/09 H1N1 contributes to the pathogenicity and transmissibility of SIV in mammals. Vet Microbiol. 2021;255:109039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2021.109039 .
doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2021.109039
pubmed: 33740730
Zhu H, Zhou B, Fan X, Lam TT, Wang J, Chen A, Chen X, Chen H, Webster RG, Webby R, Peiris JS, Smith DK, Guan Y. Novel reassortment of eurasian avian-like and pandemic/2009 influenza viruses in swine: infectious potential for humans. J Virol. 2011;85(20):10432–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.05352-11 .
doi: 10.1128/jvi.05352-11
pubmed: 21849442
pmcid: 3187487
Janke BH, Influenza. A virus infections in swine: Pathogenesis and diagnosis. Vet Pathol. 2014;51(2):410–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985813513043 .
doi: 10.1177/0300985813513043
pubmed: 24363301
Kubacki J, Fraefel C, Bachofen C. Implementation of next-generation sequencing for virus identification in veterinary diagnostic laboratories. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2021;33(2):235–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638720982630 .
doi: 10.1177/1040638720982630
pubmed: 33357110
Swenson SL, Foni E, Saito T, Brown I. Influenza A virus of swine. In: OiE World organisation for animal health, editor. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2016. 7th ed2015.
Ma W, Vincent AL, Lager KM, Janke BH, Henry SC, Rowland RRR, Hesse RA, Richt JA. Identification and characterization of a highly virulent triple reassortant H1N1 swine influenza virus in the United States. Virus Genes. 2009;40(1):28–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-009-0413-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s11262-009-0413-7
pubmed: 19862613
Van Reeth K, Labarque G, Pensaert M. Serological profiles after consecutive experimental infections of pigs with European H1N1, H3N2, and H1N2 swine influenza viruses. Viral Immunol. 2006;19(3):373–82.
doi: 10.1089/vim.2006.19.373
pubmed: 16987057
Henritzi D, Zhao N, Starick E, Simon G, Krog JS, Larsen LE, Reid SM, Brown IH, Chiapponi C, Foni E. Rapid detection and subtyping of European swine influenza viruses in porcine clinical samples by haemagglutinin-and neuraminidase‐specific tetra‐and triplex real‐time RT‐PCRs. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2016;10(6):504–17.
doi: 10.1111/irv.12407
pubmed: 27397600
pmcid: 5059951
Detmer S, Gramer M, Goyal S, Torremorell M, Torrison J. Diagnostics and Surveillance for Swine Influenza. In: Richt JA, Webby RJ, editors. Swine Influenza. 370. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012. pp. 85–112.
doi: 10.1007/82_2012_220
Reeth KV, Labarque G, Pensaert M. Serological profiles after Consecutive Experimental infections of pigs with European H1N1, H3N2, and H1N2 swine influenza viruses. Viral Immunol. 2006;19(3):373–82. https://doi.org/10.1089/vim.2006.19.373 .
doi: 10.1089/vim.2006.19.373
pubmed: 16987057
Unterweger C, Debeerst S, Klingler E, Auer A, Redlberger-Fritz M, Stadler J, Pesch S, Lillie-Jaschniski K, Ladinig A. Herausforderungen Bei Der Influenzadiagnostik in Einem Schweinebetrieb– Ein Fallbericht. Tierärztliche Praxis Ausgabe G: Großtiere / Nutztiere. 2021;49(06):425–31. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1580-6938 .
doi: 10.1055/a-1580-6938
pubmed: 34861735
Deblanc C, Hervé S, Gorin S, Cador C, Andraud M, Quéguiner S, Barbier N, Paboeuf F, Rose N, Simon G. Maternally-derived antibodies do not inhibit swine influenza virus replication in piglets but decrease excreted virus infectivity and impair post-infectious immune responses. Vet Microbiol. 2018;216:142–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.01.019 .
doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.01.019
pubmed: 29519509
Landolt GA, Karasin AI, Phillips L, Olsen CW. Comparison of the pathogenesis of two genetically different H3N2 influenza a viruses in pigs. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(5):1936–41.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.5.1936-1941.2003
pubmed: 12734230
pmcid: 154671
Neira V, Rabinowitz P, Rendahl A, Paccha B, Gibbs SG, Torremorell M. Characterization of viral load, viability and persistence of influenza a virus in air and on surfaces of swine production facilities. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0146616.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146616
pubmed: 26757362
pmcid: 4710569
Garrido-Mantilla J, Alvarez J, Culhane M, Nirmala J, Cano JP, Torremorell M. Comparison of individual, group and environmental sampling strategies to conduct influenza surveillance in pigs. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15(1):1–10.
doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1805-0
Deffner P, Maurer R, Cvjetković V, Sipos W, Krejci R, Ritzmann M, Eddicks M. Cross-sectional study on the in-herd prevalence of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae at different stages of pig production. Vet Rec. 2022;191(7):e1317. https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.1317 .
doi: 10.1002/vetr.1317
pubmed: 35032397
Spackman E. Avian influenza virus detection and quantitation by real-time RT-PCR. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1161:105–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0758-8_10 .
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0758-8_10
pubmed: 24899424
Graaf-Rau A, Hennig C, Lillie-Jaschniski K, Koechling M, Stadler J, Boehmer J, Ripp U, Pohlmann A, Schwarz BA, Beer M, Harder T. Emergence of swine influenza a virus, porcine respirovirus 1 and swine orthopneumovirus in porcine respiratory disease in Germany. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2023;12(2):2239938. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2023.2239938 .
doi: 10.1080/22221751.2023.2239938
pubmed: 37470510
pmcid: 10402848
Anderson TK, Macken CA, Lewis NS, Scheuermann RH, Reeth KV, Brown IH, Swenson SL, Simon G, Saito T, Berhane Y, Ciacci-Zanella J, Pereda A, Davis CT, Donis RO, Webby RJ, Vincent AL. A phylogeny-based global nomenclature System and Automated Annotation Tool for H1 hemagglutinin genes from Swine Influenza A viruses. mSphere. 2016;1(6):e00275–16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00275-16 .
doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00275-16
pubmed: 27981236
pmcid: 5156671
Swenson SL, Vincent LL, Lute BM, Janke BH, Lechtenberg KF, Landgraf JG, Schmitt BJ, Kinker DR, McMillen JK. A comparison of diagnostic assays for the detection of type a swine influenza virus from nasal swabs and lungs. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2001;13(1):36–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870101300108 .
doi: 10.1177/104063870101300108
pubmed: 11243361
Van Reeth K, Vincent AL. Influenza Viruses. In: Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Ramirez A, Schwartz KJ, Stevenson GW, Zhang J, editors. Diseases of Swine. 11th Edition: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2019. pp. 576– 93.
Allerson M, Davies P, Gramer M, Torremorell M. Infection Dynamics of Pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza virus in a two-site swine herd. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2014;61(6):490–9.
doi: 10.1111/tbed.12053
pubmed: 23294593
Decorte I, Steensels M, Lambrecht B, Cay AB, De Regge N. Detection and isolation of swine influenza a virus in spiked oral fluid and samples from individually housed, experimentally infected pigs: potential role of porcine oral fluid in active influenza a virus surveillance in swine. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0139586.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139586
pubmed: 26431039
pmcid: 4592207
Hernandez-Garcia J, Robben N, Magnée D, Eley T, Dennis I, Kayes SM, Thomson JR, Tucker AW. The use of oral fluids to monitor key pathogens in porcine respiratory disease complex. Porcine Health Manag. 2017;3(1):1–13.
doi: 10.1186/s40813-017-0055-4
Ciuoderis KA, Perez LS, Cardona A, Hernandez-Ortíz JP, Osorio JE. Use of oral fluids for efficient monitoring of influenza viruses in swine herds in Colombia. Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias. 2022;35(3).
Romagosa A, Gramer M, Joo HS, Torremorell M. Sensitivity of oral fluids for detecting influenza A virus in populations of vaccinated and non-vaccinated pigs. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2011;6(2):110–8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00276.x
pubmed: 21777397
pmcid: 3203275
Chamba Pardo FO, Alba-Casals A, Nerem J, Morrison RB, Puig P, Torremorell M. Influenza herd-level prevalence and seasonality in Breed-to-Wean Pig Farms in the Midwestern United States. Front Vet Sci. 2017;4:167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00167 .
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00167
pubmed: 29075636
pmcid: 5641542
Ramirez A, Wang C, Prickett JR, Pogranichniy R, Yoon K-J, Main R, Johnson JK, Rademacher C, Hoogland M, Hoffmann P. Efficient surveillance of pig populations using oral fluids. Prev Vet Med. 2012;104(3–4):292–300.
doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.11.008
pubmed: 22154249
Panyasing Y, Goodell C, Kittawornrat A, Wang C, Levis I, Desfresne L, Rauh R, Gauger PC, Zhang J, Lin X, Azeem S, Ghorbani-Nezami S, Yoon KJ, Zimmerman J. Influenza a Virus Surveillance based on pre-weaning piglet oral fluid samples. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2016;63(5):e328–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12307 .
doi: 10.1111/tbed.12307
pubmed: 25488821
Goodell CK, Zhang J, Strait E, Harmon K, Patnayak D, Otterson T, Culhane M, Christopher-Hennings J, Clement T, Leslie-Steen P, Hesse R, Anderson J, Skarbek K, Vincent A, Kitikoon P, Swenson S, Jenkins-Moore M, McGill J, Rauh R, Nelson W, O’Connell C, Shah R, Wang C, Main R, Zimmerman JJ. Ring test evaluation of the detection of influenza a virus in swine oral fluids by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and virus isolation. Can J Vet Res. 2016;80(1):12–20.
pubmed: 26733728
pmcid: 4686030
Detmer SE, Patnayak DP, Jiang Y, Gramer MR, Goyal SM. Detection of Influenza A virus in porcine oral fluid samples. J Veterinary Diagn Investigation: Official Publication Am Association Veterinary Lab Diagnosticians Inc. 2011;23(2):241–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063871102300207 .
doi: 10.1177/104063871102300207
Anderson BD, Ma M, Xia Y, Wang T, Shu B, Lednicky JA, Ma MJ, Lu J, Gray GC. Bioaerosol Sampling in Modern Agriculture: a Novel Approach for emerging Pathogen Surveillance? J Infect Dis. 2016;214(4):537–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw180 .
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw180
pubmed: 27190187
pmcid: 4957437
Prost K, Kloeze H, Mukhi S, Bozek K, Poljak Z, Mubareka S. Bioaerosol and surface sampling for the surveillance of influenza a virus in swine. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019;66(3):1210–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13139 .
doi: 10.1111/tbed.13139
pubmed: 30715792
Ferreira JB, Grgić H, Friendship R, Wideman G, Nagy É, Poljak Z. Longitudinal study of influenza a virus circulation in a nursery swine barn. Vet Res. 2017;48(1):63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-017-0466-x .
doi: 10.1186/s13567-017-0466-x
pubmed: 29017603
pmcid: 5634873
Lillie-Jaschniski K, Lisgara M, Pileri E, Jardin A, Velazquez E, Köchling M, Albin M, Casanovas C, Skampardonis V, Stadler J. A New Sampling Approach for the detection of Swine Influenza a Virus on European Sow farms. Veterinary Sci. 2022;9(7):338.
doi: 10.3390/vetsci9070338
de Lara AC, Garrido-Mantilla J, Lopez-Moreno G, Yang M, Barcellos DE, Torremorell M. Effect of pooling udder skin wipes on the detection of influenza a virus in preweaning pigs. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2022;34(1):133–5.
doi: 10.1177/10406387211039462
pubmed: 34404296
Allerson M, Deen J, Detmer SE, Gramer MR, Joo HS, Romagosa A, Torremorell M. The impact of maternally derived immunity on influenza a virus transmission in neonatal pig populations. Vaccine. 2013;31(3):500–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.023 .
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.023
pubmed: 23174202
Almeida MN, Rotto H, Schneider P, Robb C, Zimmerman JJ, Holtkamp DJ, Rademacher CJ, Linhares DCL. Collecting oral fluid samples from due-to-wean litters. Prev Vet Med. 2020;174:104810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104810 .
doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104810
pubmed: 31756669
Dawson LL, Edwards SA. The effects of flavored rope additives on commercial pen-based oral fluid yield in pigs. J Veterinary Behav. 2015;10(3):267–71.
doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2015.01.003
Blackie N, de Sousa M. The Use of Garlic Oil for olfactory Enrichment increases the Use of ropes in Weaned pigs. Anim (Basel). 2019;9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040148 .
Henao-Diaz A, Giménez-Lirola L, Magtoto R, Ji J, Zimmerman J. Evaluation of three commercial porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) oral fluid antibody ELISAs using samples of known status. Res Vet Sci. 2019;125:113–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.05.019
pubmed: 31181347
Zorić JM, Milićević V, Stevančević O, Chiapponi C, Potkonjak A, Stojanac N, Kureljušić B, Veljović L, Radosavljević V, Savić B. Phylogenetic analysis of HA and na genes of swine influenza viruses in Serbia in 2016–2018. Acta Vet. 2020;70(1):110–25.
doi: 10.2478/acve-2020-0008
Vereecke N, Zwickl S, Gumbert S, Graaf A, Harder T, Ritzmann M, Lillie-Jaschniski K, Theuns S, Stadler J. Viral and bacterial profiles in Endemic Influenza A Virus Infected Swine herds using Nanopore Metagenomic sequencing on Tracheobronchial Swabs. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(2):e0009823. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00098-23 .
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00098-23
pubmed: 36853049
Smits H, Kiss I, Kovács E, Albert M, Pesch S, Halas M, Lillie-Jaschniski K, editors. Comparison of different Influenza sampling methods after a controlled challenge. 14th European Symposium of Porcine Health Management (ESPHM); 2023 May 31 - June 2 2023; Thesaloniki, Greece.
Harder TC, grosse Beilage E, Lange E, Meiners C, Döhring S, Pesch S, Noé T, Grund C, Beer M, Starick E. Expanded cocirculation of stable subtypes, emerging lineages, and new sporadic reassortants of Porcine Influenza viruses in Swine populations in Northwest Germany. J Virol. 2013;87(19):10460–76. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00381-13 .
doi: 10.1128/JVI.00381-13
pubmed: 23824819
pmcid: 3807404
Lange J, Groth M, Schlegel M, Krumbholz A, Wieczorek K, Ulrich R, Köppen S, Schulz K, Appl D, Selbitz HJ, Sauerbrei A, Platzer M, Zell R, Dürrwald R. Reassortants of the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus and establishment of a novel porcine H1N2 influenza virus, lineage in Germany. Vet Microbiol. 2013;167(3–4):345–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.09.024 .
doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.09.024
pubmed: 24139631
Corzo CA. Observations regarding influenza A virus shedding in a swine breeding farm after mass vaccination. 2012;20(6):283–9.