Emergence characteristics comparing endotracheal tube to reinforced laryngeal mask airway during endoscopic sinus surgery - A randomised controlled study.

Anaesthesia emergence time endoscopic sinus surgery endotracheal tube laryngeal masks paranasal sinuses reinforced

Journal

Indian journal of anaesthesia
ISSN: 0019-5049
Titre abrégé: Indian J Anaesth
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0013243

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2024
Historique:
received: 04 10 2023
revised: 05 03 2024
accepted: 06 03 2024
medline: 20 5 2024
pubmed: 20 5 2024
entrez: 20 5 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

During endoscopic sinus surgery, anaesthetic conditions significantly impact the intraoperative surgical field and bleeding during emergence. While the endotracheal tube (ETT) has been traditionally used in sinus surgery, a reinforced laryngeal mask airway (RLMA) that produces less upper airway stimulation may result in smoother emergence. A randomised controlled trial of 72 patients undergoing elective sinus surgery was conducted, with the allocation of airway technique to either ETT with a throat pack or RLMA. The primary outcome measure was emergence time, measured by time to opening eyes on commands at the cessation of anaesthesia, and the secondary outcomes were time to removal of airway device, remifentanil use, procedure times, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the RLMA grade of blood contamination. The continuous variables were analysed using Student's There was no significant difference in the emergence time between the ETT and RLMA groups ( RLMA comparable to ETT in terms of emergence time. The RMLA group had lower remifentanil use, anaesthesia duration and fewer postoperative adverse events such as cough and throat pain.

Sections du résumé

Background and Aims UNASSIGNED
During endoscopic sinus surgery, anaesthetic conditions significantly impact the intraoperative surgical field and bleeding during emergence. While the endotracheal tube (ETT) has been traditionally used in sinus surgery, a reinforced laryngeal mask airway (RLMA) that produces less upper airway stimulation may result in smoother emergence.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A randomised controlled trial of 72 patients undergoing elective sinus surgery was conducted, with the allocation of airway technique to either ETT with a throat pack or RLMA. The primary outcome measure was emergence time, measured by time to opening eyes on commands at the cessation of anaesthesia, and the secondary outcomes were time to removal of airway device, remifentanil use, procedure times, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the RLMA grade of blood contamination. The continuous variables were analysed using Student's
Results UNASSIGNED
There was no significant difference in the emergence time between the ETT and RLMA groups (
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
RLMA comparable to ETT in terms of emergence time. The RMLA group had lower remifentanil use, anaesthesia duration and fewer postoperative adverse events such as cough and throat pain.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38764963
doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_966_23
pii: IJA-68-460
pmc: PMC11100652
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

460-466

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Professor Alkis J Psaltis is a consultant for Medtronic and Neurent and is on the speakers bureau for GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Karl Storz and Sequiris. He is a shareholder in Chitogel.

Auteurs

Vasanth Raokadam (V)

Department of Anaesthesia, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Venkatesan Thiruvenkatarajan (V)

Department of Anaesthesia, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

George S Bouras (GS)

Department of Anaesthesia, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Alex Zhang (A)

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, Australia.

Alkis Psaltis (A)

Department of Anaesthesia, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Classifications MeSH