Biomechanical comparison of single versus double plate osteosynthesis in acromion type III fractures.
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
acromion fracture
complication
plate osteosynthesis
Journal
Orthopedic reviews
ISSN: 2035-8164
Titre abrégé: Orthop Rev (Pavia)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101524779
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
medline:
20
5
2024
pubmed:
20
5
2024
entrez:
20
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
One of complications of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty is acromion fractures, and its therapy is controversial. The aim of the study was to investigate the double-plate osteosynthesis for these fractures. An acromion type III fracture according to classification of Levy was simulated in 16 human shoulder cadavers, and the specimens were randomly divided into two groups. Single-plate osteosynthesis was performed in the first group (locking compression plate) and double-plate osteosynthesis (locking compression plate and one-third tubular locking plate) in the second group. Biomechanical testing included cycling load and load at failure on a material testing machine. During the test, the translation was measured using an optical tracking system. The load at failure for the single-plate osteosynthesis was 167 N and for the double-osteosynthesis 233.7 N ( Results of the biomechanical study showed that double-plate osteosynthesis had biomechanical properties similar to those of single-plate osteosynthesis for an acromion type III fracture at time point zero. The missing advantages of double-plate osteosynthesis can be explained by the choice of plate configuration.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
One of complications of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty is acromion fractures, and its therapy is controversial. The aim of the study was to investigate the double-plate osteosynthesis for these fractures.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
An acromion type III fracture according to classification of Levy was simulated in 16 human shoulder cadavers, and the specimens were randomly divided into two groups. Single-plate osteosynthesis was performed in the first group (locking compression plate) and double-plate osteosynthesis (locking compression plate and one-third tubular locking plate) in the second group. Biomechanical testing included cycling load and load at failure on a material testing machine. During the test, the translation was measured using an optical tracking system.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The load at failure for the single-plate osteosynthesis was 167 N and for the double-osteosynthesis 233.7 N (
Discussion
UNASSIGNED
Results of the biomechanical study showed that double-plate osteosynthesis had biomechanical properties similar to those of single-plate osteosynthesis for an acromion type III fracture at time point zero. The missing advantages of double-plate osteosynthesis can be explained by the choice of plate configuration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38765296
doi: 10.52965/001c.88396
pii: 88396
pmc: PMC10770366
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
88396Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MFP receives speaker fees from Depuy Synthes, TS is consultant of Depuy Synthes. DN, AD, RK, HH and AE declared to have no conflict of interest.