Management of Patients with Breast Biopsy under Anti-Coagulation or Anti-Platelet Therapy: Results of a Survey of German Experts.

Anti-coagulation Anti-platelet therapy Biopsy Breast Expert survey

Journal

Breast care (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1661-3791
Titre abrégé: Breast Care (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101254060

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 07 03 2023
accepted: 30 12 2023
pmc-release: 01 04 2025
medline: 20 5 2024
pubmed: 20 5 2024
entrez: 20 5 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pre-therapeutic histologic diagnosis through image-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) for suspicious breast findings is a standard procedure. Despite the moderate risk of bleeding, a significant proportion of patients are on temporary or permanent anti-coagulation therapy (ACT) or anti-platelet therapy (APT). Currently, there are no established guidelines for managing biopsies in such patients, leading to varying approaches in clinical practice. An online survey was conducted among all members of the breast ultrasound working group at the German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM) and the working group for breast diagnostics at the German Radiology Society (DRG). It included A total of 332 experts participated, with 51.8% reporting the absence of a standardized management plan for breast biopsies on ACT/APT. Concerning specific ACT/APT medications, the survey revealed discrepancies in risk perception and management: The majority preferred discontinuing medication with directly acting oral anti-coagulants (DOACs; CNB: 66.9%; VAB: 91.1%), phenprocoumon (CNB: 74.9%; VAB: 96.7%), or therapeutic heparin (CNB: 46.1%; VAB: 72.7%). However, there was a lower inclination to discontinue acetylsalicylic acid (ASA; CNB: 15.2%; VAB: 50.3%) or prophylactic heparin (CNB: 11.9%, VAB: 36.3%). Breast biopsies for patients on ASA or prophylactic heparin are deemed safe and part of standard clinical practice. However, despite available feasibility studies, conducting breast biopsies on ACT medications such as DOACs or phenprocoumon appears feasible only for a minority of experts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38765898
doi: 10.1159/000536079
pii: 536079
pmc: PMC11096796
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

87-94

Informations de copyright

© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. All authors are members of one (or both) of the participating working groups.

Auteurs

Fabian Riedel (F)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Markus Hahn (M)

Department for Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.

Werner Bader (W)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Bielefeld OWL University Hospital, Bielefeld, Germany.

Benedikt Schäfgen (B)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Sarah Fastner (S)

Heidelberg Breast Center at the St. Elisabeth Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany.

André Hennigs (A)

Heidelberg Breast Center at the St. Elisabeth Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany.

Christina Gomez (C)

Heidelberg Breast Center at the St. Elisabeth Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany.

Anne Stieber (A)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Christian Fastner (C)

Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Haemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim (UMM), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, European Center for AngioScience (ECAS), and German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

Markus Wallwiener (M)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Michael Golatta (M)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg Breast Center at the St. Elisabeth Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany.

Jörg Heil (J)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg Breast Center at the St. Elisabeth Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany.

Eva Maria Fallenberg (EM)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Classifications MeSH