Testing for extragenital Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis: At-home pharyngeal and rectal self-swabs are non-inferior to those completed in healthcare settings.
Humans
Chlamydia trachomatis
/ isolation & purification
Chlamydia Infections
/ diagnosis
Gonorrhea
/ diagnosis
Male
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
/ isolation & purification
Rectum
/ microbiology
Pharynx
/ microbiology
Specimen Handling
/ methods
Adult
Female
Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
/ methods
Homosexuality, Male
Middle Aged
Self Care
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
28
11
2023
accepted:
12
04
2024
medline:
20
5
2024
pubmed:
20
5
2024
entrez:
20
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia have been increasing in the years preceding the COVID19 pandemic. Because most gonorrhea and chlamydia infections are located in the oropharynx and rectum for men who have sex with men (MSM), and because at-home self-collected swabs for these infections are not licensed by Health Canada or the United States Food and Drug Administration, decreased accessed to in-person care during and since the COVID19 pandemic potentially means missed case findings. To evaluate the performance of at-home self-collected pharyngeal and rectal swabs for gonorrhea and chlamydia nucleic acid amplification testing. All persons who contacted our Sexual Health Clinic and who had a clinical indication to complete oral and/or rectal swabs for gonorrhea and chlamydia were invited to complete at-home swabs in advance of their scheduled appointments. We mailed swabs and instructions to those who consented. Participants brought these swabs to their scheduled in clinic appointments, where we repeated the same swabs. All matching swabs were sent to the laboratory for analysis to determine concordance. From September 8, 2022 to July 18, 2023, we enrolled 296 eligible participants who provided 1184 swabs. For analysis, cancelled specimens and specimens with invalid results were excluded, leaving 1032 swabs for comparison. We identified 66 STI diagnoses in 47 unique participants. Overall accuracy was high (exceeding 99%), except for rectal chlamydia, which was 96.0%. While the performance of self-swabs for chlamydia was lower compared to gonorrhea, at-home swabs identified six chlamydia infections that were missed by in-clinic collected swabs (two pharyngeal, four rectal). Removing these six cases as "false positives" increased overall accuracy for chlamydia detection to 99.7% (pharyngeal) and 97.8% (rectal). Self-collected at-home swabs had good performance acceptable for gonorrhea and chlamydia nucleic acid amplification testing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38768150
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302785
pii: PONE-D-23-39438
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0302785Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2024 Orser et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.