Effect of prolonged pressure equalization on final drifting during pressure wire studies.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 05 2024
20 05 2024
Historique:
received:
13
08
2023
accepted:
16
05
2024
medline:
21
5
2024
pubmed:
21
5
2024
entrez:
20
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pressure drifting is a troublesome error in invasive coronary function tests. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between prolonged and short-time pressure equalizations in pressure drifting. Pressure drifting was defined as the pressure gradient between the mean pressure of the distal wire sensor (Pd) and aortic pressure (Pa) when the wire was withdrawn to the tip of the guiding catheter. Significant drifts 1 and 2 were defined as the absolute values of pressure gradients > 2 and > 3 mmHg, respectively. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the associations between prolonged pressure equalization and each pressure drifting. The prolonged pressure equalization strategy was associated with a lower incidence of drift 1 than the short-time pressure equalization strategy (6.84% vs. 16.92%, p < 0.05). However, no statistical differences were found in the incidence of drift 2 between the prolonged and short-time pressure equalization strategies (4.27% vs. 7.69%, p = 0.34). In the multivariable regression model, only the prolonged pressure equalization strategy predicted a lower incidence of pressure drift 1. In conclusion, the prolonged pressure equalization strategy was associated with a lower incidence of significant pressure drifting with more stringent thresholds than the short-time pressure equalization strategy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38769360
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62440-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-62440-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11504Subventions
Organisme : National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
ID : 111-HCH067
Organisme : National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
ID : 111-HCH103
Organisme : National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
ID : 112-HCH106
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Neumann, F. J. et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur. Heart J. 40, 87–165 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
pubmed: 30165437
Parikh, R. V. et al. Utilization and outcomes of measuring fractional flow reserve in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 75, 409–419 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.060
pubmed: 32000953
Pijls, N. H. & Bruyne, B. D. Fractional flow reserve, coronary pressure wires, and drift. Circ. J. 80, 1704–1706 (2016).
doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0623
pubmed: 27430249
Matsumura, M. et al. Accuracy of fractional flow reserve measurements in clinical practice: Observations from a core laboratory analysis. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 10, 1392–1401 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.031
pubmed: 28728652
Cook, C. M. et al. Quantification of the effect of pressure wire drift on the diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and whole-cycle Pd/Pa. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 9, e002988 (2016).
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002988
pubmed: 27076571
pmcid: 4836560
Fearon, W. F. et al. ACIST-FFR study (assessment of catheter-based interrogation and standard techniques for fractional flow reserve measurement). Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 10, e005905 (2017).
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005905
pubmed: 29246917
pmcid: 5753822
Stables, R. H. et al. A randomised controlled trial to compare two coronary pressure wires using simultaneous measurements in human coronary arteries: The COMET trial. EuroIntervention 14, e1578–e1584 (2019).
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00786
pubmed: 30375339
Cottens, D. et al. FFR pressure wire comparative study for drift: Piezo resistive versus optical sensor. Am. J. Cardiovasc. Dis. 12, 42–52 (2022).
pubmed: 35291508
pmcid: 8918737
Casadonte, L., Piek, J. J., VanBavel, E., Spaan, J. A. E. & Siebes, M. Discordance between pressure drift after wire pullback and intracoronary distal pressure offset affects stenosis physiology appraisal. Int. J. Cardiol. 277, 29–34 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.051
pubmed: 30173920
Toth, G. G. et al. Standardization of fractional flow reserve measurements. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 68, 742–753 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.067
pubmed: 27515335
Jong, C. B. et al. Efficacy and safety of high-dose intracoronary adenosine injection in fractional flow reserve assessment. Acta Cardiol. Sin. 38, 553–563 (2022).
pubmed: 36176362
pmcid: 9479048
Davies, J. E. et al. Use of the instantaneous wave-free ratio or fractional flow reserve in PCI. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 1824–1834 (2017).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700445
pubmed: 28317458
Wakasa, N. et al. Impact of pressure signal drift on fractional flow reserve-based decision-making for patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Circ. J. 80, 1812–1819 (2016).
doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1195
pubmed: 27349899