The influence of Zircos-E® etchant, silica coating, and alumina air-particle abrasion on the debonding resistance of endocrowns with three different preparation designs.
Zirconia endocrowns
Zircos‐E® etch
airborne‐particle abrasion
debonding resistance
Journal
Clinical and experimental dental research
ISSN: 2057-4347
Titre abrégé: Clin Exp Dent Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101692332
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Jun 2024
Historique:
revised:
25
04
2024
received:
05
01
2024
accepted:
06
05
2024
medline:
21
5
2024
pubmed:
21
5
2024
entrez:
21
5
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The study aimed to evaluate the debonding resistance of three different endocrown designs on molar teeth, using three different zirconia surface pretreatments. Ninety human mandibular first molars were divided into three main groups: endocrowns without ferrule, with 1 mm ferrule, and with 2 mm ferrule. The subgroups were defined by their surface pretreatment method used (n = 15): 50 μm alumina air-particle abrasion, silica coating using 30 μm Cojet™ particles, and Zircos-E® etching. The endocrowns were fabricated using multilayer zirconia ceramic, cemented with self-adhesive resin cement, and subjected to 5000 thermocycles (5-55°C) before debonding. The data obtained were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA. All test specimens survived the thermocyclic aging. The results indicated that both the preparation design and the surface treatment had a significant impact on the resistance to debonding of the endocrowns (p < .001). The 2 mm ferrule followed by the 1 mm ferrule designs exhibited the highest debonding resistance, both were superior to the endocrown without ferrule. Zircos-E® etching and silica coating yielded comparable debonding resistance, which were significantly higher than alumina air-particle abrasion. All endocrowns demonstrated a favorable failure mode. All designs and surface treatments showed high debonding resistance for a single restoration. However, ferrule designs with Zircos-E® etching or silica coating may represent better clinical options compared to the nonferrule design or alumina airborne-particle abrasion. Nonetheless, further research, including fatigue testing and evaluations with different luting agents is recommended.
Substances chimiques
zirconium oxide
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e901Subventions
Organisme : None
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Ahmed, M. A. A., Kern, M., Mourshed, B., Wille, S., & Chaar, M. S. (2022). Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with different endocrown designs and materials after artificial ageing. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 66(1), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00082
Alghauli, M. A., Alqutaibi, A. Y., & Borzangy, S. (2024). Clinical benefits of immediate dentin sealing: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.014
Alghauli, M. A., Alqutaibi, A. Y., Wille, S., & Kern, M. (2023). Clinical reliability of self‐adhesive luting resins compared to other adhesive procedures: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Dentistry, 129, 104394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104394
Alghauli, M. A., Wille, S., Lehmann, F., & Kern, M. (2023). Survival and debonding resistance of posterior cantilever resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses for moderately and severely worn dentition during thermomechanical loading. Dental Materials, 39(7), 634–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.05.006
Alqutaibi, A. Y., Ghulam, O., Krsoum, M., Binmahmoud, S., Taher, H., Elmalky, W., & Zafar, M. S. (2022). Revolution of current dental zirconia: A comprehensive review. Molecules, 27(5), 1699. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27051699
Altan, B., Cinar, S., & Tuncelli, B. (2019). Evaluation of shear bond strength of zirconia‐based monolithic CAD‐CAM materials to resin cement after different surface treatments. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 22(11), 1475–1482. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_157_19
Belleflamme, M. M., Geerts, S. O., Louwette, M. M., Grenade, C. F., Vanheusden, A. J., & Mainjot, A. K. (2017). No post‐no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: An up to 10‐year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases. Journal of Dentistry, 63, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.009
Bielen, V., Inokoshi, M., Munck, J. D., Zhang, F., Vanmeensel, K., Minakuchi, S., Vleugels, J., Naert, I., & Van Meerbeek, B. (2015). Bonding effectiveness to differently sandblasted dental zirconia. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 17(3), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a34401
Bindl, A., & Mörmann, W. H. (1999). Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo‐crowns after 2 years‐‐preliminary results. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 1(3), 255–265.
Bindl, A., Richter, B., & Mörmann, W. H. (2005). Survival of ceramic computer‐aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 18(3), 219–224.
Buyukerkmen, E. B., Bozkurt, D. A., & Terlemez, A. (2022). Effect of surface treatment, ferrule height, and luting agent type on pull‐out bond strength of monolithic zirconia endocrowns. Journal of Oral Science, 64(4), 279–282. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.22-0147
Carvalho, M. A., Lazari, P. C., Gresnigt, M., Del Bel Cury, A. A., & Magne, P. (2018). Current options concerning the endodontically‐treated teeth restoration with the adhesive approach. Brazilian Oral Research, 32(Suppl. 1), e74. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0074
Chen, Y. C., & Fok, A. (2023). Shape optimization of a 2‐unit cantilevered posterior resin‐bonded fixed dental prosthesis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 129(1), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.027
da Silva, B. T. F., Trevelin, L. T., Schroeter, A. C., Willers, A. E., Cesar, P. F., & Matos, A. B. (2021). Effect of silica coating and laser treatment on the flexural strength, surface characteristics, and bond strength of a dental zirconia. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 129(1), e12754. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12754
Dartora, N. R., Maurício Moris, I. C., Poole, S. F., Bacchi, A., Sousa‐Neto, M. D., Silva‐Sousa, Y. T., & Gomes, E. A. (2021). Mechanical behavior of endocrowns fabricated with different CAD‐CAM ceramic systems. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 125(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.008
Deepa, V. L., Damaraju, B., Priyadharsini, B. I., Subbarao, V. V., & Raju, K. R. (2014a). Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of 5(th), 6(th) and 7(th) generation bonding agents to coronal dentin versus dentin at floor of pulp chamber: An in vitro study. Journal of International Oral Health: JIOH, 6(5), 72–76.
Deepa, V. L., Damaraju, B., Priyadharsini, B. I., Subbarao, V. V., & Raju, K. R. (2014b). Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of 5(th), 6(th) and 7(th) generation bonding agents to coronal dentin versus dentin at floor of pulp chamber: An in vitro study. Journal of International Oral Health, 6(5), 72–76.
Dietschi, D., Duc, O., Krejci, I., & Sadan, A. (2008). Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany: 1985), 39(2), 117–129.
Dioguardi, M., Alovisi, M., Comba, A., Baldi, A., Troiano, G., Cadenaro, M., Mazzoni, A., Breschi, L., Lo Muzio, L., & Scotti, N. (2022). The influence of indirect bonded restorations on clinical prognosis of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Dental Materials, 38(8), e203–e219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.018
Einhorn, M., DuVall, N., Wajdowicz, M., Brewster, J., & Roberts, H. (2019). Preparation ferrule design effect on endocrown failure resistance. Journal of Prosthodontics, 28(1), e237–e242. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12671
El‐Ma'aita, A., A. Al‐Rabab'ah, M., Abu‐Awwad, M., Hattar, S., & Devlin, H. (2022). Endocrowns clinical performance and patient satisfaction: A randomized clinical trial of three monolithic ceramic restorations. Journal of Prosthodontics, 31(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13414
Eltoukhy, R. I., Elkaffas, A. A., Ali, A. I., & Mahmoud, S. H. (2021). Indirect resin composite inlays cemented with a self‐adhesive, self‐etch or a conventional resin cement luting agent: A 5 years prospective clinical evaluation. Journal of Dentistry, 112, 103740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103740
Emam, Z. N., Elsayed, S. M., Abu‐Nawareg, M., Zidan, A. Z., Abuelroos, E. M., Shokier, H., Fansa, H. A., Elsisi, H. A., & ElBanna, K. A. (2023). Retention of different all ceramic endocrown materials cemented with two different adhesive techniques. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 27(6), 2232–2240. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202303_31757
Ferrari, M., Pontoriero, D. I. K., Ferrari Cagidiaco, E., & Carboncini, F. (2022). Restorative difficulty evaluation system of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 34(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12880
Gaintantzopoulou, M., & El‐Damanhoury, H. (2016). Effect of preparation depth on the marginal and internal adaptation of computer‐aided design/computer‐assisted manufacture endocrowns. Operative Dentistry, 41(6), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-146-l
Gan, H., Sun, S., Tian, R., Liu, F., Li, J., & Xie, X. (2023). In vitro analysis of the influence of different tooth positions and retention depths of the pulp cavity on the accuracy of digital impression of the endocrown. Journal of Southern Medical University, 43(11), 1941–1946. https://doi.org/10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2023.11.15
Ghodsi, S., Shekarian, M., Aghamohseni, M. M., Rasaeipour, S., & Arzani, S. (2023). Resin cement selection for different types of fixed partial coverage restorations: A narrative systematic review. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, 9(6), 1096–1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.761
Gurpinar, B., & Tak, O. (2022). Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 127(3), 430–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.034
Hansen, N. A., Wille, S., & Kern, M. (2020). Effect of reduced airborne‐particle abrasion pressure on the retention of zirconia copings resin bonded to titanium abutments. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 124(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.001
Haralur, S. B., Alamrey, A. A., Alshehri, S. A., Alzahrani, D. S., & Alfarsi, M. (2020). Effect of different preparation designs and all ceramic materials on fracture strength of molar endocrowns. Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials, 18, 2280800020947329. https://doi.org/10.1177/2280800020947329
Hayes, A., Duvall, N., Wajdowicz, M., & Roberts, H. (2017). Effect of endocrown pulp chamber extension depth on molar fracture resistance. Operative Dentistry, 42(3), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-097-l
Kijsamanmith, K., Timpawat, S., Harnirattisai, C., & Messer, H. H. (2002). Micro‐tensile bond strengths of bonding agents to pulpal floor dentine. International Endodontic Journal, 35(10), 833–839.
Kumbuloglu, O., Lassila, L. V. J., User, A., & Vallittu, P. K. (2006). Bonding of resin composite luting cements to zirconium oxide by two air‐particle abrasion methods. Operative Dentistry, 31(2), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-22
Lee, K., Ahlowalia, M., Alfayate, R. P., Patel, S., & Foschi, F. (2023). Prevalence of and factors associated with vertical root fracture in a Japanese population: An observational study on teeth with isolated periodontal probing depth. Journal of Endodontics, 49(12), 1617–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2023.08.018
Lin, Z. X., Pan, Z. X., Ye, Q. Q., Zheng, Z. Q., & Lin, J. (2020). Effect of occlusal thickness design on the fracture resistance of endocrowns restored with lithium disilicate ceramic and zirconia. Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China Journal of Stomatology, 38(6), 647–651. https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2020.06.007
Mangold, J. T., & Kern, M. (2011). Influence of glass‐fiber posts on the fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated premolars with varying substance loss: An in vitro study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 105(6), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(11)60080-2
Mannocci, F., Bhuva, B., Roig, M., Zarow, M., & Bitter, K. (2021). European Society of Endodontology position statement: The restoration of root filled teeth. International Endodontic Journal, 54(11), 1974–1981. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13607
Morimoto, S., Fraga, R. M., Tedesco, T. K., Özcan, M., Sampaio, F., & Raggio, D. P. (2022). Two‐year survival of ceramic endocrowns and partial coverage ceramic restorations with fiber post: A 2‐year double‐blind randomized clinical trial. The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 30(4), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2374Morimoto10
Otto, T., & Mörmann, W. H. (2015). Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramic posterior shoulder crowns and endocrowns up to 12 years. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, 18(2), 147–161.
Peumans, M., Voet, M., De Munck, J., Van Landuyt, K., Van Ende, A., & Van Meerbeek, B. (2013). Four‐year clinical evaluation of a self‐adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays. Clinical Oral Investigations, 17(3), 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0762-9
Pissis, P. (1995). Fabrication of a metal‐free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry: PPAD, 7(5), 83–94.
Queiroz, J. R., Botelho, M. A., Sousa, S. A., Martinelli, A. E., & Özcan, M. (2015). Evaluation of spatial and functional roughness parameters on air‐abraded zirconia as a function of particle type and deposition pressure. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 17(1), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a33503
Sadid‐Zadeh, R., Strazzella, A., Li, R., & Makwoka, S. (2021). Effect of zirconia etching solution on the shear bond strength between zirconia and resin cement. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 126(5), 693–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.016
Saker, S., Alqutaibi, A. Y., Alghauli, M. A., Hashem, D., Borzangy, S., Farghal, A. E., Alnazzawi, A. A., Ainoosah, S., & AbdElaziz, M. H. (2024). The influence of ferrule design and pulpal extensions on the accuracy of fit and the fracture resistance of Zirconia‐reinforced lithium silicate endocrowns. Materials, 17(6), 1411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061411
Sales, A., Rodrigues, S. J., Mahesh, M., Ginjupalli, K., Shetty, T., Pai, U. Y., Saldanha, S., Hegde, P., Mukherjee, S., Kamath, V., Bajantri, P., Srikant, N., & Kotian, R. (2022). Effect of different surface treatments on the micro‐shear bond strength and surface characteristics of zirconia: An in vitro study. International Journal of Dentistry, 2022, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1546802
Scholz, K. J., Tabenski, I. M., Vogl, V., Cieplik, F., Schmalz, G., Buchalla, W., Hiller, K. A., & Federlin, M. (2021). Randomized clinical split‐mouth study on the performance of CAD/CAM‐partial ceramic crowns luted with a self‐adhesive resin cement or a universal adhesive and a conventional resin cement after 39 months. Journal of Dentistry, 115, 103837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103837
Shimoe, S., Peng, T. Y., Otaku, M., Tsumura, N., Iwaguro, S., & Satoda, T. (2019). Influence of various airborne‐particle abrasion conditions on bonding between zirconia ceramics and an indirect composite resin material. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 122(5), 491.e1–491.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.08.016
Shin, Y., Park, S., Park, J.‐W., Kim, K.‐M., Park, Y.‐B., & Roh, B.‐D. (2017). Evaluation of the marginal and internal discrepancies of CAD‐CAM endocrowns with different cavity depths: An in vitro study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 117(1), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.025
Sokolowski, G., Szczesio‐Wlodarczyk, A., Szynkowska‐Jóźwik, M. I., Stopa, W., Sokolowski, J., Kopacz, K., & Bociong, K. (2023). The shear bond strength of resin‐based luting cement to zirconia ceramics after different surface treatments. Materials, 16(15), 5433. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155433
Soliman, M., Alshamrani, L., Yahya, B., Alajlan, G., Aldegheishem, A., & Eldwakhly, E. (2021). Monolithic endocrown vs. hybrid intraradicular post/core/crown restorations for endodontically treated teeth; cross‐sectional study. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(11), 6523–6531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.07.020
Thammajaruk, P., Blatz, M. B., Buranadham, S., Guazzato, M., & Wang, Y. (2020). Shear bond strength of composite cement to alumina‐coated versus tribochemical silica‐treated zirconia. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 105, 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103710
Yang, B., Barloi, A., & Kern, M. (2010). Influence of air‐abrasion on zirconia ceramic bonding using an adhesive composite resin. Dental Materials, 26(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.008
Yang, L., Chen, B., Xie, H., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., & Chen, C. (2018). Durability of resin bonding to zirconia using products containing 10‐Methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 20(4), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a40989
Zou, Y., Zhan, D., Xiang, J., & Li, L. (2022). Clinical research on restorations using CAD/CAM‐fabricated monolithic zirconia endocrowns and post and core crowns after up to 5 years. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, 25(3), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599661