Assessing the impact of CHARM2, a family planning program on gender attitudes, intimate partner violence, reproductive coercion, and marital quality in India.


Journal

PLOS global public health
ISSN: 2767-3375
Titre abrégé: PLOS Glob Public Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918283779606676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 23 09 2023
accepted: 17 04 2024
medline: 21 5 2024
pubmed: 21 5 2024
entrez: 21 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Using a two-armed cluster randomised controlled trial, CHARM2 (Counselling Husbands to Achieve Reproductive health and Marital equity), a 5-session gender equity and family planning intervention for couples in rural India, showed an impact on family planning outcomes in primary trial analyses. This study examines its effects on gender-equitable attitudes, intimate partner violence, reproductive coercion, and marital quality. We used multilevel mixed-effects models to assess the intervention impact on each outcome. Both male (aIRR at 9 months: 0.64, C.I.: 0.45,0.90; aIRR at 18 months: 0.25, C.I.: 0.18,0.39) and female (aIRR at 9 months: 0.57, C.I.: 0.46,0.71; aIRR at 18 months: 0.38, C.I.: 0.23,0.61) intervention participants were less likely than corresponding control participants to endorse attitudes accepting physical IPV at 9- and 18-month follow-ups. Men in the intervention, compared to those in the control condition, reported more gender-equitable attitudes at 9- and 18 months (ß at 9 months: 0.13, C.I.: 0.06,0.20; ß at 18 months: 0.26, C.I.: 0.19,0.34) and higher marital quality at the 18-month follow-up (ß: 0.03, C.I.: 0.01,0.05). However, we found no effects on women's experiences of IPV, reproductive coercion, or marital quality. CHARM2 shows promise in improving men's and women's attitudes towards gender equality and male perceptions of marital quality. Still, IPV and reproductive coercion reductions may require more intensive programming than that provided within this 5-session model focused on family planning.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38771823
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003220
pii: PGPH-D-23-01761
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e0003220

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Chatterji et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Sangeeta Chatterji (S)

School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Nicole E Johns (NE)

Center on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.

Mohan Ghule (M)

Center on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.

Shahina Begum (S)

ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, India.

Sarah Averbach (S)

Center on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.

Madhusudana Battala (M)

Population Council, New Delhi, India.

Anita Raj (A)

Center on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Newcomb Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.
School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.

Classifications MeSH