Ensuring accuracy in the development and application of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for infectious disease.
Diagnosis
IVD
In vitro diagnostics
Infectious disease
MDx
Molecular diagnosis
NAAT
Nucleic acid amplification test
PCR
Pathogen
TPP
Target product profile
Journal
Molecular aspects of medicine
ISSN: 1872-9452
Titre abrégé: Mol Aspects Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7603128
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 May 2024
20 May 2024
Historique:
received:
15
11
2023
revised:
29
03
2024
accepted:
22
04
2024
medline:
22
5
2024
pubmed:
22
5
2024
entrez:
21
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Diagnostic tests were heralded as crucial during the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic with most of the key methods using bioanalytical approaches that detected larger molecules (RNA, protein antigens or antibodies) rather than conventional clinical biochemical techniques. Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs), like the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), and other molecular methods, like sequencing (that often work in combination with NAATs), were essential to the diagnosis and management during COVID-19. This was exemplified both early in the pandemic but also later on, following the emergence of new genetic SARS-CoV-2 variants. The 100 day mission to respond to future pandemic threats highlights the need for effective diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines. Of the three, diagnostics represents the first opportunity to manage infectious diseases while also being the most poorly supported in terms of the infrastructure needed to demonstrate effectiveness. Where performance targets exist, they are not well served by consensus on how to demonstrate they are being met; this includes analytical factors such as limit of detection (LOD) false positive results as well as how to approach clinical evaluation. The selection of gold standards or use of epidemiological factors such as predictive value, reference ranges or clinical thresholds are seldom correctly considered. The attention placed on molecular diagnostic tests during COVID-19 illustrates important considerations and assumptions on the use of these methods for infectious disease diagnosis and beyond. In this manuscript, we discuss state-of-the-art approaches to diagnostic evaluation and explore how they may be better tailored to diagnostic techniques like NAATs to maximise the impact of these highly versatile bioanalytical tools, both generally and during future outbreaks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38772082
pii: S0098-2997(24)00034-7
doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2024.101275
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101275Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.