Genome sequencing reanalysis increases the diagnostic yield in dystonia.
Diagnostic yield
Dystonia
Genome sequencing
Reanalysis
Journal
Parkinsonism & related disorders
ISSN: 1873-5126
Titre abrégé: Parkinsonism Relat Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9513583
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 May 2024
14 May 2024
Historique:
received:
14
01
2024
revised:
15
03
2024
accepted:
12
05
2024
medline:
22
5
2024
pubmed:
22
5
2024
entrez:
21
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
We investigated the contribution of genomic data reanalysis to the diagnostic yield of dystonia patients who remained undiagnosed after prior genome sequencing. Probands with heterogeneous dystonia phenotypes who underwent initial genome sequencing (GS) analysis in 2019 were included in the reanalysis, which was performed through gene-specific discovery collaborations and systematic genomic data reanalysis. Initial GS analysis in 2019 (n = 111) identified a molecular diagnosis in 11.7 % (13/111) of cases. Reanalysis between 2020 and 2023 increased the diagnostic yield by 7.2 % (8/111); 3.6 % (4/111) through focused gene-specific clinical correlation collaborative efforts [VPS16 (two probands), AOPEP and POLG], and 3.6 % (4/111) by systematic reanalysis completed in 2023 [NUS1 (two probands) and DDX3X variants, and a microdeletion encompassing VPS16]. Seven of these patients had a high phenotype-based dystonia score ≥3. Notable unverified findings in four additional cases included suspicious variants of uncertain significance in FBXL4 and EIF2AK2, and potential phenotypic expansion associated with SLC2A1 and TREX1 variants. GS data reanalysis increased the diagnostic yield from 11.7 % to 18.9 %, with potential extension up to 22.5 %. While optimal timing for diagnostic reanalysis remains to be determined, this study demonstrates that periodic re-interrogation of dystonia GS datasets can provide additional genetic diagnoses, which may have significant implications for patients and their families.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38772265
pii: S1353-8020(24)01022-8
doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.107010
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107010Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Kishore Raj Kumar reports financial support was provided by the Ainsworth 4 Foundation. Stephen Tisch reports a relationship with Medtronic that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Stephen Tisch reports a relationship with Boston Scientific that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Stephen Tisch reports a relationship with Seqirus Pharmaceuticals that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Carolyn M. Sue reports a relationship with Living Cell Technologies Ltd. that includes: consulting or advisory. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.