The impact of early weight-bearing on results following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Humans
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
/ rehabilitation
Retrospective Studies
Female
Weight-Bearing
/ physiology
Male
Adult
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
/ surgery
Young Adult
Treatment Outcome
Range of Motion, Articular
Arthroscopy
/ adverse effects
Recovery of Function
Anterior Cruciate Ligament
/ surgery
Knee Joint
/ surgery
Adolescent
Anterior cruciate ligament
Arthroscopic reconstruction
Body mass index
Early weight bearing
Rehabilitation
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 May 2024
21 May 2024
Historique:
received:
05
11
2023
accepted:
15
05
2024
medline:
22
5
2024
pubmed:
22
5
2024
entrez:
21
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are common injuries that typically affect young, physically active individuals and may require surgical reconstruction. Studies have shown that the long time success of ACL reconstruction depends on the surgical technique and the postoperative rehabilitation strategy. However, there is still no consensus on the content of rehabilitation programs. Hence, additional research is required to elucidate the significance of early weight-bearing in the rehabilitation process following ACL reconstruction. The aim of this article is to examine the impact of weight-bearing on the clinical results of ACL reconstruction. We retrospectively reviewed patient records who had undergone arthroscopic reconstruction using a semitendinosus-gracilis tendon graft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture between January 2018 and December 2020. The study included the data of 110 patients. The patients were split into two groups: Group 1 underwent early weight-bearing, while Group 2 followed a non-weight-bearing regimen for three weeks. We assessed the patients using the anterior drawer test, Lachman test, range of motion, Lysholm knee scale, Cincinnati scale, Tegner scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form and clinical records. Analytical tests were conducted to compare the results. The complication rates did not show a significant difference between the groups. Group 1 had higher frequencies of positive anterior drawer and Lachman tests. The Lysholm and Cincinnati knee scores of patients in Group 1 were notably lower than those of patients in Group 2. Additionally, the Tegner activity scores and IKDC scores of patients in Group 1 were also meaningfully lower than those of patients in Group 2. In Group 1 patients, there was no notable relationship observed between body mass index (BMI) and the results of the anterior drawer test (ADT) or Lachman test. However, patients with a BMI of 25 or higher in Group 1 showed a decrease in postoperative IKDC scores. In Group 2 patients, no significant relationship was identified between BMI and either the ADT or the Lachman test outcome. Based on current literature and current rehabilitation guidelines following ACL reconstruction, the decision to initiate early weight-bearing is based on a limited number of studies with low levels of evidence. In our study, we found that patients who followed a non-weight-bearing regimen for 3 weeks after surgery had better mid-term results than those who were allowed to bear weight early. It appears that further prospective studies on this topic are needed to update rehabilitation guidelines in the next.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38773398
doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07525-8
pii: 10.1186/s12891-024-07525-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
395Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
DiMiceli R, Marambio CB, Zati A, Monesi R, Benedetti MG. Do knee bracingand delayed weight-term functional outcome after Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Reconstruction? Joints. 2017;5(4):202–6.
doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606617
Gianotti SM, Marshall SW, Hume PA, Bunt L. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study. J SciMedSport. 2009;12(6):622–7.
Van Melick N, vanCingel RE, Brooijmans F, Neeter C, vanTienen T, Hullegie W, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW. Evidence-: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(24):1506–15.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095898
pubmed: 27539507
Wright RW, Haas AK, Anderson J, Calabrese G, Cavanaugh J, Hewett TE, Lorring D, McKenzie C, Preston E, Williams G, MOON Group. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation: MOON guidelines. Sports Health. 2015;7(3):239–43.
doi: 10.1177/1941738113517855
pubmed: 26131301
pmcid: 4482298
Lie MM, Risberg MA, Storheim K, Engebretsen L, Øiestad BE. What’sthe rate of knee osteoarthritis 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury? An updated systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(18):1162–7.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099751
pubmed: 30936063
Kim JG, Kim WS, Kim SG, Lee DH. Accelerated Versus non-accelerated Rehabilitation after Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using hamstring autografts: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of comparative studies. IndianJOrthop. 2021;55(2):405–15.
Makhni EC, Crump EK, Steinhaus ME, Verma NN, Ahmad CS, Cole BJ, Bach BR Jr. Quality and variability of online available physical therapy protocols from academic orthopaedic surgery programs for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(8):16–21.
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.033
Andrade R, Pereira R, vanCingel R, Staal JB, Espregueira-Mendes J. How should clinicians rehabilitate patients after ACL reconstruction? A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) with a focus on quality appraisal (AGREE II). Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(9):512–9.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100310
pubmed: 31175108
Maak TG, Voos JE, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Tunnelwidening in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J AmAcadOrthopSurg. 2010;18(11):695–706.
Yu JK, Paessler HH. Relationship between tunnel widening and different rehabilitation procedures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendons. ChinMed J (Engl). 2005;118(4):320–6.
Wright RW, Preston E, Fleming BC, Amendola A, Andrish JT, Bergfeld JA, Dunn WR, Kaeding C, Kuhn JE, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Parker RC, Spindler KP, Wolcott M, Wolf BR, Williams GN. A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: part I: continuous passive motion, early weight bearing, postoperative bracing, and home-based rehabilitation. J KneeSurg. 2008;21(3):217–24.
Tyler TF, McHugh MP, Gleim GW, Nicholas SJ. Theeffect of immediate weight bearing after anterior cruciate ligamentre construction. ClinOrthopRelatRes. 1998;(357):141–8.
Luque-Seron JA, Medina-Porqueres I. Anterior cruciate ligament strain in vivo: a systematic review. Sports Health. 2016;8(5):451–5.
doi: 10.1177/1941738116658006
pubmed: 27418161
pmcid: 5010130
Jenkins SM, Guzman A, Gardner BB, Bryant SA, Del Sol SR, McGahan P, Chen J. Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: review of current literature and recommendations. CurrRevMusculoskeletMed. 2022;15(3):170–9.
Tajima T, Yamaguchi N, Nagasawa M, Morita Y, Nakamura Y, Chosa E. Earlyweight-bearing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring grafts induce femoral bone tunnel enlargement: a prospective clinical and radiographic study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):274.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2653-6
pubmed: 31159789
pmcid: 6547478
Zhu W, Wang D, Han Y, Zhang N, Zeng Y. Anteriorcruciateligament (ACL) auto graft reconstruction with hamstring tendons: clinical research among three rehabilitation procedures. Eur J OrthopSurgTraumatol. 2013;23(8):939–43.
Shen X, Qin Y, Zuo J, Liu T, Xiao J. A systematic review of risk factors for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction failure. Int J Sports Med. 2021;42(8):682–93.
doi: 10.1055/a-1393-6282
pubmed: 33784786