Retrospective analysis of the human-centered design process used to develop a clinical decision support in the emergency department: PE Dx Study Part 2.

Clinical decision support Health IT Human-centered design Retrospective analysis Usability evaluation

Journal

Human factors in healthcare
ISSN: 2772-5014
Titre abrégé: Hum Factors Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918402387406676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
pmc-release: 01 12 2024
medline: 22 5 2024
pubmed: 22 5 2024
entrez: 22 5 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

With the growing implementation and use of health IT such as Clinical Decision Support (CDS), there is increasing attention on the potential negative impact of these technologies on patients (e.g., medication errors) and clinicians (e.g., increased workload, decreased job satisfaction, burnout). Human-Centered Design (HCD) and Human Factors (HF) principles are recommended to improve the usability of health IT and reduce its negative impact on patients and clinicians; however, challenges persist. The objective of this study is to understand how an HCD process influences the usability of health IT. We conducted a systematic retrospective analysis of the HCD process used in the design of a CDS for pulmonary embolism diagnosis in the emergency department (ED). Guided by the usability outcomes (e.g., barriers and facilitators) of the CDS use "in the wild" (see Part 1 of this research in the accompanying manuscript), we performed deductive content analysis of 17 documents (e.g., design session transcripts) produced during the HCD process. We describe if and how the design team considered the barriers and facilitators during the HCD process. We identified 7 design outcomes of the HCD process, for instance designing a workaround and making a design change to the CDS. We identify gaps in the current HCD process and demonstrate the need for a continuous health IT design process.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38774123
doi: 10.1016/j.hfh.2023.100055
pmc: PMC11104061
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Megan Salwei reports financial support was provided by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Brian Patterson reports financial support was provided by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Pascale Carayon reports financial support was provided by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Auteurs

Megan E Salwei (ME)

Center for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety, Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Peter L T Hoonakker (PLT)

Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Michael Pulia (M)

Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Douglas Wiegmann (D)

Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Brian W Patterson (BW)

Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Pascale Carayon (P)

Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Classifications MeSH