Comparative review of vasectomy guidelines and novel vasal occlusion techniques.
best practices
contraception
vas occlusion
vasectomy
Journal
Andrology
ISSN: 2047-2927
Titre abrégé: Andrology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101585129
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 May 2024
22 May 2024
Historique:
revised:
03
04
2024
received:
14
02
2024
accepted:
07
05
2024
medline:
22
5
2024
pubmed:
22
5
2024
entrez:
22
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Vasectomy is the most commonly performed urologic procedure in the United States and is a highly effective form of male contraception. The introduction of guidelines by urological societies has standardized vasectomy care. Providers should be awadre of the rationale behind these guidelines, as well as key differences among them. While few major changes to vasectomy technique have been adopted over the past 40 years, new, reversible vasal occlusive technologies may affect delivery of male contraceptive care in the future. Here, we perform a comparative review of vasectomy guidelines from six urological societies worldwide. In addition, we report on the status of several experimental vasal occlusion methods that may be available in the next decade.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.
Références
Amory JK. Male contraception. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(6):1303‐1309. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.036
Jacobstein R, Radloff S, Khan F, et al. Down but not out: vasectomy is faring poorly almost everywhere—we can do better to make it a true method option. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023;11(1):e2200369. doi:10.9745/GHSP‐D‐22‐00369
Bole R, Lundy SD, Pei E, Bajic P, Parekh N, Vij SC. Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States. Int J Impot Res. 2024;36:265‐268. doi:10.1038/s41443‐023‐00672‐x
Sharlip ID, Belker AM, Honig S, et al. Vasectomy: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2012;188(Suppl 6):2482‐2491. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.080
Dohle GR, Diemer T, Kopa Z, Krausz C, Giwercman A, Jungwirth A. European Association of Urology guidelines on vasectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;61(1):159‐163. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.001
Zini A, Grantmyre J, Chow V, Chan P. 2022 Canadian Urological Association best practice report: vasectomy. CUAJ. 2022;16(5):E231‐E236. doi:10.5489/cuaj.7860
Hupertan V, Graziana JP, Schoentgen N, et al. Recommandations du Comité d'Andrologie et de Médecine Sexuelle de l'AFU concernant la prise en charge de la vasectomie. Progrès en Urol. 2023;33(5):223‐236. doi:10.1016/j.purol.2022.12.014
Wang C, Meriggiola MC, Amory JK, et al. Practice and development of male contraception: European Academy of Andrology and American Society of Andrology guidelines. Andrology. Published online September 20, 2023. doi:10.1111/andr.13525
Doolittle J, Jackson EM, Gill B, Vij SC. The omission of genitourinary physical exam in telehealth pre‐vasectomy consults does not reduce rates of office procedure completion. Urology. 2022;167:19‐23. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2022.05.038
Anderson DJ, Lucero M, Vining S, et al. Vasectomy regret or lack thereof. Health Psychol Res. 2022;10(3):38241. doi:10.52965/001c.38241
Cook LA, Pun A, Gallo MF, Lopez LM, Vliet HAV. Scalpel versus no‐scalpel incision for vasectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(3):CD004112. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004112.pub4
Shapiro EI, Silber SJ. Open‐ended vasectomy, sperm granuloma, and postvasectomy orchialgia. Fertil Steril. 1979;32(5):546‐550. doi:10.1016/s0015‐0282(16)44357‐8
Doolittle J, Kansal J, Dietrich P, et al. Is opioid‐free post‐vasectomy analgesia a pain? A single surgeon experience. Urology. 2021;154:40‐44. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.050
Welk B, McClure JA, Clarke C, Vogt K, Campbell J. An opioid prescription for men undergoing minor urologic surgery is associated with an increased risk of new persistent opioid use. Eur Urol. 2020;77(1):68‐75. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.031
Barham DW, McMann LP, Musser JE, et al. Routine prescription of opioids for post‐vasectomy pain control associated with persistent use. J Urol. 2019;202(4):806‐810. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000000304
Ward B, Sellke N, Rhodes S, et al. Driving time and compliance with postvasectomy semen analysis drop‐off. Urology. 2023;84:1‐5. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2023.11.027
Bradshaw A, Ballon‐Landa E, Owusu R, Hsieh TC. Poor compliance with postvasectomy semen testing: analysis of factors and barriers. Urology. 2020;136:146‐151. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.026
Jacobsen FM, Jensen CFS, Fode M, Sønksen J, Ohl DA, CopMich Collaborative. Scheduling appointments for postvasectomy semen analysis has no impact on compliance. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2020;22:74‐78. doi:10.1016/j.euros.2020.10.006
Korthorst RA, Consten D, van Roijen JH. Clearance after vasectomy with a single semen sample containing < than 100 000 immotile sperm/mL: analysis of 1073 patients. BJU Int. 2010;105(11):1572‐1575. doi:10.1111/j.1464‐410X.2009.09074.x
Khilwani B, Badar A, Ansari AS, Lohiya NK. RISUG® as a male contraceptive: journey from bench to bedside. Basic Clin Androl. 2020;30:2. doi:10.1186/s12610‐020‐0099‐1
Sharma RS, Mathur AK, Singh R, et al. Safety & efficacy of an intravasal, one‐time injectable & non‐hormonal male contraceptive (RISUG): a clinical experience. Indian J Med Res. 2019;150(1):81‐86. doi:10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_635_18
Ansari AS, Hussain M, Khan SR, Lohiya NK. Relative suitability of DMSO and NaHCO3 for reversal of RISUG® induced long‐term contraception. Andrology. 2016;4(2):306‐313. doi:10.1111/andr.12155
Colagross‐Schouten A, Lemoy MJ, Keesler RI, Lissner E, VandeVoort CA. The contraceptive efficacy of intravas injection of Vasalgel™ for adult male rhesus monkeys. Basic Clin Androl. 2017;27:4. doi:10.1186/s12610‐017‐0048‐9
Waller D, Bolick D, Lissner E, Premanandan C, Gamerman G. Azoospermia in rabbits following an intravas injection of Vasalgel™. Basic Clin Androl. 2016;26:6. doi:10.1186/s12610‐016‐0033‐8
Contraline. Contraline achieves promising early clinical trial results for novel male contraceptive. January 4, 2024. Accessed January 29, 2024. https://www.contraline.com/news/c4OvrhbCosTzz18u299nO44#contraline‐achieves‐promising‐early
Wang ZQ, Liu ZQ, Zhao CH, et al. An ultrasound‐induced self‐clearance hydrogel for male reversible contraception. ACS Nano. 2022;16(4):5515‐5528. doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c09959
Soebadi DM, Gardjito W, Mensink HJ. Intravasal injection of formed‐in‐place medical grade silicone rubber for vas occlusion. Int J Androl. 1995;18(Suppl 1):45‐52. doi:10.1111/j.1365‐2605.1995.tb00638.x
Song L, Gu Y, Lu W, Liang X, Chen Z. A phase II randomized controlled trial of a novel male contraception, an intra‐vas device. Int J Androl. 2006;29(4):489‐495. doi:10.1111/j.1365‐2605.2006.00686.x
Lu WH, Liang XW, Gu YQ, et al. A randomized, controlled, multicenter contraceptive efficacy clinical trial of the intravas device, a nonocclusive surgical male sterilization. Asian J Androl. 2014;16(3):432‐436. doi:10.4103/1008‐682X.122860
Bimek SLV. FAQ. Accessed February 1, 2024. https://bimek.com/faq‐surgery/