Reperfusion therapies in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation: data on safety and effectiveness from a multi-centre cohort study.
atrial fibrillation
endovascular therapy
intravenous thrombolysis
ischaemic stroke
outcome
reperfusion therapies
Journal
Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
ISSN: 1590-3478
Titre abrégé: Neurol Sci
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 100959175
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 May 2024
22 May 2024
Historique:
received:
22
01
2024
accepted:
21
04
2024
medline:
22
5
2024
pubmed:
22
5
2024
entrez:
22
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular therapy (EVT) are currently considered best practices in acute stroke patients. Data regarding the efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are conflicting as regards haemorrhagic transformation, mortality, and functional outcome. This study sought to investigate for any differences, in terms of safety and effectiveness, between AF patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) treated and untreated with reperfusion therapies. Data from two multicenter cohort studies (RAF and RAF-NOACs) on consecutive patients with AF and AIS were analyzed to compare patients treated and not treated with reperfusion therapies (IVT and/or EVT). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for outcome events: 90-day good functional outcome and mortality. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis compared treated and untreated patients. Overall, 441 (25.4%) were included in the reperfusion-treated group and 1,295 (74.6%) in the untreated group. The multivariable model suggested that reperfusion therapies were significantly associated with good functional outcome. Rates of mortality and disability were higher in patients not treated, especially in the case of higher NIHSS scores. In the PSM comparison, 173/250 patients (69.2%) who had received reperfusion therapies had good functional outcome at 90 days, compared to 146/250 (58.4%) untreated patients (p = 0.009, OR: 1.60, 95% CI:1.11-2.31). Patients with AF and AIS treated with reperfusion therapies had a significantly higher rate of good functional outcome and lower rates of mortality compared to those patients with AF and AIS who had undergone conservative treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular therapy (EVT) are currently considered best practices in acute stroke patients. Data regarding the efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are conflicting as regards haemorrhagic transformation, mortality, and functional outcome. This study sought to investigate for any differences, in terms of safety and effectiveness, between AF patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) treated and untreated with reperfusion therapies.
METHODS
METHODS
Data from two multicenter cohort studies (RAF and RAF-NOACs) on consecutive patients with AF and AIS were analyzed to compare patients treated and not treated with reperfusion therapies (IVT and/or EVT). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for outcome events: 90-day good functional outcome and mortality. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis compared treated and untreated patients.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 441 (25.4%) were included in the reperfusion-treated group and 1,295 (74.6%) in the untreated group. The multivariable model suggested that reperfusion therapies were significantly associated with good functional outcome. Rates of mortality and disability were higher in patients not treated, especially in the case of higher NIHSS scores. In the PSM comparison, 173/250 patients (69.2%) who had received reperfusion therapies had good functional outcome at 90 days, compared to 146/250 (58.4%) untreated patients (p = 0.009, OR: 1.60, 95% CI:1.11-2.31).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with AF and AIS treated with reperfusion therapies had a significantly higher rate of good functional outcome and lower rates of mortality compared to those patients with AF and AIS who had undergone conservative treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38775860
doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07555-z
pii: 10.1007/s10072-024-07555-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Go AS et al (2014) Heart disease and stroke statistics−2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 129:e28–e292
doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80
pubmed: 24352519
Chugh SS et al (2014) Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a global burden of disease 2010 study. Circulation 129:837–847
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119
pubmed: 24345399
Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB (1991) Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke 22:983–988
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.22.8.983
pubmed: 1866765
Tu HTH et al (2010) Pathophysiological determinants of worse stroke outcome in atrial fibrillation. Cerebrovasc Dis 30:389–395
doi: 10.1159/000316886
pubmed: 20693794
Tu HTH et al (2015) Worse stroke outcome in atrial fibrillation is explained by more severe hypoperfusion, infarct growth, and hemorrhagic transformation. Int J Stroke 10:534–540
doi: 10.1111/ijs.12007
pubmed: 23489996
Elsheikh S, Hill A, Irving G, Lip GYH, Abdul-Rahim AH (2024) Atrial fibrillation and stroke: state-of-the-art and future directions. Curr Probl Cardiol 49(1 Pt C):102181
Polymeris AA et al (2022) Aetiology, secondary prevention strategies and outcomes of ischaemic stroke despite oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 93(6):588–598
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328391
pubmed: 35396339
Kimura K, Minemaisu K, Yamaguchi T (2005) Atrial fibrillation as a predictive factor for severe stroke and early death in 15 831 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:679–683
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.048827
pubmed: 15834026
pmcid: 1739612
Emberson J et al (2014) Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 384(9958):1929–1935
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60584-5
pubmed: 25106063
pmcid: 4441266
Bush CK et al (2016) Endovascular treatment with stent-retriever devices for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 11(1):e0147287
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147287
pubmed: 26807742
pmcid: 4726653
Berge E et al (2021) European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Stroke J 6:I–LXII
doi: 10.1177/2396987321989865
pubmed: 33817340
pmcid: 7995316
Turc G et al (2023) European Stroke Organisation (ESO) - European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) Guidelines on Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 15(8):e8
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014569
pubmed: 30808653
Hu Y, Ji C (2021) Efficacy and safety of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. BMC Neurol 21(1):66
doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02095-x
pubmed: 33573619
pmcid: 7877096
Kimura K et al (2008) Atrial fibrillation as an independent predictor for no early recanalization after IV-t-PA in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurol Sci 267:57–61
doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.09.036
pubmed: 17964602
Padjen V et al (2014) Effect of intravenous thrombolysis on stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 23:2199–2205
doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.04.035
pubmed: 25018112
Kobeissi H et al (2023) Outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation following thrombectomy for stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 6(1):e2249993
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49993
pubmed: 36607633
pmcid: 9857225
Wu W et al (2023) Effect of atrial fibrillation on outcomes in patients with anterior circulation occlusion stroke receiving endovascular therapy. Front Aging Neurosci 15:1160265
doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1160265
pubmed: 37396665
pmcid: 10311510
Paciaroni M et al (2015) Early recurrence and cerebral bleeding in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation effect of anticoagulation and its timing: the RAF study. Stroke 46(8):2175–2182
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008891
pubmed: 26130094
Paciaroni M et al (2017) Early recurrence and major bleeding in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation treated with Non-Vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (RAF-NOACs) Study. J Am Heart Assoc 6(12):e007034
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007034
pubmed: 29220330
pmcid: 5779022
Zhang JB et al (2010) Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation. Neurol Res 32:353–358
doi: 10.1179/016164110X12656393665206
pubmed: 20483000