Feasibility of perforator flaps in Day surgery. A retrospective study through a two-years' experience.

Ambulatory care Chirurgie ambulatoire Day surgery Lambeaux perforants Oncologie chirurgicale Perforator flaps Reconstruction Surgical oncology

Journal

Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique
ISSN: 1768-319X
Titre abrégé: Ann Chir Plast Esthet
Pays: France
ID NLM: 8305839

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 May 2024
Historique:
received: 08 11 2023
revised: 05 04 2024
accepted: 05 04 2024
medline: 23 5 2024
pubmed: 23 5 2024
entrez: 22 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Day surgery is developing and its popularity is increasing for a variety of reasons: economic constraints, changes in professional practices, a greater adhesion of the patient. In an era of progress in surgical procedures, pedicled-perforator flaps reducing donor site morbidity and avoiding micro-anastomosis could take their place in Day surgery if planned and managed by an experienced team. In the period January 2019 to January 2021, we performed perforator flaps for soft tissue coverage in ambulatory setting. The patients were included retrospectively and data were collected by reviewing the medical records. Major and minor complications were recorded. The retrospective cohort included 32 surgical procedures in 32 patients. In all cases, perforator flaps were realized for resurfacing soft tissue defects consequent to oncodermatology surgery (84.3%), soft tissue sarcoma surgery (12.5%), invasive ductal breast carcinoma (3.1%). Major complications needing a surgical revision overcame 3/32 times (9.4%). In these cases, a failure requiring the drop off the flap overcame once. The average wound healing time was of 33 days (15-90) and the mean duration of follow-up was 9.6 months (1-22). The low complication rate in our series suggests that this first experience on perforator flaps in outpatient surgery is promising in terms of safety and feasibility. Day surgery could be a practical option for this type of surgical procedures avoiding the conventional department's saturation and allowing the delivery of proper surgical cares.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Day surgery is developing and its popularity is increasing for a variety of reasons: economic constraints, changes in professional practices, a greater adhesion of the patient. In an era of progress in surgical procedures, pedicled-perforator flaps reducing donor site morbidity and avoiding micro-anastomosis could take their place in Day surgery if planned and managed by an experienced team.
METHODS METHODS
In the period January 2019 to January 2021, we performed perforator flaps for soft tissue coverage in ambulatory setting. The patients were included retrospectively and data were collected by reviewing the medical records. Major and minor complications were recorded.
RESULTS RESULTS
The retrospective cohort included 32 surgical procedures in 32 patients. In all cases, perforator flaps were realized for resurfacing soft tissue defects consequent to oncodermatology surgery (84.3%), soft tissue sarcoma surgery (12.5%), invasive ductal breast carcinoma (3.1%). Major complications needing a surgical revision overcame 3/32 times (9.4%). In these cases, a failure requiring the drop off the flap overcame once. The average wound healing time was of 33 days (15-90) and the mean duration of follow-up was 9.6 months (1-22).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The low complication rate in our series suggests that this first experience on perforator flaps in outpatient surgery is promising in terms of safety and feasibility. Day surgery could be a practical option for this type of surgical procedures avoiding the conventional department's saturation and allowing the delivery of proper surgical cares.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38777637
pii: S0294-1260(24)00051-7
doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2024.04.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

S Gandolfi (S)

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Rangueil University Hospital Center of Toulouse, 1, avenue du Professeur-Jean-Poulhès, 31400 Toulouse, France. Electronic address: silvia.gan@hotmail.com.

E Lupon (E)

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Rangueil University Hospital Center of Toulouse, 1, avenue du Professeur-Jean-Poulhès, 31400 Toulouse, France.

C Berthier (C)

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Cancer University Institute of Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Hubert-Curien, 31100 Toulouse, France.

D Gangloff (D)

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Rangueil University Hospital Center of Toulouse, 1, avenue du Professeur-Jean-Poulhès, 31400 Toulouse, France; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Cancer University Institute of Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Hubert-Curien, 31100 Toulouse, France.

K Kolsi (K)

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Cancer University Institute of Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Hubert-Curien, 31100 Toulouse, France.

T Meresse (T)

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Rangueil University Hospital Center of Toulouse, 1, avenue du Professeur-Jean-Poulhès, 31400 Toulouse, France; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Cancer University Institute of Toulouse Oncopole, 1, avenue Hubert-Curien, 31100 Toulouse, France.

Classifications MeSH