Natural proteome diversity links aneuploidy tolerance to protein turnover.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 May 2024
22 May 2024
Historique:
received:
07
04
2022
accepted:
19
04
2024
medline:
23
5
2024
pubmed:
23
5
2024
entrez:
22
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Accessing the natural genetic diversity of species unveils hidden genetic traits, clarifies gene functions and allows the generalizability of laboratory findings to be assessed. One notable discovery made in natural isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is that aneuploidy-an imbalance in chromosome copy numbers-is frequent
Identifiants
pubmed: 38778096
doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07442-9
pii: 10.1038/s41586-024-07442-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Peter, J. et al. Genome evolution across 1,011 Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates. Nature 556, 339–344 (2018).
pubmed: 29643504
pmcid: 6784862
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0030-5
Gallone, B. et al. Domestication and divergence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae beer yeasts. Cell 166, 1397–1410 (2016).
pubmed: 27610566
pmcid: 5018251
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.020
Torres, E. M. et al. Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 317, 916–924 (2007).
pubmed: 17702937
doi: 10.1126/science.1142210
Hose, J. et al. Dosage compensation can buffer copy-number variation in wild yeast. eLife 4, e05462 (2015).
pubmed: 25955966
pmcid: 4448642
doi: 10.7554/eLife.05462
Pavelka, N. et al. Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast. Nature 468, 321–325 (2010).
pubmed: 20962780
pmcid: 2978756
doi: 10.1038/nature09529
Caudal, E. et al. Pan-transcriptome reveals a large accessory genome contribution to gene expression variation in yeast. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.17.541122 (2023).
Legras, J.-L. et al. Adaptation of S. cerevisiae to fermented food environments reveals remarkable genome plasticity and the footprints of domestication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1712–1727 (2018).
pubmed: 29746697
pmcid: 5995190
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy066
Bergström, A. et al. A high-definition view of functional genetic variation from natural yeast genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 872–888 (2014).
pubmed: 24425782
pmcid: 3969562
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu037
Zhu, Y. O., Sherlock, G. & Petrov, D. A. Whole genome analysis of 132 clinical Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains reveals extensive ploidy variation. G3 6, 2421–2434 (2016).
pubmed: 27317778
pmcid: 4978896
doi: 10.1534/g3.116.029397
Dephoure, N. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals posttranslational responses to aneuploidy in yeast. eLife 3, e03023 (2014).
pubmed: 25073701
pmcid: 4129440
doi: 10.7554/eLife.03023
Selmecki, A., Forche, A. & Berman, J. Aneuploidy and isochromosome formation in drug-resistant Candida albicans. Science 313, 367–370 (2006).
pubmed: 16857942
pmcid: 1717021
doi: 10.1126/science.1128242
Yona, A. H. et al. Chromosomal duplication is a transient evolutionary solution to stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 21010–21015 (2012).
pubmed: 23197825
pmcid: 3529009
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211150109
Yang, F. et al. Adaptation to fluconazole via aneuploidy enables cross-adaptation to amphotericin B and flucytosine in Cryptococcus neoformans. Microbiol. Spectr. 9, e0072321 (2021).
pubmed: 34585947
doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00723-21
Beaupere, C. et al. Genetic screen identifies adaptive aneuploidy as a key mediator of ER stress resistance in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9586–9591 (2018).
pubmed: 30185560
pmcid: 6156608
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804264115
Anderson, M. Z., Saha, A., Haseeb, A. & Bennett, R. J. A chromosome 4 trisomy contributes to increased fluconazole resistance in a clinical isolate of Candida albicans. Microbiology 163, 856–865 (2017).
pubmed: 28640746
pmcid: 5737213
doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000478
Berman, J. & Krysan, D. J. Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 319–331 (2020).
pubmed: 32047294
pmcid: 7231573
doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0322-2
Zhu, J., Tsai, H.-J., Gordon, M. R. & Li, R. Cellular stress associated with aneuploidy. Dev. Cell 44, 420–431 (2018).
pubmed: 29486194
pmcid: 6529225
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.02.002
Gordon, D. J., Resio, B. & Pellman, D. Causes and consequences of aneuploidy in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 189–203 (2012).
pubmed: 22269907
doi: 10.1038/nrg3123
Ben-David, U. & Amon, A. Context is everything: aneuploidy in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 44–62 (2020).
pubmed: 31548659
doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0171-x
Taylor, A. M. et al. Genomic and functional approaches to understanding cancer aneuploidy. Cancer Cell 33, 676–689 (2018).
pubmed: 29622463
pmcid: 6028190
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.007
Chunduri, N. K. & Storchová, Z. The diverse consequences of aneuploidy. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 54–62 (2019).
pubmed: 30602769
doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0243-8
Holland, A. J. & Cleveland, D. W. Boveri revisited: chromosomal instability, aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 478–487 (2009).
pubmed: 19546858
pmcid: 3154738
doi: 10.1038/nrm2718
Brennan, C. M. et al. Protein aggregation mediates stoichiometry of protein complexes in aneuploid cells. Genes Dev. 33, 1031–1047 (2019).
pubmed: 31196865
pmcid: 6672052
doi: 10.1101/gad.327494.119
Stingele, S. et al. Global analysis of genome, transcriptome and proteome reveals the response to aneuploidy in human cells. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8, 608 (2012).
pubmed: 22968442
pmcid: 3472693
doi: 10.1038/msb.2012.40
McShane, E. et al. Kinetic analysis of protein stability reveals age-dependent degradation. Cell 167, 803–815 (2016).
pubmed: 27720452
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.015
Schukken, K. M. & Sheltzer, J. M. Extensive protein dosage compensation in aneuploid human cancers. Genome Res. 32, 1254–1270 (2022).
pubmed: 35701073
pmcid: 9341510
doi: 10.1101/gr.276378.121
Chunduri, N. K. et al. Systems approaches identify the consequences of monosomy in somatic human cells. Nat. Commun. 12, 5576 (2021).
pubmed: 34552071
pmcid: 8458293
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25288-x
Cuypers, B. et al. Four layer multi-omics reveals molecular responses to aneuploidy in Leishmania. PLoS Pathog. 18, e1010848 (2022).
pubmed: 36149920
pmcid: 9534393
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010848
Senger, G., Santaguida, S. & Schaefer, M. H. Regulation of protein complex partners as a compensatory mechanism in aneuploid tumors. eLife 11, e75526 (2022).
pubmed: 35575458
pmcid: 9135399
doi: 10.7554/eLife.75526
Ippolito, M. R. et al. Increased RNA and protein degradation is required for counteracting transcriptional burden and proteotoxic stress in human aneuploid cells. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.27.525826 (2023).
Liu, Y. et al. Systematic proteome and proteostasis profiling in human trisomy 21 fibroblast cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 1212 (2017).
pubmed: 29089484
pmcid: 5663699
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01422-6
Berman, J. Evolutionary genomics: when abnormality is beneficial. Nature 468, 183–184 (2010).
pubmed: 21068824
doi: 10.1038/468183a
Hose, J. et al. The genetic basis of aneuploidy tolerance in wild yeast. eLife 9, e52063 (2020).
pubmed: 31909711
pmcid: 6970514
doi: 10.7554/eLife.52063
Tsai, H. J. et al. Hypo-osmotic-like stress underlies general cellular defects of aneuploidy. Nature 570, 117–121 (2019).
pubmed: 31068692
pmcid: 6583789
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1187-2
Terhorst, A. et al. The environmental stress response causes ribosome loss in aneuploid yeast cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 17031–17040 (2020).
pubmed: 32632008
pmcid: 7382292
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2005648117
Scopel, E. F. C., Hose, J., Bensasson, D. & Gasch, A. P. Genetic variation in aneuploidy prevalence and tolerance across Saccharomyces cerevisiae lineages. Genetics 217, iyab015 (2021).
pubmed: 33734361
pmcid: 8049548
doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab015
Gasch, A. P. et al. Further support for aneuploidy tolerance in wild yeast and effects of dosage compensation on gene copy-number evolution. eLife 5, e14409 (2016).
pubmed: 26949252
pmcid: 4798956
doi: 10.7554/eLife.14409
Torres, E. M., Springer, M. & Amon, A. No current evidence for widespread dosage compensation in S. cerevisiae. eLife 5, e10996 (2016).
pubmed: 26949255
pmcid: 4798953
doi: 10.7554/eLife.10996
Steger, M. et al. Time-resolved in vivo ubiquitinome profiling by DIA-MS reveals USP7 targets on a proteome-wide scale. Nat. Commun. 12, 5399 (2021).
pubmed: 34518535
pmcid: 8438043
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25454-1
Schwanhäusser, B. et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473, 337–342 (2011).
pubmed: 21593866
doi: 10.1038/nature10098
Messner, C. B. et al. Ultra-fast proteomics with Scanning SWATH. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 846–854 (2021).
pubmed: 33767396
pmcid: 7611254
doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00860-4
Demichev, V., Messner, C. B., Vernardis, S. I., Lilley, K. S. & Ralser, M. DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput. Nat. Methods 17, 41–44 (2020).
pubmed: 31768060
doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0638-x
Larrimore, K. E., Barattin-Voynova, N. S., Reid, D. W. & Ng, D. T. W. Aneuploidy-induced proteotoxic stress can be effectively tolerated without dosage compensation, genetic mutations, or stress responses. BMC Biol. 18, 117 (2020).
pubmed: 32900371
pmcid: 7487686
doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00852-x
Gasch, A. P. et al. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 4241–4257 (2000).
pubmed: 11102521
pmcid: 15070
doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.12.4241
Messner, C. B. et al. The proteomic landscape of genome-wide genetic perturbations. Cell 186, 2018–2034 (2023).
pubmed: 37080200
pmcid: 7615649
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.026
Martin-Perez, M. & Villén, J. Determinants and regulation of protein turnover in yeast. Cell Syst. 5, 283–294 (2017).
pubmed: 28918244
pmcid: 5935796
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.08.008
Olin-Sandoval, V. et al. Lysine harvesting is an antioxidant strategy and triggers underground polyamine metabolism. Nature 572, 249–253 (2019).
pubmed: 31367038
pmcid: 6774798
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1442-6
Gasch, A. P., Payseur, B. A. & Pool, J. E. The power of natural variation for model organism biology. Trends Genet. 32, 147–154 (2016).
pubmed: 26777596
pmcid: 4769656
doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2015.12.003
She, R. & Jarosz, D. F. Mapping causal variants with single-nucleotide resolution reveals biochemical drivers of phenotypic change. Cell 172, 478–490 (2018).
pubmed: 29373829
pmcid: 5788306
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.015
McQueary, H. C. et al. No evidence for whole-chromosome dosage compensation or global transcriptomic expression differences in spontaneously-aneuploid mutation accumulation lines of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.01.404830 (2020).
Donnelly, N., Passerini, V., Dürrbaum, M., Stingele, S. & Storchová, Z. HSF1 deficiency and impaired HSP 90‐dependent protein folding are hallmarks of aneuploid human cells. EMBO J. 33, 2374–2387 (2014).
pubmed: 25205676
pmcid: 4253526
doi: 10.15252/embj.201488648
Oromendia, A. B., Dodgson, S. E. & Amon, A. Aneuploidy causes proteotoxic stress in yeast. Genes Dev. 26, 2696–2708 (2012).
pubmed: 23222101
pmcid: 3533075
doi: 10.1101/gad.207407.112
Torres, E. M. et al. Identification of aneuploidy-tolerating mutations. Cell 143, 71–83 (2010).
pubmed: 20850176
pmcid: 2993244
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.038
Drysdale, J. W. & Munro, H. N. Regulation of synthesis and turnover of ferritin in rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 241, 3630–3637 (1966).
pubmed: 5919688
doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)99877-7
Kustatscher, G., Grabowski, P. & Rappsilber, J. Pervasive coexpression of spatially proximal genes is buffered at the protein level. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 937 (2017).
pubmed: 28835372
pmcid: 5572396
doi: 10.15252/msb.20177548
Marsit, S. & Dequin, S. Diversity and adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces wine yeast: a review. FEMS Yeast Res. 15, fov067 (2015).
pubmed: 26205244
pmcid: 4629790
doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fov067
Robinson, M. D. & Oshlack, A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 11, R25 (2010).
pubmed: 20196867
pmcid: 2864565
doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).
pubmed: 19910308
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616
McCarthy, D. J., Chen, Y. & Smyth, G. K. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 4288–4297 (2012).
pubmed: 22287627
pmcid: 3378882
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks042
Edgar, R., Domrachev, M. & Lash, A. E. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 207–210 (2002).
pubmed: 11752295
pmcid: 99122
doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.207
Messner, C. B. et al. Ultra-high-throughput clinical proteomics reveals classifiers of COVID-19 infection. Cell Syst. 11, 11–24 (2020).
pubmed: 32619549
pmcid: 7264033
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.05.012
Vowinckel, J. et al. Cost-effective generation of precise label-free quantitative proteomes in high-throughput by microLC and data-independent acquisition. Sci. Rep. 8, 4346 (2018).
pubmed: 29531254
pmcid: 5847575
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22610-4
UniProt Consortium. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D480–D489 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100
Cox, J. et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 2513–2526 (2014).
pubmed: 24942700
pmcid: 4159666
doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.031591
Troyanskaya, O. et al. Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics 17, 520–525 (2001).
pubmed: 11395428
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.6.520
Rappsilber, J., Ishihama, Y. & Mann, M. Stop and go extraction tips for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, nanoelectrospray, and LC/MS sample pretreatment in proteomics. Anal. Chem. 75, 663–670 (2003).
pubmed: 12585499
doi: 10.1021/ac026117i
Mülleder, M., Campbell, K., Matsarskaia, O., Eckerstorfer, F. & Ralser, M. Saccharomyces cerevisiae single-copy plasmids for auxotrophy compensation, multiple marker selection, and for designing metabolically cooperating communities. F1000Res. 5, 2351 (2016).
pubmed: 27830062
pmcid: 5081161
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9606.1
Mülleder, M. et al. Functional metabolomics describes the yeast biosynthetic regulome. Cell 167, 553–565 (2016).
pubmed: 27693354
pmcid: 5055083
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.007
Kanehisa, M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 28, 1947–1951 (2019).
pubmed: 31441146
pmcid: 6798127
doi: 10.1002/pro.3715
Carlson, M. org.Sc.sgd.db: Genome wide annotation for yeast. R v.2 (Bioconductor, 2014).
Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32, 2847–2849 (2016).
pubmed: 27207943
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313
Yahya, G. et al. Sublinear scaling of the cellular proteome with ploidy. Nat. Commun. 13, 6182 (2022).
pubmed: 36261409
pmcid: 9581932
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33904-7
Meldal, B. H. M. et al. Complex Portal 2018: extended content and enhanced visualization tools for macromolecular complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D550–D558 (2019).
pubmed: 30357405
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1001
Szklarczyk, D. et al. STRING v10: protein–protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D447–D452 (2015).
pubmed: 25352553
doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1003
Piovesan, D. et al. MobiDB: 10 years of intrinsically disordered proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D438–D444 (2023).
pubmed: 36416266
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1065
Steenwyk, J. L. et al. BioKIT: a versatile toolkit for processing and analyzing diverse types of sequence data. Genetics 221, iyac079 (2022).
pubmed: 35536198
pmcid: 9252278
doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyac079
McManus, C. J., May, G. E., Spealman, P. & Shteyman, A. Ribosome profiling reveals post-transcriptional buffering of divergent gene expression in yeast. Genome Res. 24, 422–430 (2014).
pubmed: 24318730
pmcid: 3941107
doi: 10.1101/gr.164996.113
Chen, Y. & Nielsen, J. Yeast has evolved to minimize protein resource cost for synthesizing amino acids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2114622119 (2022).
pubmed: 35042799
pmcid: 8795554
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114622119
Ghaemmaghami, S. et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737–741 (2003).
pubmed: 14562106
doi: 10.1038/nature02046
Robin, X. et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 77 (2011).
pubmed: 21414208
pmcid: 3068975
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77
Cherry, J. M. et al. Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D700–5 (2012).
pubmed: 22110037
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1029
Liao, Y., Wang, J., Jaehnig, E. J., Shi, Z. & Zhang, B. WebGestalt 2019: gene set analysis toolkit with revamped UIs and APIs. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W199–W205 (2019).
pubmed: 31114916
pmcid: 6602449
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz401
Kassambara, A. rstatix: Pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests. R v.0.6.0 (CRAN, 2020).
Finley, D., Ulrich, H. D., Sommer, T. & Kaiser, P. The ubiquitin–proteasome system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 192, 319–360 (2012).
pubmed: 23028185
pmcid: 3454868
doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.140467