Three-dimensional EPI with shot-selective CAIPIRIHANA for rapid high-resolution quantitative susceptibility mapping at 3 T.
3D EPI
CAIPIRINHA
QSM
high resolution
Journal
Magnetic resonance in medicine
ISSN: 1522-2594
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8505245
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 May 2024
22 May 2024
Historique:
revised:
14
03
2024
received:
03
10
2023
accepted:
16
03
2024
medline:
23
5
2024
pubmed:
23
5
2024
entrez:
23
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
QSM provides insight into healthy brain aging and neuropathologies such as multiple sclerosis (MS), traumatic brain injuries, brain tumors, and neurodegenerative diseases. Phase data for QSM are usually acquired from 3D gradient-echo (3D GRE) scans with long acquisition times that are detrimental to patient comfort and susceptible to patient motion. This is particularly true for scans requiring whole-brain coverage and submillimeter resolutions. In this work, we use a multishot 3D echo plannar imaging (3D EPI) sequence with shot-selective 2D CAIPIRIHANA to acquire high-resolution, whole-brain data for QSM with minimal distortion and blurring. To test clinical viability, the 3D EPI sequence was used to image a cohort of MS patients at 1-mm isotropic resolution at 3 T. Additionally, 3D EPI data of healthy subjects were acquired at 1-mm, 0.78-mm, and 0.65-mm isotropic resolution with varying echo train lengths (ETLs) and compared with a reference 3D GRE acquisition. The appearance of the susceptibility maps and the susceptibility values for segmented regions of interest were comparable between 3D EPI and 3D GRE acquisitions for both healthy and MS participants. Additionally, all lesions visible in the MS patients on the 3D GRE susceptibility maps were also visible on the 3D EPI susceptibility maps. The interplay among acquisition time, resolution, echo train length, and the effect of distortion on the calculated susceptibility maps was investigated. We demonstrate that the 3D EPI sequence is capable of rapidly acquiring submillimeter resolutions and providing high-quality, clinically relevant susceptibility maps.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Austrian Science Fund
ID : 31452
Organisme : Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs
Organisme : HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
ID : MS-fMRI-QSM 794298
Organisme : Österreichische Nationalstiftung für Forschung, Technologie und Entwicklung
Organisme : Australian Research Council
ID : IC170100035
Organisme : Australian Research Council
ID : LP200301393
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Références
Tolaymat B, Zheng W, Chen H, Choi S, Li X, Harrison D. Sex‐specific differences in rim appearance of multiple sclerosis lesions on quantitative susceptibility mapping. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;45:102317. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2020.102317
Vernooij MW, et al. Cerebral microbleeds: accelerated 3D T2*‐weighted GRE MR imaging versus conventional 2D T2*‐weighted GRE MR imaging for detection. Radiology 2008;248:272‐277. doi:10.1148/radiol.2481071158
Yu K, Ren Z, Li J, Guo S, Hu Y, Li Y. Direct visualization of deep brain stimulation targets in patients with Parkinson's disease via 3‐T quantitative susceptibility mapping. Acta Neurochir. 2021;163:1335‐1345. doi:10.1007/S00701‐021‐04715‐4/FIGURES/5
Dimov AV, Gupta A, Kopell BH, Wang Y. High‐resolution QSM for functional and structural depiction of subthalamic nuclei in DBS presurgical mapping. J Neurosurg. 2019;131:360‐367. doi:10.3171/2018.3.JNS172145
Wen J, Cross AH, Yablonskiy DA. On the role of physiological fluctuations in quantitative gradient echo MRI: implications for GEPCI, QSM, and SWI. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73:195‐203. doi:10.1002/mrm.25114
Pardoe HR, Kucharsky Hiess R, Kuzniecky R. Motion and morphometry in clinical and nonclinical populations. Neuroimage. 2016;135:177‐185. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.005
Sun H, Wilman AH. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using single‐shot echo‐planar imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73:1932‐1938. doi:10.1002/mrm.25316
Langkammer C, Bredies K, Poser BA, et al. Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping using 3D EPI and total generalized variation. Neuroimage. 2015;111:622‐630. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.041
Wicaksono KP, Fushimi Y, Nakajima S, et al. Two‐minute quantitative susceptibility mapping from three‐dimensional echo‐planar imaging: accuracy, reliability, and detection performance in patients with cerebral microbleeds. Invest Radiol. 2021;56:69‐77. doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000708
Stäb D, Bollmann S, Langkammer C, Bredies K, Barth M. Accelerated mapping of magnetic susceptibility using 3D planes‐on‐a‐paddlewheel (POP) EPI at ultra‐high field strength. NMR Biomed. 2017;30:e3620. doi:10.1002/nbm.3620
Hendriks AD, D'Agata F, et al. Pushing functional MRI spatial and temporal resolution further: high‐density receive arrays combined with shot‐selective 2D CAIPIRINHA for 3D echo‐planar imaging at 7 T. NMR Biomed. 2020;33:e4281. doi:10.1002/nbm.4281
Chen Z, Liao C, Cao X, et al. 3D‐EPI blip‐up/down acquisition (BUDA) with CAIPI and joint Hankel structured low‐rank reconstruction for rapid distortion‐free high‐resolution T2* mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2023;89:1961‐1974. doi:10.1002/mrm.29578
Stirnberg R, Stöcker T. Segmented k‐space blipped‐controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for high spatiotemporal resolution EPI. Magn Reson Med. 2021;85:1540‐1551. doi:10.1002/mrm.28486
Wang D, Ehses P, Stöcker T, Stirnberg R. Reproducibility of rapid multi‐parameter mapping at 3T and 7T with highly segmented and accelerated 3D‐EPI. Magn Reson Med. 2022;88:2217‐2232. doi:10.1002/mrm.29383
Stirnberg R, Deistung A, Stöcker T. T*‐weighted dual‐polarity skipped‐CAIPI 3D‐EPI: 400 microns isotropic whole‐brain QSM at 7 tesla in 6 minutes. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of ISMRM [Virtual], 2022. p. 5094.
Sati P, Thomasson DM, Li N, et al. Rapid, high‐resolution, whole‐brain, susceptibility‐based MRI of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2014;20:1464‐1470. doi:10.1177/1352458514525868
Li X, Harrison DM, Liu H, et al. Magnetic susceptibility contrast variations in multiple sclerosis lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;43:463‐473. doi:10.1002/jmri.24976
Breuer FA, Blaimer M, Mueller MF, et al. Controlled aliasing in volumetric parallel imaging (2D CAIPIRINHA). Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:549‐556. doi:10.1002/mrm.20787
Griswold MA, Jakob PM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:1202‐1210. doi:10.1002/mrm.10171
Bachrata B, Bollmann S, Jin J, et al. Super‐resolution QSM in little or no additional time for imaging (NATIve) using 2D EPI imaging in 3 orthogonal planes. Neuroimage. 2023;283:120419. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120419
Jellus V, Kannengiesser S. Adaptive coil combination using a body coil scan as phase reference. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the ISMRM, Milan, Italy, 2014. p. 4406.
Eckstein K, Dymerska B, Bachrata B, et al. Computationally efficient combination of multi‐channel phase data from multi‐echo acquisitions (ASPIRE). Magn Reson Med. 2018;79:2996‐3006. doi:10.1002/mrm.26963
Eckstein K, Trattnig S, Robinson SD. A simple homogeneity correction for neuroimaging at 7T. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Montréal, Canada, 2019. Abstract 2716
Jell V, Kannengiesser SA. Adaptive coil combination using a body coil scan as phase reference. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of ISMRM. Milan, Italy, 2014. Abstract 4406
Stewart AW, Robinson SD, O'Brien K, et al. QSMxT: robust masking and artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2022;87:1289‐1300. doi:10.1002/mrm.29048
Liu T, Khalidov I, de Rochefort L, et al. A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF). NMR Biomed. 2011;24:1129‐1136. doi:10.1002/nbm.1670
Kames C, Wiggermann V, Rauscher A. Rapid two‐step dipole inversion for susceptibility mapping with sparsity priors. Neuroimage. 2018;167:276‐283. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.018
Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Stauffer M, Song G, Wu B, Gee JC. The insight ToolKit image registration framework. Front Neuroinform. 2014;8:44. doi:10.3389/FNINF.2014.00044/BIBTEX
Henschel L, Conjeti S, Estrada S, Diers K, Fischl B, Reuter M. FastSurfer—a fast and accurate deep learning based neuroimaging pipeline. Neuroimage. 2020;219:117012. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117012
Li W, Wu B, Liu C. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. Neuroimage. 2011;55:1645‐1656. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.088
Chen W, Gauthier SA, Gupta A, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of multiple sclerosis lesions at various ages. Radiology. 2014;271:183‐192. doi:10.1148/radiol.13130353
Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;155:143‐155. doi:10.1002/hbm.10062
Feinberg DA, Oshio K. Phase errors in multi‐shot echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1994;32:535‐539. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910320418
Calabrese M, Filippi M, Gallo P. Cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:438‐444. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.93
Schallmo MP, Weldon KB, Burton PC, Sponheim SR, Olman CA. Assessing methods for geometric distortion compensation in 7 T gradient echo functional MRI data. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021;42:4205‐4223. doi:10.1002/hbm.25540