Neonatal morbidity and mortality in birth centers in the United States 2018-2021: An observational study of low-risk birthing individuals.

Apgar scores birth centers birth locations hospital births neonatal deaths neonatal seizures

Journal

Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)
ISSN: 1523-536X
Titre abrégé: Birth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8302042

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 May 2024
Historique:
revised: 26 11 2023
received: 19 07 2023
accepted: 12 04 2024
medline: 23 5 2024
pubmed: 23 5 2024
entrez: 23 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Many studies reporting neonatal outcomes in birth centers include births with risk factors not acceptable for birth center care using the evidence-based CABC criteria. Accurate comparisons of outcomes by birth setting for low-risk patients are needed. Data from the public Natality Detailed File from 2018 to 2021 were used. Logistic regression, including adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios, compared neonatal outcomes (chorioamnionitis, Apgar scores, resuscitation, intensive care, seizures, and death) between centers and hospitals. Covariates included maternal diabetes, body mass index, age, parity, and demographic characteristics. The sample included 8,738,711 births (8,698,432 (99.53%) in hospitals and 40,279 (0.46%) in birth centers). There were no significant differences in neonatal deaths (aOR 1.037; 95% CI [0.515, 2.088]; p-value 0.918) or seizures (aOR 0.666; 95% CI [0.315, 1.411]; p-value 0.289). Measures of morbidity either not significantly different or less likely to occur in birth centers compared to hospitals included chorioamnionitis (aOR 0.032; 95% CI [0.020, 0.052]; p-value < 0.001), Apgar score < 4 (aOR 0.814, 95% CI [0.638, 1.039], p-value 0.099), Apgar score < 7 (aOR 1.075, 95% CI [0.979, 1.180], p-value 0.130), ventilation >6 h (aOR 0.349; [0.281,0.433], p-value < 0.001), and intensive care admission (aOR 0.356; 95% CI [0.328, 0.386], p-value < 0.001). Birth centers had higher odds of assisted neonatal ventilation for <6 h as compared to hospitals (aOR 1.373; 95% CI [1.293, 1.457], p-value < 0.001). Neonatal deaths and seizures were not significantly different between freestanding birth centers and hospitals. Chorioamnionitis, Apgar scores < 4, and intensive care admission were less likely to occur in birth centers.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Many studies reporting neonatal outcomes in birth centers include births with risk factors not acceptable for birth center care using the evidence-based CABC criteria. Accurate comparisons of outcomes by birth setting for low-risk patients are needed.
METHODS METHODS
Data from the public Natality Detailed File from 2018 to 2021 were used. Logistic regression, including adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios, compared neonatal outcomes (chorioamnionitis, Apgar scores, resuscitation, intensive care, seizures, and death) between centers and hospitals. Covariates included maternal diabetes, body mass index, age, parity, and demographic characteristics.
RESULTS RESULTS
The sample included 8,738,711 births (8,698,432 (99.53%) in hospitals and 40,279 (0.46%) in birth centers). There were no significant differences in neonatal deaths (aOR 1.037; 95% CI [0.515, 2.088]; p-value 0.918) or seizures (aOR 0.666; 95% CI [0.315, 1.411]; p-value 0.289). Measures of morbidity either not significantly different or less likely to occur in birth centers compared to hospitals included chorioamnionitis (aOR 0.032; 95% CI [0.020, 0.052]; p-value < 0.001), Apgar score < 4 (aOR 0.814, 95% CI [0.638, 1.039], p-value 0.099), Apgar score < 7 (aOR 1.075, 95% CI [0.979, 1.180], p-value 0.130), ventilation >6 h (aOR 0.349; [0.281,0.433], p-value < 0.001), and intensive care admission (aOR 0.356; 95% CI [0.328, 0.386], p-value < 0.001). Birth centers had higher odds of assisted neonatal ventilation for <6 h as compared to hospitals (aOR 1.373; 95% CI [1.293, 1.457], p-value < 0.001).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Neonatal deaths and seizures were not significantly different between freestanding birth centers and hospitals. Chorioamnionitis, Apgar scores < 4, and intensive care admission were less likely to occur in birth centers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38778783
doi: 10.1111/birt.12823
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. Birth published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Osterman MJKHB, Martin JA, Driscoll AKVC. Births: final data for 2021. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2023;72(1):1‐53.
National Academies of Sciences Engineering & Medicine. Birth settings in America: outcomes, quality, access, and choice. 2020.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus No. 9: levels of maternal care. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(2):428‐434. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003383
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Obstetric Practice, Wax JR, Barth WH. Planned home birth: committee opinion No. 697. Obstet Gynecol. 2017, reaffirmed 2020;129:117‐122. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002024
Planned Home Birth. American College of Nurse‐Midwives. Planned Home Birth Position Statement. 2016. Silver Spring, MD. https://www.midwife.org/acnm/files/ACNMLibraryData/UPLOADFILENAME/000000000251/Planned‐Home‐Birth‐Dec‐2016.pdf
Watterberg K, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Providing Care for Infants Born at home. Pediatrics. 2020;145(5):e20200626. doi:10.1542/peds.2020-0626
Alliman J, Phillippi JC. Maternal outcomes in birth centers: an integrative review of the literature. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016;61(1):21‐51. doi:10.1111/jmwh.12356
Phillippi JC, Danhausen K, Alliman J, Phillippi RD. Neonatal outcomes in the birth center setting: a systematic review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018;63(1):68‐89.
Bovbjerg ML, Cheyney M, Brown J, Cox KJ, Leeman L. Perspectives on risk: assessment of risk profiles and outcomes among women planning community birth in the United States. Birth. 2017;44(3):209‐221.
Snowden JM, Tilden EL, Snyder J, Quigley B, Caughey AB, Cheng YW. Planned out‐of‐hospital birth and birth outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(27):2642‐2653. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1501738
Tilden EL, Cheyney M, Guise J‐M, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: neonatal outcomes and United States birth setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(4):e401‐e403. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.001
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. 2016. NICE Clinical Guideline 190. Accessed January 5, 2016. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190
Bryant AS, Borders AE. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766 summary: approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):406‐408. doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003081
Stapleton SR, Senjem R. Reaching for excellence: birth center standards and accreditation. In: Cole L, Avery MD, eds. Freestanding Birth Centers. Springer; 2017.
Commission for the Accreditation of Birth Centers. Indicators of Compliance with Standards for Birth Centers. Reference Edition 2.2. https://www.birthcenteraccreditation.org/wp‐content/uploads/2020/04/CABC_IndicatorsRefEd‐2.2_2020‐0401.pdf
Commission for the Accreditation of Birth Centers. Accreditated Birth Centers. Accessed February 13, 2015. https://www.birthcenteraccreditation.org/find‐accredited‐birth‐centers/
Grünebaum A, McCullough LB, Sapra KJ, et al. Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006‐2009. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(4):390.
Grünebaum A, Bornstein E, McLeod‐Sordjan R, et al. The impact of birth settings on pregnancy outcomes in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228:S965‐S976. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.011
Grünebaum A, McCullough LB, Bornstein E, et al. Neonatal outcomes of births in freestanding birth centers and hospitals in the United States, 2016–2019. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(1):116.
Grünebaum A, Chervenak FA. Out‐of‐hospital births in the United States, 2009–2014. J Perinat Med. 2016;44(7):845‐849.
Snowden JM, Bovbjerg ML, Dissanayake M, Basso O. The curse of the perinatal epidemiologist: inferring causation amidst selection. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2018;5(4):379‐387.
Jolles DR, Langford R, Stapleton S, Cesario S, Koci A, Alliman J. Outcomes of childbearing Medicaid beneficiaries engaged in care at strong start birth center sites between 2012 and 2014. Birth. 2017;44(4):298‐305.
Alliman J, Stapleton SR, Wright J, Bauer K, Slider K, Jolles D. Strong start in birth centers: socio‐demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns. Birth. 2019;46(2):234‐243.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. Natality Detailed File. Accessed May 15, 2023. https://wonder.cdc.gov/natality.html
International Confederation of Midwives. Essential Competencies for Basic Midwifery Practice. 2013. International Confederation of Midwives.
International Confederation of Midwives. International definition of the midwife. 2011.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 16.
Illuzzi JL, Stapleton SR, Rathbun L. Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006‐2009. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(2):250. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.005
Stapleton SR, Osborne C, Illuzzi J. Outcomes of care in birth centers: demonstration of a durable model. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013;58(1):3‐14. doi:10.1111/jmwh.12003
Rooks JP, Weatherby NL, Ernst EKM, Stapleton S, Rosen D, Rosenfield A. Outcomes of care in birth centers: the National Birth Center Study. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(26):1804‐1811. doi:10.1056/NEJM198912283212606
Snowden JM, Lyndon A, Kan P, El Ayadi A, Main E, Carmichael SL. Severe maternal morbidity: a comparison of definitions and data sources. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(9):1890‐1897.
Glance LG, Hasley S, Glantz JC, et al. Measuring childbirth outcomes using administrative and birth certificate data. Anesthesiology. 2019;131(2):238‐253.
American Association of Birth Centers. Birth center regulations. American Association of Birth Centers. Accessed May 13, 2023. https://www.birthcenters.org/bc‐regulations
Stapleton S, Wright J, Jolles D. R. Improving the experience of care: results of the American Association of Birth Centers strong start client experience of care registry pilot program, 2015‐2016. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2020;34(1):27‐37.

Auteurs

Lauren Hoehn-Velasco (L)

Department of Economics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Lisa Ross (L)

American Association of Birth Centers, Perkiomenville, Pennsylvania, USA.

R David Phillippi (RD)

Department of Mathematics, Belmont University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Nancy A Niemczyk (NA)

Nurse-Midwife DNP Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Dominic Cammarano (D)

Division of Gynecology, Reading Hospital, Reading, Pennsylvania, USA.

Steven Calvin (S)

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Julia C Phillippi (JC)

Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Jill Alliman (J)

American Association of Birth Centers, Perkiomenville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Frontier Nursing University, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

Susan Rutledge Stapleton (SR)

American Association of Birth Centers, Perkiomenville, Pennsylvania, USA.

Jennifer Wright (J)

American Association of Birth Centers, Perkiomenville, Pennsylvania, USA.

Stanley Fisch (S)

Frontier Nursing University, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

Diana Jolles (D)

Frontier Nursing University, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.

Classifications MeSH