Demographic characteristics, perinatal smoking patterns, and risk for neonatal health complications among pregnant smokers in the United States who begin using electronic cigarettes during pregnancy: A descriptive study using population-based surveillance data.

electronic cigarettes pregnancy public health surveillance smoking smoking cessation vaping

Journal

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco
ISSN: 1469-994X
Titre abrégé: Nicotine Tob Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815751

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 May 2024
Historique:
received: 30 06 2023
medline: 23 5 2024
pubmed: 23 5 2024
entrez: 23 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Health agencies have called for research evaluating e-cigarette (EC) use in supporting prenatal smoking cessation. This study aimed to describe (a) characteristics of smokers who begin using ECs during pregnancy, (b) how frequently smokers reduce or eliminate pre- and post-natal combustible cigarette (CC) use, and (c) risk for neonatal health complications among smokers who initiate ECs during pregnancy. Pregnant women using CCs exclusively pre-pregnancy, who participated in a U.S. surveillance study, were classified by their reported late-pregnancy smoking behavior as CC-exclusive users, EC initiators, or quitters. EC initiators were further subclassified as dual users (used both ECs and CCs) or EC replacers (used ECs exclusively). Of 29,505 pregnant smokers, 1.5% reported using ECs during the last 3 pregnancy months. Among them, 29.7% became EC-exclusive users. EC initiators were disproportionately non-Hispanic White. Relative to quitters, EC initiators had lower income, were less likely to be married, have intended pregnancies, receive first-trimester prenatal care, and participate in a federal assistance program. Compared to CC-exclusive users, EC initiators overall, and dual users specifically, were more likely to reduce pre- and post-natal CC usage relative to pre-pregnancy levels. EC initiators' risk for neonatal health complications fell between quitters and CC-exclusive users, though differences were not statistically significant. Although EC initiators reduced CC use more than CC-exclusive users, only 29.7% reported complete CC cessation, and there was insufficient evidence of reduction in neonatal health complications relative to CC-exclusive users. Currently, ECs should not be considered a viable gestational smoking cessation strategy. Health agencies have identified a critical need for research evaluating the use of e-cigarettes in supporting prenatal smoking cessation. Using the US Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System surveillance study data, we provide real-world evidence that prenatal e-cigarette initiation as a smoking cessation tool is used infrequently among pregnant combustible cigarettes smokers. Most using e-cigarettes in the last three months of pregnancy also used combustible cigarettes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38779997
pii: 7680242
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae119
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

Auteurs

Hui Nian (H)

Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Rachel Odland (R)

Rowan University Department of Psychology, Glassboro, NJ, USA.
Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA.

Samantha Mindlin (S)

Rowan University Department of Psychology, Glassboro, NJ, USA.
Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA.

Lin Ammar (L)

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.

Hilary Tindle (H)

Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
The Vanderbilt Center for Tobacco, Addiction and Lifestyle, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Centers, Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA.

Angela Miller (A)

Division of Population Health Assessment, Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, TN, USA.

Kelly Ryckman (K)

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health - Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Ethan Xie (E)

Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Tina V Hartert (TV)

Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Brittney M Snyder (BM)

Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Steven M Brunwasser (SM)

Rowan University Department of Psychology, Glassboro, NJ, USA.
Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Pingsheng Wu (P)

Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Classifications MeSH