Heterogeneity of glycaemic phenotypes in type 1 diabetes.
Artificial intelligence
Cluster analysis
Continuous glucose monitoring
Diabetes complications
Glycaemia risk index
Glycaemic control
Glycaemic phenotype
Glycaemic variability
Insulin pumps
Machine learning
Type 1 diabetes
Journal
Diabetologia
ISSN: 1432-0428
Titre abrégé: Diabetologia
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0006777
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 May 2024
23 May 2024
Historique:
received:
05
10
2023
accepted:
08
04
2024
medline:
23
5
2024
pubmed:
23
5
2024
entrez:
23
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Our study aims to uncover glycaemic phenotype heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes. In the Study of the French-speaking Society of Type 1 Diabetes (SFDT1), we characterised glycaemic heterogeneity thanks to a set of complementary metrics: HbA We included 618 participants with type 1 diabetes (52.9% men, mean age 40.6 years [SD 14.1]). Our phenotypic tree identified seven glycaemic phenotypes. The 2D phenotypic tree comprised a main branch in the proximal region and glycaemic phenotypes in the distal areas. Dimension 1, the horizontal dimension, was positively associated with GRI (coefficient [95% CI]) (0.54 [0.52, 0.57]), HbA Our study advances the current understanding of the complex glycaemic profile in people with type 1 diabetes and suggests that strategies based on isolated glycaemic metrics might not capture the complexity of the glycaemic phenotypes in real life. Relying on these phenotypes could improve patient stratification in type 1 diabetes care and personalise disease management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38780786
doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06179-4
pii: 10.1007/s00125-024-06179-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
DiMeglio LA, Evans-Molina C, Oram RA (2018) Type 1 diabetes. Lancet 391(10138):2449–2462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31320-5
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31320-5
pubmed: 29916386
pmcid: 6661119
Karges B, Kapellen T, Wagner VM et al (2017) Glycated hemoglobin A1c as a risk factor for severe hypoglycemia in pediatric type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 18(1):51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12348
doi: 10.1111/pedi.12348
pubmed: 26712064
Nordwall M, Abrahamsson M, Dhir M, Fredrikson M, Ludvigsson J, Arnqvist HJ (2015) Impact of HbA1c, followed from onset of type 1 diabetes, on the development of severe retinopathy and nephropathy: the VISS Study (Vascular Diabetic Complications in Southeast Sweden). Diabetes Care 38(2):308–315. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-1203
doi: 10.2337/dc14-1203
pubmed: 25510400
Suh S, Kim JH (2015) Glycemic variability: how do we measure it and why is it important? Diabetes Metab J 39(4):273–282. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2015.39.4.273
doi: 10.4093/dmj.2015.39.4.273
pubmed: 26301188
pmcid: 4543190
Riveline J-P, Schaepelynck P, Chaillous L et al (2012) Assessment of patient-led or physician-driven continuous glucose monitoring in patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes using basal-bolus insulin regimens: a 1-year multicenter study. Diabetes Care 35(5):965–971. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2021
doi: 10.2337/dc11-2021
pubmed: 22456864
pmcid: 3329830
Roussel R, Riveline J-P, Vicaut E et al (2021) Important drop in rate of acute diabetes complications in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes after initiation of flash glucose monitoring in France: the RELIEF study. Diabetes Care 44(6):1368–1376. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1690
doi: 10.2337/dc20-1690
pubmed: 33879536
pmcid: 8247513
Maiorino MI, Signoriello S, Maio A et al (2020) Effects of continuous glucose monitoring on metrics of glycemic control in diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 43(5):1146–1156. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-1459
doi: 10.2337/dc19-1459
pubmed: 32312858
Lu J, Ma X, Zhou J et al (2018) Association of time in range, as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring, with diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 41(11):2370–2376. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-1131
doi: 10.2337/dc18-1131
pubmed: 30201847
Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Riddlesworth TD et al (2019) Validation of time in range as an outcome measure for diabetes clinical trials. Diabetes Care 42(3):400–405. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-1444
doi: 10.2337/dc18-1444
pubmed: 30352896
Snell-Bergeon JK, Roman R, Rodbard D et al (2010) Glycaemic variability is associated with coronary artery calcium in men with Type 1 diabetes: the Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 1 Diabetes study. Diabet Med 27(12):1436–1442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03127.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03127.x
pubmed: 21059097
pmcid: 3052953
Klonoff DC, Wang J, Rodbard D et al (2023) A Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia for continuous glucose monitoring validated by clinician ratings. J Diabetes Sci Technol 17(5):1226–1242. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968221085273
doi: 10.1177/19322968221085273
pubmed: 35348391
Piona C, Marigliano M, Roncarà C et al (2023) Glycemia risk index as a novel metric to evaluate the safety of glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: an observational, multicenter, real-life cohort study. Diabetes Technol Ther 25(7):507–512. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0040
doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0040
pubmed: 37155332
Gold AE, MacLeod KM, Frier BM (1994) Frequency of severe hypoglycemia in patients with type I diabetes with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care 17(7):697–703. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.17.7.697
doi: 10.2337/diacare.17.7.697
pubmed: 7924780
Ahlqvist E, Storm P, Käräjämäki A et al (2018) Novel subgroups of adult-onset diabetes and their association with outcomes: a data-driven cluster analysis of six variables. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 6(5):361–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30051-2
doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30051-2
pubmed: 29503172
Kovatchev B, Lobo B (2023) Clinically similar clusters of daily continuous glucose monitoring profiles: tracking the progression of glycemic control over time. Diabetes Technol Ther 25(8):519–528. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0117
doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0117
pubmed: 37130300
Nair ATN, Wesolowska-Andersen A, Brorsson C et al (2022) Heterogeneity in phenotype, disease progression and drug response in type 2 diabetes. Nat Med 28(5):982–988. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01790-7
doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01790-7
pubmed: 35534565
Qiu X, Mao Q, Tang Y et al (2017) Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories. Nat Methods 14(10):979–982. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4402
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4402
pubmed: 28825705
pmcid: 5764547
Montaser E, Fabris C, Kovatchev B (2022) Essential continuous glucose monitoring metrics: the principal dimensions of glycemic control in diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 24(11):797–804. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2022.0104
doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0104
pubmed: 35714355
Riveline JP, Vergés B, Detournay B et al (2022) Design of a prospective, longitudinal cohort of people living with type 1 diabetes exploring factors associated with the residual cardiovascular risk and other diabetes-related complications: The SFDT1 study. Diabetes Metab 48(3):101306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2021.101306
doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2021.101306
pubmed: 34813929
Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM et al (2019) Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care 42(8):1593–1603. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci19-0028
doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028
pubmed: 31177185
pmcid: 6973648
Monnier L, Colette C, Wojtusciszyn A et al (2017) Toward defining the threshold between low and high glucose variability in diabetes. Diabetes Care 40(7):832–838. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-1769
doi: 10.2337/dc16-1769
pubmed: 28039172
Labbe E, Blanquet M, Gerbaud L et al (2015) A new reliable index to measure individual deprivation: the EPICES score. Eur J Public Health 25(4):604–609. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku231
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku231
pubmed: 25624273
Guilloteau A, Binquet C, Bourredjem A et al (2020) Social deprivation among socio-economic contrasted french areas: using item response theory analysis to assess differential item functioning of the EPICES questionnaire in stroke patients. PLoS One 15(4):e0230661. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230661
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230661
pubmed: 32240217
pmcid: 7117693
de Boer IH, Khunti K, Sadusky T et al (2022) Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 102(5):974–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2022.08.012
doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.08.012
pubmed: 36202661
Inker LA, Eneanya ND, Coresh J et al (2021) New creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations to estimate GFR without race. N Engl J Med 385(19):1737–1749. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2102953
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102953
pubmed: 34554658
pmcid: 8822996
Akinci G, Savelieff MG, Gallagher G, Callaghan BC, Feldman EL (2021) Diabetic neuropathy in children and youth: new and emerging risk factors. Pediatr Diabetes 22(2):132–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.13153
doi: 10.1111/pedi.13153
pubmed: 33205601
van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K (2011) mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 45:1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
doi: 10.18637/jss.v045.i03
Black WR, Thomas I (1998) Accidents on belgium’s motorways: a network autocorrelation analysis. J Transp Geogr 6(1):23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(97)00037-9
doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(97)00037-9
Hoogendoorn CJ, Hernandez R, Schneider S et al (2023) Glycemic risk index profiles and predictors among diverse adults with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 17(5):1226–1242
Kahkoska AR, Adair LA, Aiello AE et al (2019) Identification of clinically relevant dysglycemia phenotypes based on continuous glucose monitoring data from youth with type 1 diabetes and elevated hemoglobin A1c. Pediatr Diabetes 20(5):556–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12856
doi: 10.1111/pedi.12856
pubmed: 30972889
pmcid: 6625874
Boughton CK (2021) Fully closed-loop insulin delivery-are we nearly there yet? Lancet Digit Health 3:e689–e690. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00218-1
doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00218-1
pubmed: 34580054
Pauley ME, Berget C, Messer LH, Forlenza GP (2021) Barriers to uptake of insulin technologies and novel solutions. Med Devices 14:339–354. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S312858
doi: 10.2147/MDER.S312858
Mair C, Wulaningsih W, Jeyam A et al (2019) Glycaemic control trends in people with type 1 diabetes in Scotland 2004–2016. Diabetologia 62(8):1375–1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-4900-7
doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4900-7
pubmed: 31104095
pmcid: 6647722
Dover AR, Strachan MWJ, McKnight JA et al (2021) Socioeconomic deprivation, technology use, C-peptide, smoking and other predictors of glycaemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 38(3):e14445. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14445
doi: 10.1111/dme.14445
pubmed: 33128811
Miller KM, Beck RW, Foster NC, Maahs DM (2020) HbA1c levels in type 1 diabetes from early childhood to older adults: a deeper dive into the influence of technology and socioeconomic status on HbA1c in the T1D exchange clinic registry findings. Diabetes Technol Ther 22(9):645–650. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2019.0393
doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0393
pubmed: 31905008
pmcid: 7640747
Houle J, Lauzier-Jobin F, Beaulieu M-D et al (2016) Socioeconomic status and glycemic control in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a mediation analysis. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 4(1):e000184. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000184
doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000184
pubmed: 27239316
pmcid: 4873951
Lindner LME, Rathmann W, Rosenbauer J (2018) Inequalities in glycaemic control, hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis according to socio-economic status and area-level deprivation in Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Diabet Med 35(1):12–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13519
doi: 10.1111/dme.13519
pubmed: 28945942
de Souza ABC, Correa-Giannella MLC, Gomes MB, Negrato CA, Nery M (2022) Epidemiology and risk factors of hypoglycemia in subjects with type 1 diabetes in Brazil: a cross-sectional, multicenter study. Arch Endocrinol Metab 66(6):784–791. https://doi.org/10.20945/2359-3997000000523
doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000523
pubmed: 36191264
pmcid: 10118760
Lin YK, Fisher SJ, Pop-Busui R (2020) Hypoglycemia unawareness and autonomic dysfunction in diabetes: Lessons learned and roles of diabetes technologies. J Diabetes Investig 11(6):1388–1402. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13290
doi: 10.1111/jdi.13290
pubmed: 32403204
pmcid: 7610104
Brown SA, Kovatchev BP, Raghinaru D et al (2019) Six-month randomized, multicenter trial of closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 381(18):1707–1717. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1907863
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907863
pubmed: 31618560
pmcid: 7076915
Ekhlaspour L, Raghinaru D, Forlenza GP et al (2023) Outcomes in pump- and CGM-baseline use subgroups in the international diabetes closed-loop trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol 17(4):935–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968221089361
doi: 10.1177/19322968221089361
pubmed: 35473359
El Malahi A, Van Elsen M, Charleer S et al (2022) Relationship between time in range, glycemic variability, HbA1c, and complications in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 107(2):e570–e581. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab688
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab688
pubmed: 34534297
Mesa A, Giménez M, Pueyo I et al (2022) Hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia exposure are differentially associated with micro- and macrovascular complications in adults with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 189:109938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109938
doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109938
pubmed: 35662616
Kotlarsky P, Bolotin A, Dorfman K, Knyazer B, Lifshitz T, Levy J (2015) Link between retinopathy and nephropathy caused by complications of diabetes mellitus type 2. Int Ophthalmol 35(1):59–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-014-0018-6
doi: 10.1007/s10792-014-0018-6
pubmed: 25391917
Gusmano MK, Weisz D, Rodwin VG et al (2014) Disparities in access to health care in three French regions. Health Policy 114(1):31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.07.011
doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.07.011
pubmed: 23927846
Herder C, Roden M (2022) A novel diabetes typology: towards precision diabetology from pathogenesis to treatment. Diabetologia 65(11):1770–1781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05625-x
doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05625-x
pubmed: 34981134
pmcid: 9522691