A pilot study on preferences from surgeons to deal with an innovative customized and connected knee prosthesis - A discret choice experiment.


Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 May 2024
Historique:
received: 15 01 2024
revised: 17 04 2024
accepted: 18 04 2024
medline: 24 5 2024
pubmed: 24 5 2024
entrez: 24 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To address the increasing global demand for Total Knee Arthroplasty and reduce the need for revisions, several technologies combining 3D planning and artificial intelligence have emerged. These innovations aim to enhance customization, improve component positioning accuracy and precision. The integration of these advancements paves the way for the development of personalized and connected knee implant. These groundbreaking advancements may necessitate changes in surgical practices. Hence, it is important to comprehend surgeons' intentions in integrating these technologies into their routine procedures. Our study aims to assess how surgeons' preferences will affect the acceptability of using this new implant and associated technologies within the entire care chain. We employed a Discrete Choice Experiment, a predictive technique mirroring real-world healthcare decisions, to assess surgeons' trade-off evaluations and preferences. A total of 90 experienced surgeons, performing a significant number of procedures annually (mostly over 51) answered. Analysis indicates an affinity for technology but limited interest in integrating digital advancements like preoperative software and robotics. However, they are receptive to practice improvements and considering the adoption of future sensors. In conclusion, surgeons prefer customized prostheses via augmented reality, accepting extra cost. Embedded sensor technology is deemed premature by them.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
To address the increasing global demand for Total Knee Arthroplasty and reduce the need for revisions, several technologies combining 3D planning and artificial intelligence have emerged. These innovations aim to enhance customization, improve component positioning accuracy and precision. The integration of these advancements paves the way for the development of personalized and connected knee implant.
Questions/purposes UNASSIGNED
These groundbreaking advancements may necessitate changes in surgical practices. Hence, it is important to comprehend surgeons' intentions in integrating these technologies into their routine procedures. Our study aims to assess how surgeons' preferences will affect the acceptability of using this new implant and associated technologies within the entire care chain.
Methods UNASSIGNED
We employed a Discrete Choice Experiment, a predictive technique mirroring real-world healthcare decisions, to assess surgeons' trade-off evaluations and preferences.
Results UNASSIGNED
A total of 90 experienced surgeons, performing a significant number of procedures annually (mostly over 51) answered. Analysis indicates an affinity for technology but limited interest in integrating digital advancements like preoperative software and robotics. However, they are receptive to practice improvements and considering the adoption of future sensors.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
In conclusion, surgeons prefer customized prostheses via augmented reality, accepting extra cost. Embedded sensor technology is deemed premature by them.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38784553
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30041
pii: S2405-8440(24)06072-9
pmc: PMC11112283
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e30041

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interestsStindel Eric reports financial support was provided by French National Research Agency. Stindel Eric reports a relationship with Ostesys SAS that includes: consulting or advisory. Clave Arnaud reports a relationship with ATF Lapée Médical that includes: consulting or advisory, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Clave Arnaud reports a relationship with Zimmer Biomet that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Clave Arnaud reports a relationship with CAOS France that includes: board membership. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Mathieu Le Stum (M)

Université de Brest, UBO, LATIM, UMR 1101, 22 rue Camille Desmoulins, 29200, Brest, France.
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Inserm, LaTIM, UMR 1101, 22 rue Camille Desmoulins, 29200, Brest, France.

Arnaud Clave (A)

Service d'orthopédie, Clinique Saint George, 2 Avenue de Rimiez, 06100, Nice, France.

Koffi Adzinyo Agbemanyole (K)

Institut Mines-Telecom, IMT Atlantique, LATIM, UMR 1101, M@rsouin, 655 Av. du Technopôle, 29280, Plouzané, France.

Eric Stindel (E)

Université de Brest, UBO, LATIM, UMR 1101, 22 rue Camille Desmoulins, 29200, Brest, France.
Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Brest, CHU Brest, LATIM, UMR 1101, 2 Avenue Foch, 29200, Brest, France.

Myriam Le Goff-Pronost (M)

Institut Mines-Telecom, IMT Atlantique, LATIM, UMR 1101, M@rsouin, 655 Av. du Technopôle, 29280, Plouzané, France.

Classifications MeSH