A Comparison of Guided Bone Regeneration vs. the Shell Technique Using Xenogeneic Bone Blocks in Horizontal Bone Defects: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

biomaterials bone graft bone substitutes guided bone regeneration randomized clinical trial shell technique

Journal

Dentistry journal
ISSN: 2304-6767
Titre abrégé: Dent J (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101716125

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 May 2024
Historique:
received: 14 12 2023
revised: 18 03 2024
accepted: 15 04 2024
medline: 24 5 2024
pubmed: 24 5 2024
entrez: 24 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In cases of severe horizontal atrophy, implant placement requires bone reconstruction procedures. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the outcomes of bone augmentation with simultaneous implant placement using the shell technique to the outcomes of guided bone regeneration (GBR) in cases of severely horizontal bone atrophy. This study was designed as a monocentric, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with a six-month follow-up. Among the primary outcomes of this study, peri-implant bone regeneration and peri-implant bone defect closure were selected. Forty-four patients were recruited and equally divided between two groups. In the GRB group, a horizontal regeneration of 2.31 ± 0.23 mm was observed opposed to a horizontal regeneration of 2.36 ± 0.17 mm in the shell group (

Identifiants

pubmed: 38786535
pii: dj12050137
doi: 10.3390/dj12050137
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Paolo De Angelis (P)

Division of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Oral Surgery, and Implantology Unit, Department of Head and Neck, A. Gemelli University Hospital Foundation (IRCCS) Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Camilla Cavalcanti (C)

Division of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Oral Surgery, and Implantology Unit, Department of Head and Neck, A. Gemelli University Hospital Foundation (IRCCS) Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Paolo Francesco Manicone (PF)

Division of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Oral Surgery, and Implantology Unit, Department of Head and Neck, A. Gemelli University Hospital Foundation (IRCCS) Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Margherita Giorgia Liguori (MG)

Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.

Edoardo Rella (E)

Division of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Oral Surgery, and Implantology Unit, Department of Head and Neck, A. Gemelli University Hospital Foundation (IRCCS) Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Giuseppe De Rosa (G)

Division of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Oral Surgery, and Implantology Unit, Department of Head and Neck, A. Gemelli University Hospital Foundation (IRCCS) Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Alberto Palmieri (A)

Division of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Oral Surgery, and Implantology Unit, Department of Head and Neck, A. Gemelli University Hospital Foundation (IRCCS) Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Antonio D'Addona (A)

Division of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Oral Surgery, and Implantology Unit, Department of Head and Neck, A. Gemelli University Hospital Foundation (IRCCS) Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Classifications MeSH