A Comparison of Guided Bone Regeneration vs. the Shell Technique Using Xenogeneic Bone Blocks in Horizontal Bone Defects: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
biomaterials
bone graft
bone substitutes
guided bone regeneration
randomized clinical trial
shell technique
Journal
Dentistry journal
ISSN: 2304-6767
Titre abrégé: Dent J (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101716125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 May 2024
09 May 2024
Historique:
received:
14
12
2023
revised:
18
03
2024
accepted:
15
04
2024
medline:
24
5
2024
pubmed:
24
5
2024
entrez:
24
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In cases of severe horizontal atrophy, implant placement requires bone reconstruction procedures. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the outcomes of bone augmentation with simultaneous implant placement using the shell technique to the outcomes of guided bone regeneration (GBR) in cases of severely horizontal bone atrophy. This study was designed as a monocentric, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with a six-month follow-up. Among the primary outcomes of this study, peri-implant bone regeneration and peri-implant bone defect closure were selected. Forty-four patients were recruited and equally divided between two groups. In the GRB group, a horizontal regeneration of 2.31 ± 0.23 mm was observed opposed to a horizontal regeneration of 2.36 ± 0.17 mm in the shell group (
Identifiants
pubmed: 38786535
pii: dj12050137
doi: 10.3390/dj12050137
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng