Randomized Controlled Trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation Using the Balance Exercise Assist Robot in Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease.

balance exercise assist robot cardiac rehabilitation older adults robotic rehabilitation

Journal

Journal of cardiovascular development and disease
ISSN: 2308-3425
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Dev Dis
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101651414

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 19 03 2024
revised: 13 04 2024
accepted: 19 04 2024
medline: 24 5 2024
pubmed: 24 5 2024
entrez: 24 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recent studies have investigated the effects of exercise on the functional capacity of older adults; training with a balance exercise assist robot (BEAR) effectively improves posture. This study compared the clinical safety and efficacy of training using BEAR video games to conventional resistance training in older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Ninety patients (mean age: 78 years) hospitalized due to worsening CVD were randomized to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) Group R (conventional resistance training) or Group B (training using BEAR). After appropriate therapy, patients underwent laboratory testing and functional evaluation using the timed up-and-go test (TUG), short physical performance battery (SPPB), and functional independence measure (FIM) just before discharge and 4 months after CR. The rates of CVD readmission, cardiac death, and fall-related fractures were monitored. BEAR had no adverse effects during exercise. At 4 months, TUG and SPPB improved significantly in both groups, with no significant difference between them. FIM motor and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index were significantly improved in Group B versus Group R. There was no significant difference in cardiac events and fall-related fractures between the two groups. CR with BEAR is safe and comparable to conventional resistance training for improving balance in older adults with CVD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Recent studies have investigated the effects of exercise on the functional capacity of older adults; training with a balance exercise assist robot (BEAR) effectively improves posture. This study compared the clinical safety and efficacy of training using BEAR video games to conventional resistance training in older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD).
METHODS METHODS
Ninety patients (mean age: 78 years) hospitalized due to worsening CVD were randomized to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) Group R (conventional resistance training) or Group B (training using BEAR). After appropriate therapy, patients underwent laboratory testing and functional evaluation using the timed up-and-go test (TUG), short physical performance battery (SPPB), and functional independence measure (FIM) just before discharge and 4 months after CR. The rates of CVD readmission, cardiac death, and fall-related fractures were monitored.
RESULTS RESULTS
BEAR had no adverse effects during exercise. At 4 months, TUG and SPPB improved significantly in both groups, with no significant difference between them. FIM motor and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index were significantly improved in Group B versus Group R. There was no significant difference in cardiac events and fall-related fractures between the two groups.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
CR with BEAR is safe and comparable to conventional resistance training for improving balance in older adults with CVD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38786955
pii: jcdd11050133
doi: 10.3390/jcdd11050133
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Akihiro Hirashiki (A)

Department of Cardiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu 474-8511, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8560, Japan.

Atsuya Shimizu (A)

Department of Cardiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu 474-8511, Japan.

Takahiro Kamihara (T)

Department of Cardiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu 474-8511, Japan.

Manabu Kokubo (M)

Department of Cardiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu 474-8511, Japan.

Kakeru Hashimoto (K)

Department of Rehabilitation, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu 474-8511, Japan.

Ikue Ueda (I)

Department of Rehabilitation, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu 474-8511, Japan.

Kenji Sato (K)

Department of Rehabilitation, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu 474-8511, Japan.

Koki Kawamura (K)

Department of Rehabilitation, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu 474-8511, Japan.

Naoki Itoh (N)

Department of Rehabilitation, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu 474-8511, Japan.

Toyoaki Murohara (T)

Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8560, Japan.

Hitoshi Kagaya (H)

Department of Rehabilitation, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu 474-8511, Japan.

Izumi Kondo (I)

Department of Rehabilitation, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu 474-8511, Japan.

Classifications MeSH