DERIVATION AND VALIDATION OF A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FOR THE PREVENTION OF UNPLANNED DIALYSIS.


Journal

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN
ISSN: 1555-905X
Titre abrégé: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101271570

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 May 2024
Historique:
received: 30 10 2023
accepted: 21 05 2024
medline: 24 5 2024
pubmed: 24 5 2024
entrez: 24 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Approximately half of all patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) who progress to kidney failure initiate dialysis in an unplanned fashion which is associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. A novel prediction model designed to identify advanced CKD patients who are at high risk for developing kidney failure over short time frames (6-12 months) may help reduce the rates of unplanned dialysis and improve the quality of transitions from CKD to kidney failure. We performed a retrospective study employing machine learning random forest algorithms incorporating routinely collected age and sex data along with time-varying trends in laboratory measurements to derive and validate six- and 12-month kidney failure risk prediction models in the advanced CKD population. The models were comprehensively characterized in three independent cohorts in Ontario, Canada - derived in a cohort of 1,849 consecutive advanced CKD patients (mean [standard deviation] age 66 [15] years, eGFR 19 [7] mL/min/1.73m2), and validated in two external advanced CKD cohorts (n=1,356; age 69 [14] years, eGFR 22 [7] mL/min/1.73m2). Across all cohorts, 55% of patients experienced kidney failure, of which 35% involved unplanned dialysis. The six- and 12-month models demonstrated excellent discrimination with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88 (95%CI: 0.87-0.89) and 0.87 (95%CI: 0.86-0.87) along with high probabilistic accuracy with Brier scores of 0.10 (95%CI 0.09-0.10) and 0.14 (95%CI 0.13-0.14), respectively. The models were also well-calibrated and delivered timely alerts on a significant number of patients who ultimately initiated dialysis in an unplanned fashion. Similar results were found upon external validation testing. These machine-learning models using routinely collected patient data accurately predict near-future kidney failure risk among the advanced CKD population, and retrospectively deliver advanced warning on a substantial proportion of unplanned dialysis events. Optimal implementation strategies still need to be elucidated.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Approximately half of all patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) who progress to kidney failure initiate dialysis in an unplanned fashion which is associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. A novel prediction model designed to identify advanced CKD patients who are at high risk for developing kidney failure over short time frames (6-12 months) may help reduce the rates of unplanned dialysis and improve the quality of transitions from CKD to kidney failure.
METHODS METHODS
We performed a retrospective study employing machine learning random forest algorithms incorporating routinely collected age and sex data along with time-varying trends in laboratory measurements to derive and validate six- and 12-month kidney failure risk prediction models in the advanced CKD population. The models were comprehensively characterized in three independent cohorts in Ontario, Canada - derived in a cohort of 1,849 consecutive advanced CKD patients (mean [standard deviation] age 66 [15] years, eGFR 19 [7] mL/min/1.73m2), and validated in two external advanced CKD cohorts (n=1,356; age 69 [14] years, eGFR 22 [7] mL/min/1.73m2).
RESULTS RESULTS
Across all cohorts, 55% of patients experienced kidney failure, of which 35% involved unplanned dialysis. The six- and 12-month models demonstrated excellent discrimination with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88 (95%CI: 0.87-0.89) and 0.87 (95%CI: 0.86-0.87) along with high probabilistic accuracy with Brier scores of 0.10 (95%CI 0.09-0.10) and 0.14 (95%CI 0.13-0.14), respectively. The models were also well-calibrated and delivered timely alerts on a significant number of patients who ultimately initiated dialysis in an unplanned fashion. Similar results were found upon external validation testing.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
These machine-learning models using routinely collected patient data accurately predict near-future kidney failure risk among the advanced CKD population, and retrospectively deliver advanced warning on a substantial proportion of unplanned dialysis events. Optimal implementation strategies still need to be elucidated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38787617
doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000489
pii: 01277230-990000000-00393
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Auteurs

Martin M Klamrowski (MM)

Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Ran Klein (R)

Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Christopher McCudden (C)

Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Division of Biochemistry, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

James R Green (JR)

Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Babak Rashidi (B)

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Christine A White (CA)

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Matthew J Oliver (MJ)

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Amber O Molnar (AO)

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario, Canada.

Cedric Edwards (C)

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Tim Ramsay (T)

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Ayub Akbari (A)

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Gregory L Hundemer (GL)

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Classifications MeSH