The mutagenic consequences of defective DNA repair.
DNA repair deficiency
Mutagenesis
cancer mutation signature
genomic instability
homologous recombination
mismatch repair
Journal
DNA repair
ISSN: 1568-7856
Titre abrégé: DNA Repair (Amst)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101139138
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 May 2024
18 May 2024
Historique:
received:
22
03
2024
revised:
10
05
2024
accepted:
14
05
2024
medline:
25
5
2024
pubmed:
25
5
2024
entrez:
24
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Multiple separate repair mechanisms safeguard the genome against various types of DNA damage, and their failure can increase the rate of spontaneous mutagenesis. The malfunction of distinct repair mechanisms leads to genomic instability through different mutagenic processes. For example, defective mismatch repair causes high base substitution rates and microsatellite instability, whereas homologous recombination deficiency is characteristically associated with deletions and chromosome instability. This review presents a comprehensive collection of all mutagenic phenotypes associated with the loss of each DNA repair mechanism, drawing on data from a variety of model organisms and mutagenesis assays, and placing greatest emphasis on systematic analyses of human cancer datasets. We describe the latest theories on the mechanism of each mutagenic process, often explained by reliance on an alternative repair pathway or the error-prone replication of unrepaired, damaged DNA. Aided by the concept of mutational signatures, the genomic phenotypes can be used in cancer diagnosis to identify defective DNA repair pathways.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38788323
pii: S1568-7864(24)00070-3
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103694
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103694Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.