Optimal Scale-Invariant Wavelet Representation and Filtering of Human Otoacoustic Emissions.

Cochlear modeling Otoacoustic emissions Scale-invariance Time-frequency analysis Wavelet transform

Journal

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO
ISSN: 1438-7573
Titre abrégé: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100892857

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 May 2024
Historique:
received: 05 11 2023
accepted: 04 03 2024
medline: 25 5 2024
pubmed: 25 5 2024
entrez: 24 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are generated in the cochlea and recorded in the ear canal either as a time domain waveform or as a collection of complex responses to tones in the frequency domain (Probst et al. J Account Soc Am 89:2027-2067, 1991). They are typically represented either in their original acquisition domain or in its Fourier-conjugated domain. Round-trip excursions to the conjugated domain are often used to perform filtering operations in the computationally simplest way, exploiting the convolution theorem. OAE signals consist of the superposition of backward waves generated in different cochlear regions by different generation mechanisms, over a wide frequency range. The cochlear scaling symmetry (cochlear physics is the same at all frequency scales), which approximately holds in the human cochlea, leaves its fingerprints in the mathematical properties of OAE signals. According to a generally accepted taxonomy (Sher and Guinan Jr, J Acoust Soc Am 105:782-798, 1999), OAEs are generated either by wave-fixed sources, moving with frequency according with the cochlear scaling (as in nonlinear distortion) or by place-fixed sources (as in coherent reflection by roughness). If scaling symmetry holds, the two generation mechanisms yield OAEs with different phase gradient delay: almost null for wave-fixed sources, and long (and scaling as 1/f) for place-fixed sources. Thus, the most effective representation of OAE signals is often that respecting the cochlear scale-invariance, such as the time-frequency domain representation provided by the wavelet transform. In the time-frequency domain, the elaborate spectra or waveforms yielded by the superposition of OAE components from different generation mechanisms assume a much clearer 2-D pattern, with each component localized in a specific and predictable region. The wavelet representation of OAE signals is optimal both for visualization purposes and for designing filters that effectively separate different OAE components, improving both the specificity and the sensitivity of OAE-based applications. Indeed, different OAE components have different physiological meanings, and filtering dramatically improves the signal-to-noise ratio.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38789824
doi: 10.1007/s10162-024-00943-4
pii: 10.1007/s10162-024-00943-4
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK (1991) A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 89:2027–2067
pubmed: 1860995 doi: 10.1121/1.400897
Shera CA, Guinan JJ Jr (1999) Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise from two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am 105:782–798
pubmed: 9972564 doi: 10.1121/1.426948
Shera CA, Guinan JJ Jr, Oxenham AJ (2002) Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:3318–3323
pubmed: 11867706 pmcid: 122516 doi: 10.1073/pnas.032675099
Shera CA, Guinan JJ Jr (2003) Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning. J Acoust Soc Am 113:2762–2772
pubmed: 12765394 doi: 10.1121/1.1557211
de Boer E (1997) Connecting frequency selectivity and nonlinearity for models of the cochlea. Auditory Neurosci 3:377–388
Recio A, Rich NC, Narayan SS, Ruggero MA (1998) Basilar-membrane responses to clicks at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1972–1989
pubmed: 9566320 doi: 10.1121/1.421377
Papoulis A (1962) The Fourier Integral and Its Applications. McGraw Hill, New York
Sisto R, Moleti A, Shera CA (2007) Cochlear reflectivity in transmission-line models and otoacoustic emission characteristic time delays. J Acoust Soc Am 122:3554–3561
pubmed: 18247763 doi: 10.1121/1.2799498
Shera CA (2001) Intensity-invariance of fine time structure in basilar membrane click responses: Implications for cochlear mechanics. J Acoust Soc Am 110:332–348
pubmed: 11508959 doi: 10.1121/1.1378349
Sisto R, Shera CA, Altoè A, Moleti A (2019) Constraints imposed by zero-crossing invariance on cochlear models with two mechanical degrees of freedom. J Acoust Soc Am 146:1685–1695
pubmed: 31590512 pmcid: 6756920 doi: 10.1121/1.5126514
Moleti A, Sisto R, Shera CA (2018) Introducing causality violation for improved DPOAE component unmixing. AIP Conf Proc 1965:090008. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5038497
doi: 10.1063/1.5038497 pubmed: 30089934 pmcid: 6078433
Zweig G, Lipes R, Pierce JR (1976) The cochlear compromise. J Acoust Soc Am 59:975–982
pubmed: 1262596 doi: 10.1121/1.380956
Zweig G (1976) Basilar membrane motion. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 40:619–633
pubmed: 820509 doi: 10.1101/SQB.1976.040.01.058
Zweig G (1991) Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti. J Acoust Soc Am 89:1229–1254
pubmed: 2030212 doi: 10.1121/1.400653
Temchin AN, Rich NC, Ruggero MA (2008) Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers. I. Dependence on characteristic frequency and relation to the magnitudes of cochlear vibrations. J Neurophysiol 100:2889–2898
pubmed: 18701751 pmcid: 2585409 doi: 10.1152/jn.90637.2008
Gorga MP, Neely ST, Kopun J, Tan H (2011) Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 129:817–827
pubmed: 21361440 pmcid: 3070996 doi: 10.1121/1.3531864
de Boer E, Zheng J, Porsov E, Nuttall AL (2008) Inverted direction of wave propagation (IDWP) in the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 123:1513–1521
pubmed: 18345840 doi: 10.1121/1.2828064
Sisto R, Sanjust F, Moleti A (2013) Input/output functions of different-latency components of transient-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 133:2240–2253
pubmed: 23556592 doi: 10.1121/1.4794382
Charaziak KK, Altoè A (2023) Estimating cochlear impulse responses using frequency sweeps. J Acoust Soc Am 153:2251
pubmed: 37092917 pmcid: 10104686 doi: 10.1121/10.0017547
Avan P, Büki B, Petit C (2013) Auditory distortions: origins and functions. Physiol Rev 93:1563–1619
pubmed: 24137017 doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2012
Dhar S, Rogers A, Abdala C (2011) Breaking away: violation of distortion emission phase-frequency invariance at low frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 129:3115–3122
pubmed: 21568414 pmcid: 3108392 doi: 10.1121/1.3569732
Abdala C, Dhar S, Mishra S (2011) The breaking of cochlear scaling symmetry in human newborns and adults. J Acoust Soc Am 129:3104–3114
pubmed: 21568413 pmcid: 3108391 doi: 10.1121/1.3569737
Moleti A, Pistilli D, Sisto R (2017) Evidence for apical-basal transition in the delay of the reflection components of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 141:116–126. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4973866
doi: 10.1121/1.4973866 pubmed: 28147610
Altoè A, Shera CA (2020) The cochlear ear horn: geometric origin of tonotopic variations in auditory signal processing. Sci Rep 10:20528
pubmed: 33239701 pmcid: 7689495 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77042-w
Sisto R, Moleti A (2021) Low-passed outer hair cell response and apical-basal transition in a nonlinear transmission-line cochlear model. J Acoust Soc Am 149:1296–1305
pubmed: 33639784 doi: 10.1121/10.0003569
Nam J-H, Fettiplace R (2012) Optimal electrical properties of outer hair cells ensure cochlear amplification. PLoS ONE 7:e50572
pubmed: 23209783 pmcid: 3507780 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050572
Rabbitt RD (2020) The cochlear outer hair cell speed paradox. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:21880–21888. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2003838117
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003838117 pubmed: 32848062 pmcid: 7486750
Sasmal A, Grosh K (2019) Unified cochlear model for low- and high-frequency mammalian hearing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:13983–13988
pubmed: 31221750 pmcid: 6628805 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1900695116
Sisto R, Belardinelli D, Moleti A (2021) Fluid focusing and viscosity allow high gain and stability of the cochlear response. J Acoust Soc Am 150:4283–4296
pubmed: 34972263 doi: 10.1121/10.0008940
Shera CA, Guinan JJ Jr, Oxenham AJ (2010) Otoacoustic estimation of cochlear tuning: validation in the chinchilla. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 11:343–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-010-0217-4
doi: 10.1007/s10162-010-0217-4 pubmed: 20440634 pmcid: 2914235
Talmadge CL, Tubis A, Long GR, Piskorski P (1998) Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. J Acoust Soc Am 104:1517–1543
pubmed: 9745736 doi: 10.1121/1.424364
Shera CA, Tubis A, Talmadge CL (2000) Interrelations among distortion-product phase-gradient delays: their connection to scaling symmetry and its breaking. J Acoust Soc Am 108:2933–2948
pubmed: 11144585 doi: 10.1121/1.1323234
Mallat SG (1989) A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11:674–693
doi: 10.1109/34.192463
Wit HP, van Dijk P, Avan P (1994) Wavelet analysis of real ear and synthesized click evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 73:141–147
pubmed: 8188542 doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90228-3
Tognola G, Ravazzani P, Grandori F (1997) Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 106:112–122
pubmed: 9112111 doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00007-5
Biswal M, Mishra SK (2018) Comparison of time-frequency methods for analyzing stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 143:626
pubmed: 29495731 pmcid: 5796829 doi: 10.1121/1.5022783
Stockwell RG, Mansinha L, Lowe RP (1996) Localization of the complex spectrum: the S transform. IEEE Trans Signal Process 44:998–1001
doi: 10.1109/78.492555
Jedrzejczak WW, Blinowska KJ, Konopka W, Grzanka A, Durka PJ (2004) Identification of otoacoustic emission components by means of adaptive approximations. J Acoust Soc Am 115:2148–2158
pubmed: 15139626 doi: 10.1121/1.1690077
Notaro G, Al-Maamury AM, Moleti A, Sisto R (2007) Wavelet and matching pursuit estimates of the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission latency. J Acoust Soc Am 122:3576–3585
pubmed: 18247765 doi: 10.1121/1.2799924
Spustek T, Jedrzejczak WW, Blinowska KJ (2015) Matching pursuit with asymmetric functions for signal decomposition and parameterization. PLoS ONE 10:e0131007
pubmed: 26115480 pmcid: 4482735 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131007
Sisto R, Moleti A, Lucertini M (2001) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and relaxation dynamics of long decay time OAEs in audiometrically normal and impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 109:638–647
pubmed: 11248970 doi: 10.1121/1.1336502
Moleti A, Sisto R, Tognola G, Parazzini M, Ravazzani P, Grandori F (2005) Otoacoustic emission latency, cochlear tuning, and hearing functionality in neonates. J Acoust Soc Am 118:1576–1584
pubmed: 16240818 doi: 10.1121/1.2000769
Shera CA (2001) Frequency glides in click responses of the basilar membrane and auditory nerve: their scaling behavior and origin in traveling-wave dispersion. J Acoust Soc Am 109:2023–2034
pubmed: 11386555 doi: 10.1121/1.1366372
Cohen L (1989) Time-frequency distributions - a review. Proc IEEE 77:941–981
doi: 10.1109/5.30749
Choi HI, Williams WJ (1989) Improved time-frequency representation of multicomponent signals using exponential kernels. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Processing 37:862–871
doi: 10.1109/ASSP.1989.28057
Wu HT, Liu YW (2018) Analyzing transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions by concentration of frequency and time. J Acoust Soc Am 144:448. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5047749
doi: 10.1121/1.5047749 pubmed: 30075682
Liu TC, Liu YW, Wu HT (2021) “Denoising click-evoked otoacoustic emission signals by optimal shrinkage. J Acoust Soc Am 149:2659. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0004264
doi: 10.1121/10.0004264 pubmed: 33940909
He N, Schmiedt R, A. (1997) Fine structure of the 2 f1–f2 acoustic distortion products: effects of primary level and frequency ratios. J Acoust Soc Am 101:3554–3565
pubmed: 9193044 doi: 10.1121/1.418316
Mauermann M, Uppenkamp S, van Hengel PW, Kollmeier B (1999) Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. I. Fine structure and higher-order DPOAE as a function of the frequency ratio f2/f1. J Acoust Soc Am 106:3473–3483
pubmed: 10615687 doi: 10.1121/1.428200
Mauermann M, Uppenkamp S, van Hengel PW, Kollmeier B (1999) Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. II. Fine structure for different shapes of cochlear hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 106:3484–3491
pubmed: 10615688 doi: 10.1121/1.428201
Dhar S, Talmadge CL, Long GR, Tubis A (2002) Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structure. J Acoust Soc Am 112:2882–2897
pubmed: 12509010 doi: 10.1121/1.1516757
Long GR, Talmadge CL, Lee J (2008) Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries. J Acoust Soc Am 124:1613–1626
pubmed: 19045653 doi: 10.1121/1.2949505
Schoonhoven R, Prijs VF, Schneider S (2001) ‘DPOAE group delays versus electrophysiological measures of cochlear delay in normal human ears.’ J Acoust Soc Am 109:1503–1512
pubmed: 11325122 doi: 10.1121/1.1354987
Moleti A, Longo F, Sisto R (2012) Time-frequency domain filtering of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 132:2455–2467
pubmed: 23039440 doi: 10.1121/1.4751537
Talmadge CL, Long GR, Tubis A, Dhar S (1999) Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 105:275–292
pubmed: 9921655 doi: 10.1121/1.424584
Abdala C, Luo P, Shera CA (2015) Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns. J Acoust Soc Am 138:3785–3799
pubmed: 26723333 pmcid: 4691260 doi: 10.1121/1.4937611
Vetesník A, Vencovský V, Gummer AW (2022) An additional source of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions from perturbation of nonlinear force by reflection from inhomogeneities. J Acoust Soc Am 152:1660–1682
pubmed: 36182298 doi: 10.1121/10.0013992
Sisto R, Shera CA, Moleti A (2018) Negative-delay sources in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 360:25–30
pubmed: 29287918 doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.12.011
Zweig G, Shera CA (1995) The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 98:2018–2047. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413320
doi: 10.1121/1.413320 pubmed: 7593924
Sisto R, Moleti A, Shera CA (2015) On the spatial distribution of the reflection sources of different latency components of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 137:768–776
pubmed: 25698011 pmcid: 4336253 doi: 10.1121/1.4906583
Shera CA (2007) Laser amplification with a twist: traveling-wave propagation and gain functions from throughout the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 122:2738
pubmed: 18189566 doi: 10.1121/1.2783205
Jedrzejczak WW, Bell A, Skarzynski PH, Kochanek K, Skarzynski H (2012) Time-frequency analysis of linear and nonlinear otoacoustic emissions and removal of a short-latency stimulus artifact. J Acoust Soc Am 131:2200–2208
pubmed: 22423716 doi: 10.1121/1.3682043
Kalluri R, Shera CA (2007) Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing. J Acoust Soc Am 122:3562–3575. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2793604
doi: 10.1121/1.2793604 pubmed: 18247764
Sisto R, Moleti A (2007) Transient evoked otoacoustic emission latency and cochlear tuning at different stimulus levels. J Acoust Soc Am 122:2183–2190
pubmed: 17902854 doi: 10.1121/1.2769981
Moleti A, Sisto R (2016) Estimating cochlear tuning dependence on stimulus level and frequency from the delay of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 140:945
pubmed: 27586727 doi: 10.1121/1.4960588
Moleti A, Sisto R (2003) Objective estimates of cochlear tuning by otoacoustic emission analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 113:423–429
pubmed: 12558279 doi: 10.1121/1.1523389
Shera CA, Bergevin C (2012) Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data. J Acoust Soc Am 132:927–943
pubmed: 22894215 pmcid: 3427360 doi: 10.1121/1.4730916
Abdala C, Ortmann AJ, Shera CA (2018) Reflection- and distortion-source otoacoustic emissions: evidence for increased irregularity in the human cochlea during aging. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 19:493–510
pubmed: 29968098 pmcid: 6226410 doi: 10.1007/s10162-018-0680-x

Auteurs

Arturo Moleti (A)

Department of Physics and NAST Centre - University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy. moleti@roma2.infn.it.

Classifications MeSH