Efficacy of Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) + HIPEC in Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

HIPEC cytoreductive surgery gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis

Journal

Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 May 2024
Historique:
received: 02 04 2024
revised: 11 05 2024
accepted: 16 05 2024
medline: 25 5 2024
pubmed: 25 5 2024
entrez: 25 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is one of deadliest metastatic patterns of gastric cancer, being associated with a median overall survival (OS) of 4 months. Up to now, palliative systemic chemotherapy (pSC) has been the only recommended treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate a potential survival benefit after CRS + HIPEC compared to pSC. A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines in March 2024. Manuscripts reporting patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer treated with CRS + HIPEC were included. A meta-analysis was performed, comparing the survival results between the CRS + HIPEC and pSC groups, and the primary outcome was the comparison in terms of OS. We performed random-effects meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs). We assessed heterogeneity using the Q2 statistic. Out of the 24 papers included, 1369 patients underwent CRS + HIPEC, with a median OS range of 9.8-28.2 months; and 103 patients underwent pSC, with a median OS range of 4.9-8 months. CRS + HIPEC was associated with significantly increased survival compared to palliative systemic chemotherapy (-1.8954 (95% CI: -2.5761 to -1.2146; CRS + HIPEC could provide survival advantages in gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis compared to pSC.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Peritoneal carcinomatosis is one of deadliest metastatic patterns of gastric cancer, being associated with a median overall survival (OS) of 4 months. Up to now, palliative systemic chemotherapy (pSC) has been the only recommended treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate a potential survival benefit after CRS + HIPEC compared to pSC.
METHODS METHODS
A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines in March 2024. Manuscripts reporting patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer treated with CRS + HIPEC were included. A meta-analysis was performed, comparing the survival results between the CRS + HIPEC and pSC groups, and the primary outcome was the comparison in terms of OS. We performed random-effects meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs). We assessed heterogeneity using the Q2 statistic.
RESULTS RESULTS
Out of the 24 papers included, 1369 patients underwent CRS + HIPEC, with a median OS range of 9.8-28.2 months; and 103 patients underwent pSC, with a median OS range of 4.9-8 months. CRS + HIPEC was associated with significantly increased survival compared to palliative systemic chemotherapy (-1.8954 (95% CI: -2.5761 to -1.2146;
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
CRS + HIPEC could provide survival advantages in gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis compared to pSC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38792007
pii: cancers16101929
doi: 10.3390/cancers16101929
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Lodovica Langellotti (L)

General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Claudio Fiorillo (C)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Giorgio D'Annibale (G)

General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Edoardo Panza (E)

General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Fabio Pacelli (F)

General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Department of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Sergio Alfieri (S)

General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Department of Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Andrea Di Giorgio (A)

Department of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Francesco Santullo (F)

Department of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Classifications MeSH