Serological Correlates of Protection Induced by COVID-19 Vaccination in the Working Age Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines humoral immunity immune protection occupational health surrogate of protection

Journal

Vaccines
ISSN: 2076-393X
Titre abrégé: Vaccines (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101629355

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 May 2024
Historique:
received: 03 04 2024
revised: 25 04 2024
accepted: 01 05 2024
medline: 25 5 2024
pubmed: 25 5 2024
entrez: 25 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

COVID-19 vaccines represent effective public health measures in contrasting the pandemic worldwide. However, protection at the individual-level, which is of crucial importance from an occupational health perspective, is commonly assessed by a serological correlate of protection (CoP) for SARS-CoV-2, which has not yet been determined. The emergence of variants of concern (VOCs) that have shown high rates of breakthrough infections has further complicated the understanding of immune protection against infection. To define a potential serological correlate of protection induced by the COVID-19 vaccination, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to summarize the evidence concerning the binding antibody concentration corresponding to a protective effect. Eighteen and four studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative analyses, respectively. The protection against infection was shown for anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) titers ranging from 154 to 168.2 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL during the pre-Omicron period, while ranging from 1235 to 3035 BAU/mL in the Omicron period. Pooling the results from the studies concerning anti-RBD and anti-Spike antibody titer, we found a mean of 1341.5 BAU/mL and 1400.1 BAU/mL, respectively. These findings suggest that although a fixed serological threshold corresponding to protection against different SARS-CoV-2 variants is not yet definable, higher binding antibody concentrations are associated with increased protective effects.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38793745
pii: vaccines12050494
doi: 10.3390/vaccines12050494
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Alborz Rahmani (A)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.

Alfredo Montecucco (A)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Occupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.

Luca Priano (L)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Occupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.

Lucia Mandolini (L)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Occupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.

Guglielmo Dini (G)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Occupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.

Paolo Durando (P)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Occupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.

Classifications MeSH