Comparison of testing methods assessing the in vitro efficacy of the combination of aztreonam with avibactam on multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli.


Journal

Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials
ISSN: 1476-0711
Titre abrégé: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101152152

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 May 2024
Historique:
received: 29 02 2024
accepted: 19 05 2024
medline: 26 5 2024
pubmed: 26 5 2024
entrez: 25 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) combination shows promising effectiveness on most carbapenemase-producing Gram-negatives, yet standardized antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) methods for evaluating the combination in clinical laboratories is lacking. We aimed to evaluate different ATM-AVI AST approaches. 96 characterized carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates belonging to 9 Enterobacterales (EB; n = 80) and P. aeruginosa (PA; n = 16) species, including 90 carbapenemase producers and 72 strains resistant to both CAZ-AVI and ATM, were tested. Paper disk elution (DE; Bio-Rad) and E-test gradient strips stacking (SS; bioMérieux) were performed for the ATM + CAZ-AVI combination. MIC Test Strip (MTS; Liofilchem) was evaluated for ATM-AVI MIC determination. Results were interpreted applying ATM clinical breakpoints of the EUCAST guidelines and compared to the broth microdilution method (Sensititre, Thermofisher). According to broth microdilution method, 93% of EB and 69% of PA were tested susceptible to ATM-AVI. The synergistic effect of ATM-AVI was of 95% for EB, but of only 17% for PA. The MTS method yielded higher categorical and essential agreement (CA/EA) rates for both EB (89%/91%) and PA (94%/94%) compared to SS, where the rates were 87%/83% for EB and 81%/81% for PA. MTS and SS yielded 2 and 3 major discrepancies, respectively, while 3 very major discrepancies each were observed for both methods. Concerning the DE method, CA reached 91% for EB and 81% for PA, but high number of very major discrepancies were observed for EB (n = 6; 8%) and for PA (n = 3; 19%). The ATM-AVI association displayed excellent in vitro activity against highly resistant clinical Enterobacterales strains. MTS method offers accurate ATM-AVI AST results, while the SS method might serve as better alternative then DE method in assessing the efficacy of ATM + CAZ-AVI combination. However, further investigation is needed to confirm the methods' ability to detect ATM-AVI resistance.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) combination shows promising effectiveness on most carbapenemase-producing Gram-negatives, yet standardized antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) methods for evaluating the combination in clinical laboratories is lacking. We aimed to evaluate different ATM-AVI AST approaches.
METHODS METHODS
96 characterized carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates belonging to 9 Enterobacterales (EB; n = 80) and P. aeruginosa (PA; n = 16) species, including 90 carbapenemase producers and 72 strains resistant to both CAZ-AVI and ATM, were tested. Paper disk elution (DE; Bio-Rad) and E-test gradient strips stacking (SS; bioMérieux) were performed for the ATM + CAZ-AVI combination. MIC Test Strip (MTS; Liofilchem) was evaluated for ATM-AVI MIC determination. Results were interpreted applying ATM clinical breakpoints of the EUCAST guidelines and compared to the broth microdilution method (Sensititre, Thermofisher).
RESULTS RESULTS
According to broth microdilution method, 93% of EB and 69% of PA were tested susceptible to ATM-AVI. The synergistic effect of ATM-AVI was of 95% for EB, but of only 17% for PA. The MTS method yielded higher categorical and essential agreement (CA/EA) rates for both EB (89%/91%) and PA (94%/94%) compared to SS, where the rates were 87%/83% for EB and 81%/81% for PA. MTS and SS yielded 2 and 3 major discrepancies, respectively, while 3 very major discrepancies each were observed for both methods. Concerning the DE method, CA reached 91% for EB and 81% for PA, but high number of very major discrepancies were observed for EB (n = 6; 8%) and for PA (n = 3; 19%).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The ATM-AVI association displayed excellent in vitro activity against highly resistant clinical Enterobacterales strains. MTS method offers accurate ATM-AVI AST results, while the SS method might serve as better alternative then DE method in assessing the efficacy of ATM + CAZ-AVI combination. However, further investigation is needed to confirm the methods' ability to detect ATM-AVI resistance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38796461
doi: 10.1186/s12941-024-00708-0
pii: 10.1186/s12941-024-00708-0
doi:

Substances chimiques

Aztreonam G2B4VE5GH8
Azabicyclo Compounds 0
Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
avibactam 7352665165
Drug Combinations 0
beta-Lactamases EC 3.5.2.6
Bacterial Proteins 0
carbapenemase EC 3.5.2.6

Types de publication

Journal Article Comparative Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

47

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of ATM-AVI in the Treatment of Serious Infection Due to MBL-producing Gram-negative Bacteria. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03580044.
A Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Aztreonam-Avibactam (ATM-AVI) ± Metronidazole (MTZ) Versus Meropenem (MER) ± Colistin (COL) for the Treatment of Serious Infections Due to Gram Negative Bacteria. (REVISIT). ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03329092.
Falcone M, et al. Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam plus Aztreonam in patients with bloodstream infections caused by metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(11):1871–8.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa586 pubmed: 32427286
Marshall S, et al. Can ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam overcome beta-lactam resistance conferred by metallo-beta-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae? Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02243-16 .
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02243-16 pubmed: 29109158 pmcid: 5740343
Bhatnagar A, et al. Aztreonam-avibactam susceptibility testing program for metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in the antibiotic resistance laboratory network, march 2019 to December 2020. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65(8):e0048621.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00486-21 pubmed: 34060895
Lu G, et al. In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities of ceftazidime/avibactam alone or in combination with Aztreonam against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;15:7107–16.
doi: 10.2147/IDR.S385240 pubmed: 36506837 pmcid: 9733440
Sreenivasan P, et al. In-vitro susceptibility testing methods for the combination of ceftazidime-avibactam with aztreonam in metallobeta-lactamase producing organisms: role of combination drugs in antibiotic resistance era. J Antibiot. 2022;75(8):454–62.
doi: 10.1038/s41429-022-00537-3
Biagi M, et al. Searching for the optimal treatment for metallo- and serine-beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae: aztreonam in combination with ceftazidime-avibactam or meropenem-vaborbactam. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01426-19 .
doi: 10.1128/AAC.01426-19 pubmed: 31570403 pmcid: 6879253
Aslan AT, et al. In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review. Front Med. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1249030 .
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1249030
Paul M, et al. European society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases (ESCMID) guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (endorsed by European society of intensive care medicine). Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28(4):521–47.
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.11.025 pubmed: 34923128
Khan A, et al. Evaluation of susceptibility testing methods for aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam combination therapy on extensively drug-resistant gram-negative organisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65(11):e0084621.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00846-21 pubmed: 34424044
The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 13.1. 2023. http://www.eucast.org .
Mauri C, et al. The revival of aztreonam in combination with avibactam against metallo-beta-lactamase-producing gram-negatives: a systematic review of in vitro studies and clinical cases. Antibiotics. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10081012 .
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10081012 pubmed: 34827279 pmcid: 8615000
Cardot ME. et al. Evaluation of the MTS aztreonam-avibactam strip (Liofilchem) on New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-04766-2
Huang T-D, Montesinos I, Evrard S, Berhin C, Bouchahrouf W, Hoebeke M, Wallemme I, Denis O. Microbiological surveillance of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) in Belgium. Basel: ECCMID; 2023.
Merad Y, et al. Case report: continuous infusions of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam in combination through elastomeric infusors for 12 weeks for the treatment of bone and joint infections due to metallo-beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales. Front Med. 2023;10:1224922.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1224922
Larcher R, et al. Last resort beta-lactam antibiotics for treatment of New-Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales and other difficult-to-treat resistance in gram-negative bacteria: a real-life study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:1048633.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1048633 pubmed: 36544909 pmcid: 9762507
Emeraud C, et al. Aztreonam plus clavulanate, tazobactam, or avibactam for treatment of infections caused by metallo-beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00010-19 .
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00010-19 pubmed: 31285233 pmcid: 6709480
Lee M, Abbey T, Biagi M, Wenzler E. Activity of aztreonam in combination with ceftazidime-avibactam against serine- and metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;99(1):115227.
doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115227 pubmed: 33086177
Karlowsky JA, et al. In Vitro activity of aztreonam-avibactam against Enterobacteriaceae and pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated by clinical laboratories in 40 countries from 2012 to 2015. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00472-17 .
doi: 10.1128/AAC.00472-17 pubmed: 29084745 pmcid: 5740317
Sadek M, Juhas M, Poirel L, Nordmann P. Genetic features leading to reduced susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam among metallo-beta-lactamase-producing escherichia coli isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01659-20 .
doi: 10.1128/AAC.01659-20 pubmed: 32988825 pmcid: 7674043
Verschelden G, et al. Aztreonam-avibactam synergy, a validation and comparison of diagnostic tools. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1322180.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1322180 pubmed: 38094627 pmcid: 10716278
Deschamps M, Dauwalder O, Dortet L. Comparison of ETEST(R) superposition method and the MTS Aztreonam-avibactam strip with the reference method for aztreonam/avibactam susceptibility testing. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad407 .
doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad407
Zou C, et al. In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates collected from three secondary hospitals in southwest china between 2018 and 2019. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:3563–8.
doi: 10.2147/IDR.S273989 pubmed: 33116675 pmcid: 7567573
Zhang B, et al. In vitro activity of aztreonam-avibactam against metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae-A multicenter study in China. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;97:11–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.075 pubmed: 32473388

Auteurs

Corentin Deckers (C)

National Reference Center for Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli, CHU UCL Namur and Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Gaston Therasse, 1, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium. corentin.deckers@uclouvain.be.

Florian Bélik (F)

National Reference Center for Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli, CHU UCL Namur and Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Gaston Therasse, 1, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.

Olivier Denis (O)

National Reference Center for Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli, CHU UCL Namur and Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Gaston Therasse, 1, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.

Pierre Bogaerts (P)

National Reference Center for Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli, CHU UCL Namur and Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Gaston Therasse, 1, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.

Isabel Montesinos (I)

National Reference Center for Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli, CHU UCL Namur and Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Gaston Therasse, 1, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.

Catherine Berhin (C)

National Reference Center for Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli, CHU UCL Namur and Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Gaston Therasse, 1, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.

Warda Bouchahrouf (W)

National Reference Center for Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli, CHU UCL Namur and Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Gaston Therasse, 1, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.

Martin Hoebeke (M)

National Reference Center for Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli, CHU UCL Namur and Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Gaston Therasse, 1, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.

Stephanie Evrard (S)

National Reference Center for Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli, CHU UCL Namur and Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Gaston Therasse, 1, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.

Nicolas Gilliard (N)

National Reference Center for Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli, CHU UCL Namur and Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Gaston Therasse, 1, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.

Merve Okur (M)

National Reference Center for Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli, CHU UCL Namur and Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Gaston Therasse, 1, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.

Te-Din Huang (TD)

National Reference Center for Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli, CHU UCL Namur and Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Gaston Therasse, 1, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH