Revision of restrictive bariatric procedures in elderly patients: results at a 5-year follow-up.
Elderly
Long-term weight loss
Metabolic and bariatric surgery
Revisional bariatric surgery
Safety
Journal
Updates in surgery
ISSN: 2038-3312
Titre abrégé: Updates Surg
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101539818
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 May 2024
26 May 2024
Historique:
received:
23
02
2024
accepted:
18
05
2024
medline:
26
5
2024
pubmed:
26
5
2024
entrez:
26
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Revisional Bariatric Surgery (RBS) is increasing in popularity. Elderly patients (> 65 years old) are sometimes referred for RBS evaluation. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes of elderly patients undergoing RBS. A retrospective analysis of a cohort from a single-tertiary bariatric center. All elderly patients undergoing RBS after restrictive procedures between 2012 and 2022 were included. Thirty Nine patients undergoing RBS were included in the comparative analysis - 23 patients (57.5%) after adjustable gastric banding (s/p LAGB) and 16 patients (40%) after Sleeve Gastrectomy (s/p SG). The mean age and body mass index (BMI) of patients were comparable (67.2 ± 2.8 years and 38.3 ± 7.4, respectively). There was no difference in associated medical problems except reflux which was higher in s/p SG (68% vs. 13%; p < 0.001). The mean time interval between surgeries was 8.7 ± 5.1 years. The surgeries included One anastomosis gastric bypass (n = 22), SG (n = 8) and Roux-en-y gastric bypass (n = 9). Early major complication rates were comparable (4.3% and 12.5%; p = 0.36), and readmission rate was higher in patients s/p SG (p = 0.03). Ninety percent of patients were available to a follow-up of 59.8 months. The mean BMI and total weight loss was 29.2 and 20.3%, respectively with no difference between groups. The rate of patients with associated medical problems at last follow-up was significantly reduced. Five patients (12.5%) underwent revisional surgery due to complications during follow-up. In conclusion, RBS in the elderly is associated with a reasonable complication rate and is effective in terms of weight loss and improvement of associated medical problems in a 5-year follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38796821
doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01888-2
pii: 10.1007/s13304-024-01888-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Sjöström L (2013) Review of the key results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) trial—a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med 273(3):219–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12012 . (Epub 2013 Feb 8 PMID: 23163728)
doi: 10.1111/joim.12012
pubmed: 23163728
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Ramos A, Shikora S, Kow L (2021) Bariatric surgery survey 2018: similarities and disparities among the 5 IFSO chapters. Obes Surg 31(5):1937–1948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05207-7
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05207-7
pubmed: 33432483
pmcid: 7800839
Kaplan U, Romano-Zelekha O, Goitein D, Keren D, Gralnek IM, Boker LK, Sakran N (2020) Trends in bariatric surgery: a 5-year analysis of the Israel national bariatric surgery registry. Obes Surg 30(5):1761–1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04426-2 . (PMID: 32008257)
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04426-2
pubmed: 32008257
Strong AT, Guerrón AD (2022) Revisional bariatric surgery for chronic complications necessitates custom surgical solutions. Mini-invasive Surg 6:37. https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.137
doi: 10.20517/2574-1225.2021.137
Almalki OM, Lee WJ, Chen JC et al (2018) Revisional gastric bypass for failed restrictive procedures: comparison of single-anastomosis (mini-) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 28:970–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2991-0
doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2991-0
pubmed: 29101719
Noria SF, Shelby RD, Atkins KD, Nguyen NT, Gadde KM (2023) Weight regain after bariatric surgery: scope of the problem, causes, prevention, and treatment. Curr Diab Rep 23(3):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-023-01498-z
doi: 10.1007/s11892-023-01498-z
pubmed: 36752995
pmcid: 9906605
El Ansari W, Elhag W (2021) Weight regain and insufficient weight loss after bariatric surgery: definitions, prevalence, mechanisms, predictors, prevention and management strategies, and knowledge gaps-a scoping review. Obes Surg 31(4):1755–1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05160-5
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05160-5
pubmed: 33555451
pmcid: 8012333
Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aarts E et al (2023) American Society of metabolic and bariatric surgery (ASMBS) and international federation for the surgery of obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO) indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery [published correction appears in Obes Surg. 2022 Nov 29]. Obes Surg 33(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06332-1
doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06332-1
pubmed: 36336720
Iranmanesh P, Boudreau V, Ramji K, Barlow K, Lovrics O, Anvari M (2022) Outcomes of bariatric surgery in elderly patients: a registry-based cohort study with 3-year follow-up. Int J Obes (Lond) 46(3):574–580. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-01031-w . (Epub 2021 Nov 26 PMID: 34837011)
doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-01031-w
pubmed: 34837011
Holtestaul T, Kuckelman J, Derickson M, Vigueras V, Reyes A, Bingham J, Sebesta J (2021) Efficacy and safety of bariatric revisions in patients older than 65 years old. Am J Surg 221(6):1221–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.054 . (Epub 2021 Apr 2 PMID: 33840444)
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.054
pubmed: 33840444
Dowgiałło-Gornowicz N, Lech P, Major P; Collaborative Study Group (2023) Bariatric and metabolic surgery in patients older than 65 years—a multicenter study. Obes Surg 33(10):3106–3111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06750-9
Zarzycki P, Rymarowicz J, Małczak P et al (2023) Revisional bariatric procedures in the group of patients over 60 years of age: a multicenter cohort study (PROSS Study). Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 18(4):671–679. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2023.133843
doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.133843
pubmed: 38239577
pmcid: 10793152
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2 . (PMID: 19638912)
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
pubmed: 19638912
Riddle MC, Cefalu WT, Evans PH et al (2021) Consensus report: definition and interpretation of remission in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci21-0034
doi: 10.2337/dci21-0034
pubmed: 34548282
pmcid: 8929179
Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, Khan NA, Poulter NR, Prabhakaran D, Ramirez A, Schlaich M, Stergiou GS, Tomaszewski M, Wainford RD, Williams B, Schutte AE (2020) International society of hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines. Hypertension 75(6):1334–1357. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15026 . (Epub 2020 May 6 PMID: 32370572)
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15026
pubmed: 32370572
European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation; Reiner Z, Catapano AL, De Backer G, Graham I, Taskinen MR, Wiklund O, Agewall S, Alegria E, Chapman MJ, Durrington P, Erdine S, Halcox J, Hobbs R, Kjekshus J, Filardi PP, Riccardi G, Storey RF, Wood D; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG) 2008–2010 and 2010–2012 Committees (2011) ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the task force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J 32(14):1769–818. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr158
Hany M, Zidan A, Ibrahim M, Sabry A, Agayby ASS, Mourad M, Torensma B (2024) Revisional one-step bariatric surgical techniques after unsuccessful laparoscopic gastric band: a retrospective cohort study with 2-year follow-up. Obes Surg
Andrea L, Stéphane B, Saadeddinne J, Luca P, Camille J (2020) Revision surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: a nationwide study with 10 years of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis 16(10):1497–1504
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.05.021
Omar T, Juan FMD, Croner RS (2023) Christine stroh outcome of revisional bariatric surgery after failed sleeve gastrectomy: a German multicenter study. Obes Surg
Salvatore G, Mikael V (2015) Bariatric surgery in elderly patients: a systematic review. Clin Interv Aging 13(10):1627–1635
Musella M, Berardi G, Velotti N, Schiavone V, Manetti C, Vitiello A (2023) Safety and efficacy of OAGB/MGB during the learning curve: setting a benchmark in a bariatric center of excellence. Updates Surg 75(1):169–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01380-9
doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01380-9
pubmed: 36169887
Musella M, Bruni V, Greco F et al (2019) Conversion from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): preliminary data from a multicenter retrospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 15(8):1332–1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.026
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.026
pubmed: 31272866
Kermansaravi M, Parmar C, Chiappetta S et al (2023) Best practice approach for redo-surgeries after sleeve gastrectomy, an expert’s modified Delphi consensus. Surg Endosc 37(3):1617–1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09879-x
doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09879-x
pubmed: 36693918