Evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel polysaccharide hemostatic system during surgery: A multicenter multispecialty prospective randomized controlled trial.

Cardiac surgery General surgery Hemostasis Hemostatic agent Intraoperative bleeding polysaccharide Postoperative bleeding Urologic surgery

Journal

Surgery open science
ISSN: 2589-8450
Titre abrégé: Surg Open Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101768812

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 05 01 2024
revised: 10 04 2024
accepted: 28 04 2024
medline: 27 5 2024
pubmed: 27 5 2024
entrez: 27 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Operative blood loss is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality in surgery. Hemostatic agents are used as adjuncts for hemostasis during surgery and help to prevent postoperative bleeding. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of an investigational polysaccharide hemostatic (PH) topical product compared to a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved control in clinical use comprising microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH) to achieve hemostasis of bleeding surfaces during surgery. This prospective multicenter trial enrolled patients undergoing open elective cardiac, general, or urologic surgery. Patients were stratified by bleeding severity and therapeutic area, then randomized 1:1 to receive PH or MPH. Bleeding assessments occurred intraoperatively using a novel bleeding assessment methodology. Primary endpoint was noninferiority as compared with control via effective hemostasis at 7 min. Patients were monitored and followed daily in the postoperative period until time of discharge and again at 6 weeks. Overall survival was assessed in oncology patients at 24 months. Safety of PH vs. MPH was determined by comparing relative incidence of adverse events. Across 19 centers, 324 (161 PH, 163 MPH) patients were randomized (48 % general surgery, 27 % cardiac surgery, and 25 % urologic surgery). PH was noninferior to MPH and met the primary endpoint of hemostatic success at 7 min at a non-inferiority margin of 10 %. No significant differences were found in adverse event rates. Six deaths were reported within the 6-week follow-up period. No difference in overall survival was observed at 2 years (76 % PH vs. 74 % MPH, Across three therapeutic areas, PH was noninferior to MPH at all hemostasis assessment time points with no safety concerns. PH is an effective alternative to MPH for hemostasis during surgery.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02359994.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Operative blood loss is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality in surgery. Hemostatic agents are used as adjuncts for hemostasis during surgery and help to prevent postoperative bleeding. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of an investigational polysaccharide hemostatic (PH) topical product compared to a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved control in clinical use comprising microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH) to achieve hemostasis of bleeding surfaces during surgery.
Study design UNASSIGNED
This prospective multicenter trial enrolled patients undergoing open elective cardiac, general, or urologic surgery. Patients were stratified by bleeding severity and therapeutic area, then randomized 1:1 to receive PH or MPH. Bleeding assessments occurred intraoperatively using a novel bleeding assessment methodology. Primary endpoint was noninferiority as compared with control via effective hemostasis at 7 min. Patients were monitored and followed daily in the postoperative period until time of discharge and again at 6 weeks. Overall survival was assessed in oncology patients at 24 months. Safety of PH vs. MPH was determined by comparing relative incidence of adverse events.
Results UNASSIGNED
Across 19 centers, 324 (161 PH, 163 MPH) patients were randomized (48 % general surgery, 27 % cardiac surgery, and 25 % urologic surgery). PH was noninferior to MPH and met the primary endpoint of hemostatic success at 7 min at a non-inferiority margin of 10 %. No significant differences were found in adverse event rates. Six deaths were reported within the 6-week follow-up period. No difference in overall survival was observed at 2 years (76 % PH vs. 74 % MPH,
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Across three therapeutic areas, PH was noninferior to MPH at all hemostasis assessment time points with no safety concerns. PH is an effective alternative to MPH for hemostasis during surgery.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02359994.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38800121
doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.009
pii: S2589-8450(24)00061-7
pmc: PMC11127167
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02359994']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

205-211

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

As the study sponsor, CryoLife/Artivion provided financial support to conduct the study including project management, monitoring, data management, statistical analyses, and generation of the final study report for submission to the FDA. The authors have disclosed any conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Michael G House (MG)

Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.

Robin Kim (R)

University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.

Elaine E Tseng (EE)

San Francisco Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Francisco, CA.

Ronald P Kaufman (RP)

Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States of America.

Marc R Moon (MR)

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States of America.

Adam Yopp (A)

University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States of America.

Viraj A Master (VA)

Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Classifications MeSH