Comparison Between a Single-Lead ECG Garment Device and a Holter Monitor: A Signal Quality Assessment.
Electrocardiogram
Holter monitor
Signal quality
Wearable devices
Journal
Journal of medical systems
ISSN: 1573-689X
Titre abrégé: J Med Syst
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7806056
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 May 2024
27 May 2024
Historique:
received:
19
01
2024
accepted:
16
05
2024
medline:
27
5
2024
pubmed:
27
5
2024
entrez:
27
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Wearable electronics are increasingly common and useful as health monitoring devices, many of which feature the ability to record a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). However, recording the ECG commonly requires the user to touch the device to complete the lead circuit, which prevents continuous data acquisition. An alternative approach to enable continuous monitoring without user initiation is to embed the leads in a garment. This study assessed ECG data obtained from the YouCare device (a novel sensorized garment) via comparison with a conventional Holter monitor. A cohort of thirty patients (age range: 20-82 years; 16 females and 14 males) were enrolled and monitored for twenty-four hours with both the YouCare device and a Holter monitor. ECG data from both devices were qualitatively assessed by a panel of three expert cardiologists and quantitatively analyzed using specialized software. Patients also responded to a survey about the comfort of the YouCare device as compared to the Holter monitor. The YouCare device was assessed to have 70% of its ECG signals as "Good", 12% as "Acceptable", and 18% as "Not Readable". The R-wave, independently recorded by the YouCare device and Holter monitor, were synchronized within measurement error during 99.4% of cardiac cycles. In addition, patients found the YouCare device more comfortable than the Holter monitor (comfortable 22 vs. 5 and uncomfortable 1 vs. 18, respectively). Therefore, the quality of ECG data collected from the garment-based device was comparable to a Holter monitor when the signal was sufficiently acquired, and the garment was also comfortable.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38801649
doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02077-9
pii: 10.1007/s10916-024-02077-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
57Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Dagher, Lilas, Hanyuan Shi, Yan Zhao, and Nassir F. Marrouche. 2020. Wearables in cardiology: Here to stay. Heart Rhythm 17: 889–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.023 .
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.023
pubmed: 32354455
Gargiulo, Gaetano D., and Ganesh R. Naik, ed. 2022. Wearable/Personal Monitoring Devices Present to Future. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5324-7 .
Steinberg, Christian, François Philippon, Marina Sanchez, Pascal Fortier-Poisson, Gilles O’Hara, Franck Molin, Jean-François Sarrazin, et al. 2019. A Novel Wearable Device for Continuous Ambulatory ECG Recording: Proof of Concept and Assessment of Signal Quality. Biosensors 9. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios9010017 .
Cao, Rui, Iman Azimi, Fatemeh Sarhaddi, Hannakaisa Niela-Vilen, Anna Axelin, Pasi Liljeberg, and Amir M. Rahmani. 2022. Accuracy Assessment of Oura Ring Nocturnal Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability in Comparison With Electrocardiography in Time and Frequency Domains: Comprehensive Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 24: e27487. https://doi.org/10.2196/27487 .
doi: 10.2196/27487
pubmed: 35040799
pmcid: 8808342
Duncker, David, Wern Yew Ding, Susan Etheridge, Peter A. Noseworthy, Christian Veltmann, Xiaoxi Yao, T. Jared Bunch, and Dhiraj Gupta. 2021. Smart Wearables for Cardiac Monitoring-Real-World Use beyond Atrial Fibrillation. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 21: 2539. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072539 .
doi: 10.3390/s21072539
pubmed: 33916371
Huhn, Sophie, Miriam Axt, Hanns-Christian Gunga, Martina Anna Maggioni, Stephen Munga, David Obor, Ali Sié, et al. 2022. The Impact of Wearable Technologies in Health Research: Scoping Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 10: e34384. https://doi.org/10.2196/34384 .
doi: 10.2196/34384
pubmed: 35076409
pmcid: 8826148
Mannhart, Diego, Mirko Lischer, Sven Knecht, Jeanne du Fay de Lavallaz, Ivo Strebel, Teodor Serban, David Vögeli, et al. 2023. Clinical Validation of 5 Direct-to-Consumer Wearable Smart Devices to Detect Atrial Fibrillation: BASEL Wearable Study. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2022.09.011 .
Basza, Mikołaj, Bartosz Krzowski, Paweł Balsam, Marcin Grabowski, Grzegorz Opolski, and Lukasz Kołtowski. 2021. An Apple Watch a day keeps the doctor away? Cardiology Journal 28: 801–803. https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.2021.0140 .
doi: 10.5603/CJ.2021.0140
pubmed: 34985118
pmcid: 8747830
Taylor, John R. 2024. An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements, Second Edition. University Science Books. https://uscibooks.aip.org/books/introduction-to-error-analysis-2nd-ed/ . Accessed January 11.
Makowski, Dominique, Tam Pham, Zen J. Lau, Jan C. Brammer, François Lespinasse, Hung Pham, Christopher Schölzel, and S. H. Annabel Chen. 2021. NeuroKit2: A Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing. Behavior Research Methods 53: 1689–1696. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y .
Corazza, I., G. Barletta, P. Guaraldi, A. Cecere, G. Calandra-Buonaura, E. Altini, R. Zannoli, and P. Cortelli. 2014. A new integrated instrumental approach to autonomic nervous system assessment. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 117: 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.08.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.08.002
pubmed: 25168777
Nigusse, Abreha Bayrau, Desalegn Alemu Mengistie, Benny Malengier, Granch Berhe Tseghai, and Lieva Van Langenhove. 2021. Wearable Smart Textiles for Long-Term Electrocardiography Monitoring—A Review. Sensors 21. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: 4174. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21124174 .
Tsukada, Yayoi Tetsuou, Miwa Tokita, Hiroshige Murata, Yasuhiro Hirasawa, Kenji Yodogawa, Yu-ki Iwasaki, Kuniya Asai, et al. 2019. Validation of wearable textile electrodes for ECG monitoring. Heart and Vessels 34: 1203–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01347-8 .
doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01347-8
pubmed: 30680493
Neri, Luca, Matt T. Oberdier, Antonio Augello, Masahito Suzuki, Ethan Tumarkin, Sujai Jaipalli, Gian Angelo Geminiani, Henry R. Halperin, and Claudio Borghi. 2023. Algorithm for Mobile Platform-Based Real-Time QRS Detection. Sensors 23. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: 1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031625 .
Neri, Luca, Matt T. Oberdier, Kirsten C. J. van Abeelen, Luca Menghini, Ethan Tumarkin, Hemantkumar Tripathi, Sujai Jaipalli, et al. 2023. Electrocardiogram Monitoring Wearable Devices and Artificial-Intelligence-Enabled Diagnostic Capabilities: A Review. Sensors 23. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: 4805. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23104805 .