Postoperative venous thromboembolism risk in patients with vulvar carcinoma: An analysis of the National surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

Thromboprophylaxis VTE Vulvar cancer

Journal

Gynecologic oncology reports
ISSN: 2352-5789
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101652231

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 02 05 2024
accepted: 04 05 2024
medline: 28 5 2024
pubmed: 28 5 2024
entrez: 28 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Due to low incidence of vulvar cancer (VC), incidence and predictors for development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are poorly understood. We examined incidence and risk factors associated with VTE in patients undergoing surgery for VC. We included patients who underwent surgery for VC from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. VTE within the 30-day postoperative period was captured with Current Procedural Terminology codes. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without VTE. Univariable and multivariable-adjusted exact logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between risk factors and VTE. We identified 1414 patients undergoing procedures for VC from the NSQIP database. Overall, 11 (0.8 %) patients developed VTE. Univariable predictors of VTE included surgery type [compared with simple vulvectomy: radical vulvectomy only (OR = 7.97, 95 % CI = 1.44, infinity) and radical vulvectomy plus unilateral IFN (OR = 15.98, 95 % CI = 2.70, infinity)], unplanned readmission (OR = 11.56, 95 % CI = 2.74, 46.38), deep surgical site infection (OR = 16.05, 95 % CI = 1.59-85.50), and preoperative thrombocytosis (OR = 6.53, 95 % CI = 0.00, 34.86). In a multivariable-adjusted model, longer operative time (≥72 min OR = 11.33, 95 % CI = 1.58-499.03) and preoperative functional status [compared with complete independence: total dependence (OR = 53.88, 95 % CI = 0.85, infinity) and partial dependence (OR = 53.88, 95 % CI = 0.85, infinity)] were associated with VTE. In this cohort of patients with VC undergoing radical vulvectomy, VTE incidence was low. Surgery type, longer operative time, dependent functional status, and wound disruption were identified as risk factors. Our findings highlight opportunities for prophylactic intervention in certain patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38803657
doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101411
pii: S2352-5789(24)00090-0
pmc: PMC11128827
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101411

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Quinn Kistenfeger (Q)

The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, United States.

Ashley S Felix (AS)

Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

Caitlin E Meade (CE)

Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

Vincent Wagner (V)

The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States.

Kristin Bixel (K)

The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States.

Laura M Chambers (LM)

The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States.

Classifications MeSH