Physiochemical interaction between osmotic stress and a bacterial exometabolite promotes plant disease.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 May 2024
Historique:
received: 08 09 2023
accepted: 01 05 2024
medline: 29 5 2024
pubmed: 29 5 2024
entrez: 28 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Various microbes isolated from healthy plants are detrimental under laboratory conditions, indicating the existence of molecular mechanisms preventing disease in nature. Here, we demonstrated that application of sodium chloride (NaCl) in natural and gnotobiotic soil systems is sufficient to induce plant disease caused by an otherwise non-pathogenic root-derived Pseudomonas brassicacearum isolate (R401). Disease caused by combinatorial treatment of NaCl and R401 triggered extensive, root-specific transcriptional reprogramming that did not involve down-regulation of host innate immune genes, nor dampening of ROS-mediated immunity. Instead, we identified and structurally characterized the R401 lipopeptide brassicapeptin A as necessary and sufficient to promote disease on salt-treated plants. Brassicapeptin A production is salt-inducible, promotes root colonization and transitions R401 from being beneficial to being detrimental on salt-treated plants by disturbing host ion homeostasis, thereby bolstering susceptibility to osmolytes. We conclude that the interaction between a global change stressor and a single exometabolite from a member of the root microbiome promotes plant disease in complex soil systems.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38806462
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48517-5
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-48517-5
doi:

Substances chimiques

Sodium Chloride 451W47IQ8X
Lipopeptides 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

4438

Subventions

Organisme : EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council)
ID : MICRORULES

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Agler, M. T. et al. Microbial Hub Taxa Link Host and Abiotic Factors to Plant Microbiome Variation. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002352 (2016).
pubmed: 26788878 pmcid: 4720289 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002352
Bai, Y. et al. Functional overlap of the Arabidopsis leaf and root microbiota. Nature 528, 364 (2015).
pubmed: 26633631 doi: 10.1038/nature16192
Duran, P. et al. Microbial Interkingdom Interactions in Roots Promote Arabidopsis Survival. Cell 175, 973 (2018).
pubmed: 30388454 pmcid: 6218654 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.020
Thiergart, T. et al. Root microbiota assembly and adaptive differentiation among European Arabidopsis populations. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 122 (2020).
pubmed: 31900452 doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-1063-3
Karasov, T. L. et al. Arabidopsis thaliana and Pseudomonas Pathogens Exhibit Stable Associations over Evolutionary Timescales. Cell Host Microbe 24, 168 (2018).
pubmed: 30001519 pmcid: 6054916 doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.06.011
Ma, K. W. et al. Coordination of microbe-host homeostasis by crosstalk with plant innate immunity. Nat. Plants 7, 814 (2021).
pubmed: 34031541 pmcid: 8208891 doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00920-2
Pfeilmeier, S. et al. The plant NADPH oxidase RBOHD is required for microbiota homeostasis in leaves. Nat. Microbiol 6, 852 (2021).
pubmed: 34194036 pmcid: 7612668 doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00929-5
Shalev, O. et al. Commensal Pseudomonas strains facilitate protective response against pathogens in the host plant. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 383 (2022).
pubmed: 35210578 pmcid: 8986537 doi: 10.1038/s41559-022-01673-7
Pfeilmeier, S. et al. Leaf microbiome dysbiosis triggered by T2SS-dependent enzyme secretion from opportunistic Xanthomonas pathogens. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 136–149 (2024).
Entila, F., Han, X., Mine, A., Schulze-Lefert, P. & Tsuda, K. Commensal lifestyle regulated by a negative feedback loop between Arabidopsis ROS and the bacterial T2SS. Nat. Commun. 15, 456 (2024).
Stevens R. B. in: Plant Pathology, an Advanced Treatise, Vol. 3. J. G. Horsfall and A. E. Dimond, eds. Academic Press, NY., 357-429 (1960).
Cheng, Y. T., Zhang, L. & He, S. Y. Plant-Microbe Interactions Facing Environmental Challenge. Cell Host Microbe 26, 183–192 (2019).
pubmed: 31415751 pmcid: 6697056 doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.07.009
Arnault, G., Mony, C. & Vandenkoornhuyse, P. Plant microbiota dysbiosis and the Anna Karenina Principle. Trends Plant Sci. 28, 18–30 (2023).
pubmed: 36127241 doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2022.08.012
Mesny, F., Hacquard, S. & Thomma, B. P. Co-evolution within the plant holobiont drives host performance. Embo Rep. 24, e57455 (2023).
pubmed: 37471099 pmcid: 10481671 doi: 10.15252/embr.202357455
Hua, D. P. et al. A Plasma Membrane Receptor Kinase, GHR1, Mediates Abscisic Acid- and Hydrogen Peroxide-Regulated Stomatal Movement in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 2546–2561 (2012).
pubmed: 22730405 pmcid: 3406912 doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.100107
Zhang, Y. Y. et al. Phospholipase D alpha 1 and Phosphatidic Acid Regulate NADPH Oxidase Activity and Production of Reactive Oxygen Species in ABA-Mediated Stomatal Closure in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 2357–2377 (2009).
pubmed: 19690149 pmcid: 2751945 doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.062992
Zhu, J. K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 247–273 (2002).
pubmed: 12221975 pmcid: 3128348 doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329
Zhu, J. K. Abiotic Stress Signaling and Responses in Plants. Cell 167, 313–324 (2016).
pubmed: 27716505 pmcid: 5104190 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029
Pieterse, C. M. J., Van der Does, D., Zamioudis, C., Leon-Reyes, A. & Van Wees, S. C. M. Hormonal Modulation of Plant Immunity. Annu Rev. Cell Dev. Bi 28, 489–521 (2012).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154055
Yasuda, M. et al. Antagonistic interaction between systemic acquired resistance and the abscisic acid-mediated abiotic stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20, 1678–1692 (2008).
pubmed: 18586869 pmcid: 2483369 doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.054296
Berens, M. L. et al. Balancing trade-offs between biotic and abiotic stress responses through leaf age-dependent variation in stress hormone cross-talk. P Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2364–2373 (2019).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817233116
Fan, J., Hill, L., Crooks, C., Doerner, P. & Lamb, C. Abscisic Acid Has a Key Role in Modulating Diverse Plant-Pathogen Interactions. Plant Physiol. 150, 1750–1761 (2009).
pubmed: 19571312 pmcid: 2719142 doi: 10.1104/pp.109.137943
Jiang, C. J. et al. Abscisic Acid Interacts Antagonistically with Salicylic Acid Signaling Pathway in Rice-Magnaporthe grisea Interaction. Mol. Plant Microbe 23, 791–798 (2010).
doi: 10.1094/MPMI-23-6-0791
Getzke, F. et al. Cofunctioning of bacterial exometabolites drives root microbiota establishment. P Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2221508120 (2023).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2221508120
Feil, H. et al. Comparison of the complete genome sequences of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a and pv. tomato DC3000. P Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11064–11069 (2005).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504930102
Kremer, J. M. et al. Peat-based gnotobiotic plant growth systems for Arabidopsis microbiome research. Nat. Protoc. 16, 2450–2470 (2021).
pubmed: 33911260 pmcid: 10354810 doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00504-6
Dimartino, M. et al. Occurrence and Pathogenicity of Pseudomonas Fluorescens and P. Putida on Tomato Plants in Italy. J. Plant Pathol. 93, 79–87 (2011).
Chojak-Kozniewska, J., Linkiewicz, A., Sowa, S., Radzioch, M. A. & Kuzniak, E. Interactive effects of salt stress and Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans infection in cucumber: Involvement of antioxidant enzymes, abscisic acid and salicylic acid. Environ. Exp. Bot. 136, 9–20 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.01.004
Mi, H. Y., Muruganujan, A., Casagrande, J. T. & Thomas, P. D. Large-scale gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1551–1566 (2013).
pubmed: 23868073 pmcid: 6519453 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.092
Mi, H. Y., Muruganujan, A., Ebert, D., Huang, X. S. & Thomas, P. D. PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 47, D419–D426 (2019).
pubmed: 30407594 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1038
Carbon, S. et al. Expansion of the Gene Ontology knowledgebase and resources. Nucleic Acids Res 45, D331–D338 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1108
Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J. & Pinheiro, C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann. Bot.-Lond. 103, 551–560 (2009).
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn125
Eynard, A., Lal, R. & Wiebe, K. Crop response in salt-affected soils. J. Sustain Agr. 27, 5–50 (2005).
doi: 10.1300/J064v27n01_03
Geng, Y. et al. A Spatio-Temporal Understanding of Growth Regulation during the Salt Stress Response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25, 2132–2154 (2013).
pubmed: 23898029 pmcid: 3723617 doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.112896
Hanin, M., Ebel, C., Ngom, M., Laplaze, L. & Masmoudi, K. New Insights on Plant Salt Tolerance Mechanisms and Their Potential Use for Breeding. Front Plant Sci. 7, 1787 (2016).
pubmed: 27965692 pmcid: 5126725 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01787
Zhou, Y. Y. et al. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat. Commun. 10, 1523 (2019).
pubmed: 30944313 pmcid: 6447622 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6
Cunnac, S., Lindeberg, M. & Collmer, A. Pseudomonas syringae type III secretion system effectors: repertoires in search of functions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 12, 53–60 (2009).
pubmed: 19168384 doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.12.003
Guo, M., Tian, F., Wamboldt, Y. & Alfano, J. R. The Majority of the Type III Effector Inventory of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 Can Suppress Plant Immunity. Mol. Plant Microbe 22, 1069–1080 (2009).
doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-9-1069
Wagner, S. et al. Bacterial type III secretion systems: a complex device for the delivery of bacterial effector proteins into eukaryotic host cells. Fems Microbiol Lett. 365, fny201 (2018).
pubmed: 30107569 pmcid: 6140923 doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny201
Blin, K. et al. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 49, W29–W35 (2021).
pubmed: 33978755 pmcid: 8262755 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab335
Scholz-Schroeder, B. K., Hutchison, M. L., Grgurina, I. & Gross, D. C. The contribution of syringopeptin and syringomycin to virulence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae strain B301D on the basis of sypA and syrB1 biosynthesis mutant analysis. Mol. Plant Microbe 14, 336–348 (2001).
doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.3.336
Hou, S. et al. A microbiota-root-shoot circuit favours Arabidopsis growth over defence under suboptimal light. Nat. Plants 7, 1078 (2021).
pubmed: 34226690 pmcid: 8367822 doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00956-4
Ku, H. M., Vision, T., Liu, J. P. & Tanksley, S. D. Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: Large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. P Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9121–9126 (2000).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.160271297
Grgurina, I. et al. A new syringopeptin produced by bean strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. Bba-Protein Struct. M 1597, 81–89 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S0167-4838(02)00283-2
Grgurina, I. et al. Novel cyclic lipodepsipeptide from Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans strain 508 and syringopeptin antimicrobial activities. Antimicrob. Agents Ch 49, 5037–5045 (2005).
doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.12.5037-5045.2005
Isogai, A. et al. Structural-Analysis of New Syringopeptins by Tandem Mass-Spectrometry. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch 59, 1374–1376 (1995).
doi: 10.1271/bbb.59.1374
Huang, C. J. et al. Characterization of Cichopeptins, New Phytotoxic Cyclic Lipodepsipeptides Produced by Pseudomonas cichorii SF1-54 and Their Role in Bacterial Midrib Rot Disease of Lettuce. Mol. Plant Microbe 28, 1009–1022 (2015).
doi: 10.1094/MPMI-03-15-0061-R
Emanuele, M. C. et al. Corpeptins, new bioactive lipodepsipeptides from cultures of. Febs Lett. 433, 317–320 (1998).
pubmed: 9744818 doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00933-8
Saur, I. M. L., Bauer, S., Lu, X. L. & Schulze-Lefert, P. A cell death assay in barley and wheat protoplasts for identification and validation of matching pathogen AVR effector and plant NLR immune receptors. Plant Methods 15, 118 (2019).
pubmed: 31666804 pmcid: 6813131 doi: 10.1186/s13007-019-0502-0
Bender, C. L., Alarcon-Chaidez, F. & Gross, D. C. Pseudomonas syringae phytotoxins: Mode of action, regulation, and biosynthesis by peptide and polyketide synthetases. Microbiol Mol. Biol. R. 63, 266 (1999).
doi: 10.1128/MMBR.63.2.266-292.1999
Carpaneto, A., Dalla Serra, M., Menestrina, G., Fogliano, V. & Gambale, F. The phytotoxic lipodepsipeptide syringopeptin 25A from Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae forms ion channels in sugar beet vacuoles. J. Membr. Biol. 188, 237–248 (2002).
pubmed: 12181614 doi: 10.1007/s00232-001-0187-x
Agner, G. et al. Membrane-permeabilizing activities of cyclic lipodepsipeptides, syringopeptin 22A and syringomycin E from Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae in human red blood cells and in bilayer lipid membranes. Bioelectrochemistry 52, 161–167 (2000).
pubmed: 11129239 doi: 10.1016/S0302-4598(00)00098-2
Geudens, N. & Martins, J. C. Cyclic Lipodepsipeptides From Pseudomonas spp. - Biological Swiss-Army Knives. Front Microbiol 9, 1867 (2018).
pubmed: 30158910 pmcid: 6104475 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01867
Mesny, F. et al. Genetic determinants of endophytism in the root mycobiome. Nat. Commun. 12, 7227 (2021).
pubmed: 34893598 pmcid: 8664821 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27479-y
Wippel, K. et al. Host preference and invasiveness of commensal bacteria in the Lotus and Arabidopsis root microbiota. Nat. Microbiol 6, 1150 (2021).
pubmed: 34312531 pmcid: 8387241 doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00941-9
Levy, A. et al. Genomic features of bacterial adaptation to plants. Nat. Genet 50, 138 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41588-017-0012-9
Acosta-Motos, J. R. et al. Plant Responses to Salt Stress: Adaptive Mechanisms. Agronomy-Basel 7, 18 (2017).
Ashraf, M. & Harris, P. J. C. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci. 166, 3–16 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.024
Dalla Serra, M. et al. The interaction of lipodepsipeptide toxins from Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae with biological and model membranes: A comparison of syringotoxin, syringomycin, and two syringopeptins. Mol. Plant Microbe 12, 391–400 (1999).
doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.5.391
Hutchison, M. L. & Gross, D. C. Lipopeptide phytotoxins produced by Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae: Comparison of the biosurfactant and ion channel-forming activities of syringopeptin and syringomycin. Mol. Plant Microbe 10, 347–354 (1997).
doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1997.10.3.347
Melnyk, R. A., Hossain, S. S. & Haney, C. H. Convergent gain and loss of genomic islands drive lifestyle changes in plant-associated Pseudomonas. Isme J. 13, 1575–1588 (2019).
pubmed: 30787396 pmcid: 6776051 doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0372-5
Song, Y. et al. FERONIA restricts Pseudomonas in the rhizosphere microbiome via regulation of reactive oxygen species. Nat. Plants 7, 644 (2021).
pubmed: 33972713 doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00914-0
Corwin, D. L. Climate change impacts on soil salinity in agricultural areas. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 72, 842–862 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/ejss.13010
Eswar, D., Karuppusamy, R. & Chellamuthu, S. Drivers of soil salinity and their correlation with climate change. Curr. Opin. Env Sust. 50, 310–318 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.10.015
Mukhopadhyay, R., Sarkar, B., Jat, H. S., Sharma, P. C. & Bolan, N. S. Soil salinity under climate change: Challenges for sustainable agriculture and food security. J. Environ. Manag. 280, 111736 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111736
Bionda, N., Pitteloud, J. P. & Cudic, P. Cyclic lipodepsipeptides: a new class of antibacterial agents in the battle against resistant bacteria. Future Med Chem. 5, 1311–1330 (2013).
pubmed: 23859209 doi: 10.4155/fmc.13.86
Kuiper, I. et al. Characterization of two Pseudomonas putida lipopeptide biosurfactants, putisolvin I and II, which inhibit biofilm formation and break down existing biofilms. Mol. Microbiol 51, 97–113 (2004).
pubmed: 14651614 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03751.x
Neu, T. R., Hartner, T. & Poralla, K. Surface-Active Properties of Viscosin - a Peptidolipid Antibiotic. Appl Microbiol Biot. 32, 518–520 (1990).
doi: 10.1007/BF00173720
Peypoux, F., Bonmatin, J. M. & Wallach, J. Recent trends in the biochemistry of surfactin. Appl Microbiol Biot. 51, 553–563 (1999).
doi: 10.1007/s002530051432
Raaijmakers, J. M., de Bruijn, I., Nybroe, O. & Ongena, M. Natural functions of lipopeptides from Bacillus and Pseudomonas: more than surfactants and antibiotics. Fems Microbiol Rev. 34, 1037–1062 (2010).
pubmed: 20412310 doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00221.x
Torres, M. A., Dangl, J. L. & Jones, J. D. G. Arabidopsis gp91(phox) homologues AtrbohD and AtrbohF are required for accumulation of reactive oxygen intermediates in the plant defense response. P Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 517–522 (2002).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.012452499
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
pubmed: 24695404 pmcid: 4103590 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907 (2019).
pubmed: 31375807 pmcid: 7605509 doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).
pubmed: 24227677 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
pubmed: 25516281 pmcid: 4302049 doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
Zhu, A. Q., Ibrahim, J. G. & Love, M. I. Heavy-tailed prior distributions for sequence count data: removing the noise and preserving large differences. Bioinformatics 35, 2084–2092 (2019).
pubmed: 30395178 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty895
Vannier, N. et al. Genome-resolved metatranscriptomics reveals conserved root colonization determinants in a synthetic microbiota. Nat. Commun. 14, 8274 (2023).
pubmed: 38092730 pmcid: 10719396 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43688-z
Gibson, D. G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 6, 343–U341 (2009).
pubmed: 19363495 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318
Kvitko, B. H. & Collmer, A. Construction of pv. tomato DC3000 Mutant and Polymutant Strains. Methods Mol. Biol. 712, 109–128 (2011).
pubmed: 21359804 doi: 10.1007/978-1-61737-998-7_10
Wang, L. et al. Discovery and Biosynthesis of Antimicrobial Phenethylamine Alkaloids from the Marine Flavobacterium Tenacibaculum discolor sv11. J. Nat. Prod. 85, 1039–1051 (2022).
pubmed: 35416664 doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c01173

Auteurs

Felix Getzke (F)

Department of Plant Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829, Cologne, Germany.

Lei Wang (L)

Institute for Insect Biotechnology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392, Giessen, Germany.

Guillaume Chesneau (G)

Department of Plant Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829, Cologne, Germany.

Nils Böhringer (N)

Institute for Insect Biotechnology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Giessen-Marburg-Langen, 35392, Giessen, Germany.

Fantin Mesny (F)

Department of Plant Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829, Cologne, Germany.
Institute for Plant Sciences, University of Cologne, 50674, Cologne, Germany.

Nienke Denissen (N)

Department of Plant Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829, Cologne, Germany.

Hidde Wesseler (H)

Department of Plant Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829, Cologne, Germany.

Priscilla Tijesuni Adisa (PT)

Department of Plant Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829, Cologne, Germany.

Michael Marner (M)

Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (IME), Branch for Bioresources, 35392, Giessen, Germany.

Paul Schulze-Lefert (P)

Department of Plant Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829, Cologne, Germany.
Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829, Cologne, Germany.

Till F Schäberle (TF)

Institute for Insect Biotechnology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392, Giessen, Germany. Till.F.Schaeberle@agrar.uni-giessen.de.
German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Giessen-Marburg-Langen, 35392, Giessen, Germany. Till.F.Schaeberle@agrar.uni-giessen.de.
Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (IME), Branch for Bioresources, 35392, Giessen, Germany. Till.F.Schaeberle@agrar.uni-giessen.de.

Stéphane Hacquard (S)

Department of Plant Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829, Cologne, Germany. hacquard@mpipz.mpg.de.
Cluster of Excellence on Plant Sciences (CEPLAS), Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829, Cologne, Germany. hacquard@mpipz.mpg.de.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Genome, Viral Ralstonia Composting Solanum lycopersicum Bacteriophages
Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Proteins Osmotic Pressure Cytoplasm RNA, Messenger
Capsicum Disease Resistance Plant Diseases Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide Ralstonia solanacearum

Classifications MeSH