Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy associated with IgA nephropathy: a case report and literature review.
AKI (acute kidney injury)
IgA nephropathy
IgAN
glomerulonephritis
immune check inhibitor (ICI)
immune-related adverse events (IRAE)
pembrolizumab
Journal
Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
29
02
2024
accepted:
23
04
2024
medline:
29
5
2024
pubmed:
29
5
2024
entrez:
29
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) dramatically improve the prognosis of many malignancies but at the cost of numerous side effects, which may limit their benefits. Acute kidney injury associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors most frequently are acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN), but various cases of glomerulonephritis have also been reported. Herein, we report a case of severe IgA nephropathy (IgAN) associated with ICIs and carry out a literature review. IgAN was diagnosed in a median time of 5 months (range 1-12 months) after the initiation of ICIs, with heterogeneous severity, and usually treated by corticosteroid and discontinuation of ICIs. In contrast to our case, renal outcomes in literature were often favorable, with recovery of renal function and a reduction in proteinuria on treatment. Although IgAN related to ICIs is a much rarer complication than ATIN, it may still be underdiagnosed. Careful questioning and screening for asymptomatic hematuria should be performed before using ICIs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38807591
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1393901
pmc: PMC11130422
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Case Reports
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1393901Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Chabannes, Lisri, Lang, Seibel, Eberst, Ducloux, Pursun, Durey, Alyanakia, Felix and Crepin.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.