Immunohistochemistry analysis of PSMA expression at prostatic biopsy in high-risk prostate cancer: potential implications for PSMA-PET patient selection.

PSMA PET biopsy immunohistochemistry prostate cancer radical prostatectomy

Journal

Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 19 10 2023
accepted: 18 04 2024
medline: 29 5 2024
pubmed: 29 5 2024
entrez: 29 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane protein expressed by normal prostatic tissue. Therefore, molecular imaging targeting PSMA (PSMA-PET) has gained particular interest and diffusion for PCa staging and restaging. Several factors may affect PSMA-PET results, and many tools have been proposed to improve patient selection. Furthermore, PSMA expression is not homogeneous among different tissues and within the prostate itself. The aims of this study were to evaluate immunohistochemistry (IHC) features of prostate biopsy samples and to assess their correlation with whole-mount specimens and PSMA-PET parameters. We included consecutive high-risk PCa patients who underwent PSMA-PET for staging proposal at our institution from January 2022 to December 2022. The PET parameters selected were SUVmax, total volume (TV), and total lesion activity (TL). Each patient underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and fusion-targeted prostate biopsy prior to surgery. IHC analyses were performed on the index lesion cores. IHC visual score (VS) (1, 2, 3) and visual pattern (VP) (membranous, cytoplasmic, and combined) and the percentage of PSMA-negative tumor areas (PSMA%neg) within biopsy cores were evaluated. Forty-three patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy after PSMA-PET were available for analyses. Concordance between VS and VP at biopsy and final pathology showed a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.39 and 0.38, respectively. Patients with PSMA%neg <20% had a higher concordance in VS and VP (Cohen's kappa 0.49 and 0.4, respectively). No difference emerged in terms of median PSMA-TV ( We found a correlation between IHC VS and VP on targeted biopsy cores and SUVmax at PSMA-PET. However, the correlation between the IHC parameters of biopsy cores and final pathology was not as high as expected. Nevertheless, the presence of PSMA%neg <20% seems to have a better concordance in terms of visual score.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38807770
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1324631
pmc: PMC11130476
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1324631

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Droghetti, Bianchi, Presutti, Vetrone, Farolfi, Mei, Giunchi, Degiovanni, Mottaran, Piazza, Cangemi, Castellucci, D’Errico, Schiavina, Brunocilla and Fanti.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Auteurs

Matteo Droghetti (M)

Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Lorenzo Bianchi (L)

Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Massimiliano Presutti (M)

Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Luigia Vetrone (L)

Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Andrea Farolfi (A)

Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Riccardo Mei (R)

Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Francesca Giunchi (F)

Pathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Alessio Degiovanni (A)

Pathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Angelo Mottaran (A)

Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Pietro Piazza (P)

Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Danilo Cangemi (D)

Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Paolo Castellucci (P)

Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Antonietta D'Errico (A)

Pathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Riccardo Schiavina (R)

Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Eugenio Brunocilla (E)

Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Stefano Fanti (S)

Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Classifications MeSH