Arrhythmia monitoring and outcome after myocardial infarction (BIO|GUARD-MI): a randomized trial.
cardiac arrhythmia
implantable cardiac monitor
myocardial infarction
randomized controlled trial
telemedicine
Journal
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 2297-055X
Titre abrégé: Front Cardiovasc Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101653388
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
23
09
2023
accepted:
16
04
2024
medline:
29
5
2024
pubmed:
29
5
2024
entrez:
29
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cardiac arrhythmias predict poor outcome after myocardial infarction (MI). We studied if arrhythmia monitoring with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) can improve treatment and outcome. BIO|GUARD-MI was a randomized, international open-label study with blinded outcome assessment. Tertiary care facilities monitored the arrhythmias, while the follow-up remained with primary care physicians. Patients after ST-elevation (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation MI with an ejection fraction >35% and a CHA Patients were randomly assigned to receive or not receive an ICM in addition to standard post-MI treatment. Device-detected arrhythmias triggered immediate guideline recommended therapy changes via remote monitoring. MACE, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death or acute unscheduled hospitalization for cardiovascular causes. 790 patients (mean age 71 years, 72% male, 51% non-STEMI) of planned 1,400 pts were enrolled and followed for a median of 31.6 months. At 2 years, 39.4% of the device group and 6.7% of the control group had their therapy adapted for an arrhythmia [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.9, The burden of asymptomatic but actionable arrhythmias is large in post-infarction patients. However, arrhythmia monitoring with an ICM did not improve outcome in the entire cohort. Post-hoc analysis suggests that it may be beneficial in non-STEMI patients or other high-risk subgroups. [https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02341534], NCT02341534.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38807948
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1300074
pmc: PMC11132184
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02341534']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1300074Informations de copyright
© 2024 Jøns, Bloch Thomsen, Riahi, Smilde, Bach, Jacobsen, Táborský, Faluközy, Wiemer, Christensen, Kónyi, Schelfaut, Bulava, Grabowski, Merkely, Nuyens, Mahajan, Nagel, Tilz, Malczynski, Steinwender, Brachmann, Serota, Schrader, Behrens and Søgaard.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
UB has received lecture fees from Boehringer, Astra Zeneca and Bayer, and travel costs from Boehringer, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, and Bristol Myers Squibb. MG reports consulting and lecture fees from Abbott Medical, Biotronik, Boston Sc. and Medtronic. BM reports grant or contract payments from Medtronic and Boston Scientific and lecture fees from Biotronik and Abbott Medical. RM reports grant or contract payments from Abbott Medical, Medtronic, Bayer and lecture fees from Bayer. RT reports consulting fees from Abbott and Boston Sc. and honoraria for lectures from Abbott Medical, Biotronik and Boston Sc. JS is an employee of Biotronik. SB reports lecture fees and travel costs from Biotronik in the context of this study, and lecture fees from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis, and DSMB or advisory board membership fees from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis. The authors declare that this study received funding from Biotronik SE & Co. KG. The funder supported study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data and the writing of this article.