Adjuvant Everolimus in Patients with Completely Resected, Very High-risk Renal Cell Carcinoma of Clear Cell Histology: Results from the Phase 3 Placebo-controlled SWOG S0931 (EVEREST) Trial.

Adjuvant Everolimus High risk Kidney cancer

Journal

European urology
ISSN: 1873-7560
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 7512719

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 May 2024
Historique:
received: 16 01 2024
revised: 26 04 2024
accepted: 03 05 2024
medline: 30 5 2024
pubmed: 30 5 2024
entrez: 29 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

EVEREST is a phase 3 trial in patients with renal cell cancer (RCC) at intermediate-high or very high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy who were randomized to receive adjuvant everolimus or placebo. Longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) was observed with everolimus (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.00; p = 0.051), but the nominal significance level (p = 0.044) was not reached. To contextualize these results with positive phase 3 trials of adjuvant sunitinib and pembrolizumab, we conducted a secondary analysis in a similar population of EVEREST patients with very high-risk disease and clear cell histology. Postnephrectomy patients with any clear cell component and very high-risk disease, defined as pT3a (grade 3-4), pT3b-c (any grade), T4 (any grade), or node-positive status (N+), were identified. A Cox regression model stratified by performance status was used to compare RFS and overall survival (OS) between the treatment arms. Of 1499 patients, 717 had clear cell histology and very high-risk disease; 699 met the eligibility criteria, of whom 348 were randomized to everolimus arm, and 351 to the placebo arm. Patient characteristics were similar between the arms. Only 163/348 (47%) patients in the everolimus arm completed all treatment as planned, versus 225/351 (64%) in the placebo arm. Adjuvant everolimus resulted in a statistically significant improvement in RFS (HR 0.80; 95%CI 0.65-0.99, p = 0.041). Evidence of a survival benefit was not seen (HR 0.85; 95%CI 0.64-1.14, p = 0.3) CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In patients with clear cell RCC at very high-risk for recurrence, adjuvant everolimus resulted in significantly improved RFS compared to placebo but resulted in a high discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Although the treatment HR for OS was consistent with RFS findings, it did not reach statistical significance. With a focus on risk stratification tools and/or biomarkers to minimize toxicity risk in those not likely to benefit, this information can help inform the design of future adjuvant trials in high-risk RCC PATIENT SUMMARY: We assessed treatment with everolimus in comparison to placebo after complete surgical removal of clear-cell kidney cancer at very high risk of recurrence. We found that survival outcomes were better for patients treated with everolimus, although these patients had a higher rate of side effects.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
EVEREST is a phase 3 trial in patients with renal cell cancer (RCC) at intermediate-high or very high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy who were randomized to receive adjuvant everolimus or placebo. Longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) was observed with everolimus (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.00; p = 0.051), but the nominal significance level (p = 0.044) was not reached. To contextualize these results with positive phase 3 trials of adjuvant sunitinib and pembrolizumab, we conducted a secondary analysis in a similar population of EVEREST patients with very high-risk disease and clear cell histology.
METHODS METHODS
Postnephrectomy patients with any clear cell component and very high-risk disease, defined as pT3a (grade 3-4), pT3b-c (any grade), T4 (any grade), or node-positive status (N+), were identified. A Cox regression model stratified by performance status was used to compare RFS and overall survival (OS) between the treatment arms.
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS UNASSIGNED
Of 1499 patients, 717 had clear cell histology and very high-risk disease; 699 met the eligibility criteria, of whom 348 were randomized to everolimus arm, and 351 to the placebo arm. Patient characteristics were similar between the arms. Only 163/348 (47%) patients in the everolimus arm completed all treatment as planned, versus 225/351 (64%) in the placebo arm. Adjuvant everolimus resulted in a statistically significant improvement in RFS (HR 0.80; 95%CI 0.65-0.99, p = 0.041). Evidence of a survival benefit was not seen (HR 0.85; 95%CI 0.64-1.14, p = 0.3) CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In patients with clear cell RCC at very high-risk for recurrence, adjuvant everolimus resulted in significantly improved RFS compared to placebo but resulted in a high discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Although the treatment HR for OS was consistent with RFS findings, it did not reach statistical significance. With a focus on risk stratification tools and/or biomarkers to minimize toxicity risk in those not likely to benefit, this information can help inform the design of future adjuvant trials in high-risk RCC PATIENT SUMMARY: We assessed treatment with everolimus in comparison to placebo after complete surgical removal of clear-cell kidney cancer at very high risk of recurrence. We found that survival outcomes were better for patients treated with everolimus, although these patients had a higher rate of side effects.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38811313
pii: S0302-2838(24)02383-2
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.05.012
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Primo N Lara (PN)

University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA. Electronic address: pnlara@ucdavis.edu.

Catherine Tangen (C)

SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Elisabeth I Heath (EI)

Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.

Shuchi Gulati (S)

University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Mark N Stein (MN)

Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Maxwell Meng (M)

UC San Francisco Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Ajjai Shivaram Alva (AS)

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Sumanta K Pal (SK)

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.

Igor Puzanov (I)

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Joseph I Clark (JI)

Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Toni K Choueiri (TK)

Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Neeraj Agarwal (N)

Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Robert Uzzo (R)

Fox Chase Comprehensive Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Naomi B Haas (NB)

Abramson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Timothy W Synold (TW)

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.

Melissa Plets (M)

SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Ulka N Vaishampayan (UN)

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Brian M Shuch (BM)

UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Seth Lerner (S)

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Ian M Thompson (IM)

Christus Santa Rosa Health System San Antonio, TX Health, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Christopher W Ryan (CW)

Oregon Health and Science University, Portland OR, USA.

Classifications MeSH