The implementation of person-centred plans in the community-care sector: a qualitative study of organizations in Ontario, Canada.
Community-based care
Disability
Health services
Integrated care
Organizational culture
Person-centred planning
Qualitative study
Social services
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 May 2024
29 May 2024
Historique:
received:
14
02
2024
accepted:
08
05
2024
medline:
30
5
2024
pubmed:
30
5
2024
entrez:
29
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Person-centred planning refers to a model of care in which programs and services are developed in collaboration with persons receiving care (i.e., persons-supported) and tailored to their unique needs and goals. In recent decades, governments around the world have enacted policies requiring community-care agencies to adopt an individualized or person-centred approach to service delivery. Although regional mandates provide a framework for directing care, it is unclear how this guidance is implemented in practice given the diversity and range of organizations within the sector. This study aims to address a gap in the literature by describing how person-centred care plans are implemented in community-care organizations. We conducted semi-structured interviews with administrators from community-care organizations in Ontario, Canada. We asked participants about their organization's approach to developing and updating person-centred care plans, including relevant supports and barriers. We analyzed the data thematically using a pragmatic, qualitative, descriptive approach. We interviewed administrators from 12 community-care organizations. We identified three overarching categories or processes related to organizational characteristics and person-centred planning: (1) organizational context, (2) organizational culture, and (3) the design and delivery of person-centred care plans. The context of care and the types of services offered by the organization were directly informed by the needs and characteristics of the population served. The culture of the organization (e.g., their values, attitudes and beliefs surrounding persons-supported) was a key influence in the development and implementation of person-centred care plans. Participants described the person-centred planning process as being iterative and collaborative, involving initial and continued consultations with persons-supported and their close family and friends, while also citing implementation challenges in cases where persons had difficulty communicating, and in cases where they preferred not to have a formal plan in place. The person-centred planning process is largely informed by organizational context and culture. There are ongoing challenges in the implementation of person-centred care plans, highlighting a gap between policy and practice and suggesting a need for comprehensive guidance and enhanced adaptability in current regulations. Policymakers, administrators, and service providers can leverage these insights to refine policies, advocating for inclusive, flexible approaches that better align with diverse community needs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Person-centred planning refers to a model of care in which programs and services are developed in collaboration with persons receiving care (i.e., persons-supported) and tailored to their unique needs and goals. In recent decades, governments around the world have enacted policies requiring community-care agencies to adopt an individualized or person-centred approach to service delivery. Although regional mandates provide a framework for directing care, it is unclear how this guidance is implemented in practice given the diversity and range of organizations within the sector. This study aims to address a gap in the literature by describing how person-centred care plans are implemented in community-care organizations.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted semi-structured interviews with administrators from community-care organizations in Ontario, Canada. We asked participants about their organization's approach to developing and updating person-centred care plans, including relevant supports and barriers. We analyzed the data thematically using a pragmatic, qualitative, descriptive approach.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We interviewed administrators from 12 community-care organizations. We identified three overarching categories or processes related to organizational characteristics and person-centred planning: (1) organizational context, (2) organizational culture, and (3) the design and delivery of person-centred care plans. The context of care and the types of services offered by the organization were directly informed by the needs and characteristics of the population served. The culture of the organization (e.g., their values, attitudes and beliefs surrounding persons-supported) was a key influence in the development and implementation of person-centred care plans. Participants described the person-centred planning process as being iterative and collaborative, involving initial and continued consultations with persons-supported and their close family and friends, while also citing implementation challenges in cases where persons had difficulty communicating, and in cases where they preferred not to have a formal plan in place.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The person-centred planning process is largely informed by organizational context and culture. There are ongoing challenges in the implementation of person-centred care plans, highlighting a gap between policy and practice and suggesting a need for comprehensive guidance and enhanced adaptability in current regulations. Policymakers, administrators, and service providers can leverage these insights to refine policies, advocating for inclusive, flexible approaches that better align with diverse community needs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38811995
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11089-7
pii: 10.1186/s12913-024-11089-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
680Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : QAE180992
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : QAE180992
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : QAE180992
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : QAE180992
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : QAE180992
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : QAE180992
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Purbhoo D, Wojtak A. Patient and family-centred home and community care: realizing the opportunity. Nurs Leadersh Tor Ont. 2018;31(2):40–51.
doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2018.25604
pubmed: 30339124
Lin E, Balogh RS, Durbin A, Holder L, Gupta N, Volpe T et al. Addressing gaps in the health care services used by adults with developmental disabilities in Ontario. ICES. 2019 [cited 2023 Aug 30]. https://www.ices.on.ca/publications/research-reports/addressing-gaps-in-the-health-care-services-used-by-adults-with-developmental-disabilities-in-ontario/
American Psychological Association. APA Guidelines for Assessment and Intervention with Persons with Disabilities: (502822022-001). 2022 [cited 2023 Aug 30]; http://doi.apa.org/get-pe-doi.cfm?doi=10.1037/e502822022-001
Dunn DS, Andrews EE. Person-first and identity-first language: developing psychologists’ cultural competence using disability language. Am Psychol. 2015;70(3):255–64.
doi: 10.1037/a0038636
pubmed: 25642702
Burke C. Building a stronger system for people with developmental disabilities: a six-month progress report from Commissioner Courtney Burke. New York Office for People with Developmental Disabilities; 2011. https://opwdd.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2019/12/6_month_progress_report_0.pdf
Government of Manitoba. Agency service coordination manual: 5.1 person-centred planning. 2021. https://www.gov.mb.ca/fs/clds/asc-manual/pubs/5.1-person-centred-planning.pdf
Government of Ontario. Services and supports to promote the social inclusion of Persons with Developmental Disabilities Act, 2008. 2008 [cited 2023 Aug 30]. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/100299#:~:text=O.-,Reg.,and other relevant clinical assessments
State of Michigan. Person Centered Planning.pdf. 2018.
O’Brien CL, O’Brien J. The origins of person-centered planning: a community of practice perspective.
Sanderson H. Person Centred Planning. York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2000.
Government of Ontario. Ontario.ca. 2019 [cited 2023 Sep 4]. Connecting Care Act, 2019: Home and Community Care Services. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/220187#BK17
Dong M. Examining individualized participatory approaches to care for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. University of Western Ontario; 2023. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/9517
Doyle L, McCabe C, Keogh B, Brady A, McCann M. An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. J Res Nurs. 2020;25(5):443–55.
doi: 10.1177/1744987119880234
pubmed: 34394658
Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE; 2014. p. 305.
Berg BL. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences: 2nd ed. Bostan, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1995. p. 421.
Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied Thematic Analysis. SAGE; 2012. p. 321.
Yin RK. Case study research design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2014. p. 282.
Helen Sanderson Associates. Helen Sanderson Associates. [cited 2023 Oct 31]. Sorting important to/for. http://helensandersonassociates.co.uk/person-centred-practice/person-centred-thinking-tools/sorting-important-tofor/
Hughes CA. The benefits and barriers to person centered planning for adults with developmental disabilities. [Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA]: St. Catherine University; 2013. https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/191
Heller T, Miller AB, Hsieh K, Sterns H. Later-life planning: promoting knowledge of options and choice-making. Ment Retard. 2000;38(5):395–406.
doi: 10.1352/0047-6765(2000)038<0395:LPPKOO>2.0.CO;2
pubmed: 11060981
Ratti V, Hassiotis A, Crabtree J, Deb S, Gallagher P, Unwin G. The effectiveness of person-centred planning for people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2016;57:63–84.
doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.06.015
pubmed: 27394053
Kaehne A, Beyer S. Person-centred reviews as a mechanism for planning the post-school transition of young people with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014;58(7):603–13.
doi: 10.1111/jir.12058
pubmed: 23796061
Parley FF. Person-centred outcomes: are outcomes improved where a person-centred care model is used? J Learn Disabil. 2001;5(4):299–308.
doi: 10.1177/146900470100500402
Sanderson H, Thompson J, Kilbane J. The emergence of person-centred planning as evidence‐based practice. J Integr Care. 2006;14(2):18–25.
doi: 10.1108/147690182006000014
Government of Ontario. Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services. Developmental service (DS) compliance inspection: indicator list. 2021 [cited 2023 Sep 4]. https://www.mcss.gov.on.ca/documents/en/mcss/developmental/EN_DS_Indicator_List.pdf
Stancliffe RJ, Keane S. Outcomes and costs of community living: a matched comparison of group homes and semi-independent living. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2000;25(4):281–305.
doi: 10.1080/13668250020019584
İsvan N, Bonardi A, Hiersteiner D. Effects of person-centred planning and practices on the health and well-being of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a multilevel analysis of linked administrative and survey data. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 4]; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/ https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13015
Office of the Auditor General of Ontario. 3.10: residential services for people with developmental disabilities. 2014. https://www.auditor.on.ca/en/content/annualreports/arreports/en14/310en14.pdf
Office of the Auditor General of Ontario. 1.10 residential services for people with developmental disabilities. 2016. https://www.auditor.on.ca/en/content/annualreports/arreports/en16/v2_110en16.pdf
Robertson J, Emerson E, Hatton C, Elliott J, McIntosh B, Swift P, et al. Person-centred planning: factors associated with successful outcomes for people with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res JIDR. 2007;51(Pt 3):232–43.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00864.x
pubmed: 17300419
Everson JM, Zhang D, Person-Centered Planning. Characteristics, inhibitors, and supports. Educ Train Ment Retard Dev Disabil. 2000;35(1):36–43.
Claes C, Van Hove G, Vandevelde S, van Loon J, Schalock RL. Person-centered planning: analysis of research and effectiveness. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2010;48(6):432–53.
doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-48.6.432
pubmed: 21166549
Stringer K, Terry AL, Ryan BL, Pike A. Patient-centred primary care of adults with severe and profound intellectual and developmental disabilities. Can Fam Physician. 2018;64(Suppl 2):S63–9.
pubmed: 29650747
pmcid: 5906777
Badcock E, Sakellariou D. Treating him… like a piece of meat: poor communication as a barrier to care for people with learning disabilities. Disabil Stud Q. 2022 [cited 2023 Sep 4];42(1). https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/article/view/7408
Mansell J, Beadle-Brown J. Person-centred planning or person-centred action? Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disability Services. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2004;17(1):1–9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00175.x
Bigby C, Frawley P. Social work practice and intellectual disability: working to support change. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2018. p. 253.
Taylor JE, Taylor JA. Person-centered planning: evidence-based practice, challenges, and potential for the 21st century. J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil. 2013;12(3):213–35.
doi: 10.1080/1536710X.2013.810102
pubmed: 23879428
Zijlstra R, Vlaskamp C, Buntinx W. Direct-care staff turnover: an indicator of the quality of life of individuals with profound multiple disabilities. Eur J Mental Disabil. 2001;(22):39–55.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), CIHR-Institute of Health Services and Policy Research (CIHR-IHSPR) and partners. Evidence brief booklet: quadruple aim & equity catalyst grants. 2024 [cited 2024 Apr 2]. https://face2face.events/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Evidence-Brief-Booklet-Quadruple-Aim-and-Equity-EN.pdf
Bergen N, Labonté R. Everything is perfect, and we have no problems: detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(5):783–92.
doi: 10.1177/1049732319889354
pubmed: 31830860