Move for Life an intervention for inactive adults aged 50 years and older: a cluster randomised feasibility trial.

body composition community-based energy expenditure older adults physical activity physical function well-being

Journal

Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 01 12 2023
accepted: 25 04 2024
medline: 30 5 2024
pubmed: 30 5 2024
entrez: 30 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Move for Life (MFL) is a theory-informed intervention that was developed to augment established physical activity (PA) programmes and enable inactive adults aged 50 years and older to be more active. This study examined the feasibility of MFL and sought to provide evidence of its potential for improving PA and associated health outcomes. A 3-arm cluster randomised feasibility trial compared MFL intervention, usual provision (UP) and control (CON) groups at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, at 8, 10 or 12- weeks) and 6-month follow up (T2). We used purposive sampling strategies to recruit participants according to characteristics of interest. Feasibility outcomes assessed recruitment, fidelity, adherence, retention and data completion rates based on pre-set criteria. Primary outcomes were accelerometer-based moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA (MVPA) and self-reported compliance with physical activity guidelines (PAGL). Secondary outcomes included light intensity PA (LiPA), standing time, sedentary time, body composition (adiposity), physical function and psychological well-being. We used linear mixed models (continuous outcomes) or generalized estimated equations (categorical outcomes) to estimate group differences over time in the study outcomes. Progression criteria for feasibility outcomes were met, and 733 individuals were recruited. Considering a 6-month period (T0-T2), while self-reported compliance with PAGL increased in MFL relative to UP and CON and in UP relative to CON, standing time decreased in MFL relative to CON and sedentary time increased in the latter compared to UP. Waist circumference decreased in MFL relative to UP and CON. MFL outperformed UP in the Timed Up and Go Test while MFL and UP increased the distance covered in the Six-Minute Walk Test compared to CON. Psychological well-being increased in MFL relative to CON (all Findings show that MFL is feasible, while data are promising with regards to the potential of improving community PA programmes for adults aged 50 or more years. https://www.isrctn.com/Registration#ISRCTN11235176.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Move for Life (MFL) is a theory-informed intervention that was developed to augment established physical activity (PA) programmes and enable inactive adults aged 50 years and older to be more active. This study examined the feasibility of MFL and sought to provide evidence of its potential for improving PA and associated health outcomes.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A 3-arm cluster randomised feasibility trial compared MFL intervention, usual provision (UP) and control (CON) groups at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, at 8, 10 or 12- weeks) and 6-month follow up (T2). We used purposive sampling strategies to recruit participants according to characteristics of interest. Feasibility outcomes assessed recruitment, fidelity, adherence, retention and data completion rates based on pre-set criteria. Primary outcomes were accelerometer-based moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA (MVPA) and self-reported compliance with physical activity guidelines (PAGL). Secondary outcomes included light intensity PA (LiPA), standing time, sedentary time, body composition (adiposity), physical function and psychological well-being. We used linear mixed models (continuous outcomes) or generalized estimated equations (categorical outcomes) to estimate group differences over time in the study outcomes.
Results UNASSIGNED
Progression criteria for feasibility outcomes were met, and 733 individuals were recruited. Considering a 6-month period (T0-T2), while self-reported compliance with PAGL increased in MFL relative to UP and CON and in UP relative to CON, standing time decreased in MFL relative to CON and sedentary time increased in the latter compared to UP. Waist circumference decreased in MFL relative to UP and CON. MFL outperformed UP in the Timed Up and Go Test while MFL and UP increased the distance covered in the Six-Minute Walk Test compared to CON. Psychological well-being increased in MFL relative to CON (all
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Findings show that MFL is feasible, while data are promising with regards to the potential of improving community PA programmes for adults aged 50 or more years.
Clinical trial registration UNASSIGNED
https://www.isrctn.com/Registration#ISRCTN11235176.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38813401
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348110
pmc: PMC11133700
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1348110

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Woods, O’Regan, Doyle, Hayes, Clifford, Donnelly, Gillespie, Glynn, Murphy, Sheikhi and Bengoechea.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Catherine B Woods (CB)

Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Andrew O'Regan (A)

Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Ciaran Doyle (C)

Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Grainne Hayes (G)

Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Amanda Clifford (A)

Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Ageing Research Center, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Alan E Donnelly (AE)

Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Paddy Gillespie (P)

Centre for Research in Medical Devices (Cúram) and Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Liam Glynn (L)

Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Andrew W Murphy (AW)

HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network, Discipline of General Practice, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Ali Sheikhi (A)

Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Enrique García Bengoechea (EG)

Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH