Cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment of early gestational diabetes mellitus: economic evaluation of the TOBOGM study, an international multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Cost-effectiveness Economic evaluation First trimester Gestational diabetes mellitus Hyperglycemia Neonatal intensive care Pregnancy Randomized controlled trial Screening

Journal

EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2024
Historique:
received: 20 02 2024
revised: 05 04 2024
accepted: 09 04 2024
medline: 30 5 2024
pubmed: 30 5 2024
entrez: 30 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A recently undertaken multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) " Participants' healthcare resource utilization data were collected from their self-reported questionnaires and hospital records, and valued using the unit costs obtained from standard Australian national sources. Costs were reported in US dollars ($) using the purchasing power parity (PPP) estimates to facilitate comparison of costs across countries. Intention-to-treat (ITT) principle was followed. Missing cost data were replaced using multiple imputations. Bootstrapping method was used to estimate the uncertainty around mean cost difference and cost-effectiveness results. Bootstrapped cost-effect pairs were used to plot the cost-effectiveness (CE) plane and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC). Diagnosis and treatment of early GDM was more effective and tended to be less costly, i.e., dominant (cost-saving) [-5.6% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: -10.1%, -1.2%), -$1373 (95% CI: -$3,749, $642)] compared with usual care. Our findings were confirmed by both the CE plane (88% of the bootstrapped cost-effect pairs fall in the south-west quadrant), and CEAC (the probability of the intervention being cost-effective ranged from 84% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold value of $10,000-99% at a WTP threshold value of $100,000 per composite adverse pregnancy outcome prevented). Sub-group analyses demonstrated that diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women in the higher glycemic range (fasting blood glucose 95-109 mg/dl [5.3-6.0 mmol/L], 1-h blood glucose ≥191 mg/dl [10.6 mmol/L] and/or 2-h blood glucose 162-199 mg/dl [9.0-11.0 mmol/L]) was more effective and less costly (dominant) [ Our findings highlight the potential health and economic benefits from the diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women with risk factors for hyperglycemia in pregnancy and supports its implementation. Long-term follow-up studies are recommended as a key future area of research to assess the potential long-term health benefits and economic consequences of the intervention. National Health and Medical Research Council (grants 1104231 and 2009326), Region O¨rebro Research Committee (grants Dnr OLL-970566 and OLL-942177), Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of Vienna (project 15,205 and project 23,026), South Western Sydney Local Health District Academic Unit (grant 2016), and Western Sydney University Ainsworth Trust Grant (2019).

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
A recently undertaken multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) "
Methods UNASSIGNED
Participants' healthcare resource utilization data were collected from their self-reported questionnaires and hospital records, and valued using the unit costs obtained from standard Australian national sources. Costs were reported in US dollars ($) using the purchasing power parity (PPP) estimates to facilitate comparison of costs across countries. Intention-to-treat (ITT) principle was followed. Missing cost data were replaced using multiple imputations. Bootstrapping method was used to estimate the uncertainty around mean cost difference and cost-effectiveness results. Bootstrapped cost-effect pairs were used to plot the cost-effectiveness (CE) plane and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC).
Findings UNASSIGNED
Diagnosis and treatment of early GDM was more effective and tended to be less costly, i.e., dominant (cost-saving) [-5.6% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: -10.1%, -1.2%), -$1373 (95% CI: -$3,749, $642)] compared with usual care. Our findings were confirmed by both the CE plane (88% of the bootstrapped cost-effect pairs fall in the south-west quadrant), and CEAC (the probability of the intervention being cost-effective ranged from 84% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold value of $10,000-99% at a WTP threshold value of $100,000 per composite adverse pregnancy outcome prevented). Sub-group analyses demonstrated that diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women in the higher glycemic range (fasting blood glucose 95-109 mg/dl [5.3-6.0 mmol/L], 1-h blood glucose ≥191 mg/dl [10.6 mmol/L] and/or 2-h blood glucose 162-199 mg/dl [9.0-11.0 mmol/L]) was more effective and less costly (dominant) [
Interpretation UNASSIGNED
Our findings highlight the potential health and economic benefits from the diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women with risk factors for hyperglycemia in pregnancy and supports its implementation. Long-term follow-up studies are recommended as a key future area of research to assess the potential long-term health benefits and economic consequences of the intervention.
Funding UNASSIGNED
National Health and Medical Research Council (grants 1104231 and 2009326), Region O¨rebro Research Committee (grants Dnr OLL-970566 and OLL-942177), Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of Vienna (project 15,205 and project 23,026), South Western Sydney Local Health District Academic Unit (grant 2016), and Western Sydney University Ainsworth Trust Grant (2019).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38813447
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102610
pii: S2589-5370(24)00189-5
pmc: PMC11133791
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

102610

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

WHH reports participation on Merck Sharp & Dohme Board and Rivus Pharmaceuticals Board. DS reports Presidency of the Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society. All otherauthor(s) have no potential conflict of interests to report.

Auteurs

Mohammad M Haque (MM)

Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.

W Kathy Tannous (WK)

School of Business, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW, Australia.

William H Herman (WH)

Schools of Medicine and Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Jincy Immanuel (J)

School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.

William M Hague (WM)

Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Helena Teede (H)

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Joanne Enticott (J)

Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

N Wah Cheung (NW)

Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia.

Emily Hibbert (E)

Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney and Nepean Hospital, Nepean, NSW, Australia.

Christopher J Nolan (CJ)

Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Michael J Peek (MJ)

Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Vincent W Wong (VW)

Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool and University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia.

Jeff R Flack (JR)

Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, NSW, Australia.

Mark Mclean (M)

Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia.

Arianne Sweeting (A)

Department of Endocrinology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Emily Gianatti (E)

Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Fiona Stanley and Fremantle Hospitals, Murdoch, WA, Australia.

Alexandra Kautzky-Willer (A)

Gender Medicine Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gender Medicine Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Medicine, Landesklinikum Scheibbs, Scheibbs, Austria.

Viswanathan Mohan (V)

Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Center and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India.

Helena Backman (H)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.

David Simmons (D)

School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.

Classifications MeSH