Intravenous Lacosamide Therapy for Pediatric Patients With Cluster Seizures.

Adverse effect Child Epilepsy Intravenous therapy Repetitive seizure

Journal

Pediatric neurology
ISSN: 1873-5150
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8508183

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 May 2024
Historique:
received: 27 07 2023
revised: 04 03 2024
accepted: 04 05 2024
medline: 31 5 2024
pubmed: 31 5 2024
entrez: 30 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Few studies have investigated intravenous lacosamide use to treat cluster seizures in pediatric patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous lacosamide therapy in pediatric patients with cluster seizures. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous lacosamide therapy in 25 pediatric patients with cluster seizures at Saitama Children's Medical Center between March 2019 and June 2023. Cluster seizures were defined as a single seizure of less than five minutes duration, repeated three or more times within 12 hours, with recovery of consciousness between seizures. Response was defined as seizure freedom for at least 12 hours after lacosamide infusion. The median age at onset of epilepsy was 1.5 (0.0 to 9.8) years. The median seizure frequency was 5 (3 to 20) times per 12 hours. The etiologies were remote (n = 17), acute (n = 4), and progressive (n = 4). The median age at which intravenous lacosamide therapy was administered was 4.2 (0.0 to 11.3) years. The median lacosamide dose was 2.6 (1.3 to 5.2) mg/kg. In total, 12 of 25 patients (48.0%) responded. Among patients treated with intravenous lacosamide as first-line therapy, nine of 17 (52.9%) had complete seizure remission. The frequency of complete seizure remission in patients with remote etiologies was 58.8% (10 of 17); among them, seven of 12 (58.3%) patients with structural abnormalities showed complete seizure remission. No adverse events were observed. Intravenous lacosamide therapy is a potentially useful treatment option for cluster seizures in pediatric patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Few studies have investigated intravenous lacosamide use to treat cluster seizures in pediatric patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous lacosamide therapy in pediatric patients with cluster seizures.
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous lacosamide therapy in 25 pediatric patients with cluster seizures at Saitama Children's Medical Center between March 2019 and June 2023. Cluster seizures were defined as a single seizure of less than five minutes duration, repeated three or more times within 12 hours, with recovery of consciousness between seizures. Response was defined as seizure freedom for at least 12 hours after lacosamide infusion.
RESULTS RESULTS
The median age at onset of epilepsy was 1.5 (0.0 to 9.8) years. The median seizure frequency was 5 (3 to 20) times per 12 hours. The etiologies were remote (n = 17), acute (n = 4), and progressive (n = 4). The median age at which intravenous lacosamide therapy was administered was 4.2 (0.0 to 11.3) years. The median lacosamide dose was 2.6 (1.3 to 5.2) mg/kg. In total, 12 of 25 patients (48.0%) responded. Among patients treated with intravenous lacosamide as first-line therapy, nine of 17 (52.9%) had complete seizure remission. The frequency of complete seizure remission in patients with remote etiologies was 58.8% (10 of 17); among them, seven of 12 (58.3%) patients with structural abnormalities showed complete seizure remission. No adverse events were observed.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Intravenous lacosamide therapy is a potentially useful treatment option for cluster seizures in pediatric patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38815509
pii: S0887-8994(24)00194-2
doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.05.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-4

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest Shin-ichiro Hamano has received funds for speaker honoraria and travel from Eisai Co Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd, and UCB Japan Co Ltd and has received research funding from Syneos Health Clinical Co Ltd for the clinical trial of Zogenix. Kenjiro Kikuchi has received research funding from Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. and Syneos Health Clinical Co Ltd for clinical trial of Zogenix. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Auteurs

Ryuki Matsuura (R)

Division of Neurology, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Chuo-ku, Saitama, Japan; Department of Pediatrics, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: ryuki@jikei.ac.jp.

Shin-Ichiro Hamano (SI)

Division of Neurology, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Chuo-ku, Saitama, Japan.

Kenjiro Kikuchi (K)

Division of Neurology, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Chuo-ku, Saitama, Japan; Department of Pediatrics, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Rikako Takeda (R)

Division of Neurology, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Chuo-ku, Saitama, Japan.

Hirokazu Takeuchi (H)

Division of Neurology, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Chuo-ku, Saitama, Japan; Department of Pediatrics, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Yuko Hirata (Y)

Division of Neurology, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Chuo-ku, Saitama, Japan; Department of Pediatrics, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Reiko Koichihara (R)

Division of Child Health and Human Development, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.

Takehiro Niitsu (T)

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.

Ikuya Ueta (I)

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.

Akira Oka (A)

Division of Neurology, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Chuo-ku, Saitama, Japan.

Classifications MeSH