Toward a disruptive, minimally invasive small finger joint implant concept: Cellular and molecular interactions with materials in vivo.

Animal models Biocompatibility Gene expression Osteoarthritis Polyurethanes

Journal

Acta biomaterialia
ISSN: 1878-7568
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomater
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101233144

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 May 2024
Historique:
received: 23 01 2024
revised: 21 05 2024
accepted: 24 05 2024
medline: 31 5 2024
pubmed: 31 5 2024
entrez: 30 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Osteoarthritis (OA) poses significant therapeutic challenges, particularly OA that affects the hand. Currently available treatment strategies are often limited in terms of their efficacy in managing pain, regulating invasiveness, and restoring joint function. The APRICOT® implant system developed by Aurora Medical Ltd (Chichester, UK) introduces a minimally invasive, bone-conserving approach for treating hand OA (https://apricot-project.eu/). By utilizing polycarbonate urethane (PCU), this implant incorporates a caterpillar track-inspired design to promote the restoration of natural movement to the joint. Surface modifications of PCU have been proposed for the biological fixation of the implant. This study investigated the biocompatibility of PCU alone or in combination with two surface modifications, namely dopamine-carboxymethylcellulose (dCMC) and calcium-phosphate (CaP) coatings. In a rat soft tissue model, native and CaP-coated PCU foils did not increase cellular migration or cytotoxicity at the implant-soft tissue interface after 3 d, showing gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines similar to that in non-implanted sham sites. However, dCMC induced an amplified initial inflammatory response that was characterized by increased chemotaxis and cytotoxicity, as well as pronounced gene activation of proinflammatory macrophages and neoangiogenesis. By 21 d, inflammation subsided in all the groups, allowing for implant encapsulation. In a rat bone model, 6 d and 28 d after release of the periosteum, all implant types were adapted to the bone surface with a surrounding fibrous capsule and no protracted inflammatory response was observed. These findings demonstrated the biocompatibility of native and CaP-coated PCU foils as components of APRICOT® implants. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Hand osteoarthritis treatments require materials that minimize irritation of the delicate finger joints. Differing from existing treatments, the APRICOT® implant leverages polycarbonate urethane (PCU) for minimally invasive joint replacement. This interdisciplinary, preclinical study investigated the biocompatibility of thin polycarbonate urethane (PCU) foils and their surface modifications with calcium-phosphate (CaP) or dopamine-carboxymethylcellulose (dCMC). Cellular and morphological analyses revealed that both native and Ca-P coated PCU elicit transient inflammation, similar to sham sites, and a thin fibrous encapsulation in soft tissues and on bone surfaces. However, dCMC surface modification amplified initial chemotaxis and cytotoxicity, with pronounced activation of proinflammatory and neoangiogenesis genes. Therefore, native and CaP-coated PCU possess sought-for biocompatible properties, crucial for patient safety and performance of APRICOT® implant.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38815684
pii: S1742-7061(24)00289-7
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.05.042
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Andy Taylor is the inventor and holds patents related to the device. The other authors do not have any conflict of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Heithem Ben Amara (HB)

Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Pardis Farjam (P)

Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

Theresa M Lutz (TM)

School of Engineering and Design, Department of Materials Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Omar Omar (O)

Department of Biomedical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Anders Palmquist (A)

Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Oliver Lieleg (O)

School of Engineering and Design, Department of Materials Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Martin Browne (M)

Bioengineering Science Research Group, School of Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Andy Taylor (A)

Aurora Medical Ltd, Chichester, UK.

Gijsbertus J Verkerke (GJ)

Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

Jeroen Rouwkema (J)

Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

Peter Thomsen (P)

Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.. Electronic address: peter.thomsen@biomaterials.gu.se.

Classifications MeSH